Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Patrick Peterson Meeting With Panthers


The Saltman

Recommended Posts

No to any DB, WR etc with the #1 pick, none are worth it

that's not true

you're telling me if given the opportunity to draft Revis, Asomugha, Polamalu, Reed, etc #1 overall you wouldn't because they're DB's?

you take the best player available, period. Peterson might be that guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with the style of defense we are planning on changing to a CB like PP would be Ideal. I dont think there is a clear cut person that "should" be the #1 pick.

Pretty much. They just have to meet all the ones they have an interest in. Can't stop scouting the players simply because they aren't #1 material in a draft that has no true #1 on the basis of "Wishing someone may want to trade up".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trade down and that is fine with me but there is no way in hell I'm ok with taking Peterson #1 overall. IMO the only pick that should be #1 is Fairley or Bowers at that spot to a team that trades up to get them...

It's just due diligence... And Peterson deserves the consideration with the #1 pick. Wouldn't be a surprise if we interviewed/met with somewhere between the top 10-15 guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That should have been this year. Tough to sell to anyone worth getting when this crew is going into year 3 on the hot seat. I still think keeping Evero will sink them all after last year's showing. If/when he is scapegoated they need to show improvement or it's likely to be so eone else's problem next year. I do agree in principle tho, it all should have happened after last year's problems. 
    • I've listened to some things that have calmed the "Bryce was flat out terrible" to just "he was really bad" in Week 1. It's Year 3 though, and that shouldn't be the barometer. I've got 1% hope left for Bryce, and that's just blind homerism coming out.  I'm scared that as much emphasis as the team places on advanced stats and PFF that the team *doesn't* think Bryce was that bad in Week 1. Couple that with so many of the QBs in the league looking rough, offense being down in general, and I feel like there's a lot of "what if's" going on in the building instead of facing the music.  Lose Week 2, and we should switch the main focus back to building/churning the roster, evaluating young guys, and hoping our next QB can have a Jayden Daniels level of impact. As we're all well too aware of, QB is a crapshoot a lot of the time. Admit we made a bad pick, and go draft another. And another. Repeat until correct.     
    • I wouldn't want any of those starting as a rookie on day 1.  That said, we need a vet, that is not Andy Dalton, that can be the starter while a prospect grows and learns on the sidelines.
×
×
  • Create New...