Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What in the world? (Cardinals DC)


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

His regular season stats are terrible. He made up for it in the playoffs some but apparently Wisenhunt isn't willing to take a chance that his DC will remember what he did last season. Their defense sat down at the end of the Super Bowl. He knows that he won't have the same players and players' memories are very short. So he needs a good DC. :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what are the chances of him coming here as a positions coach? or do yall think he would rather take another dc job?

Probably a greater chance he becomes Todd Haley's DC with the Chiefs.

Then again, he was previously with the Browns. That increases his chances of being hired here :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks for Keith Bell, the LB coach for the Steelers the last six years to get a long look. Coach Whiz want to run a true 3-4 and has experience with him. Clancy was a holdover from the Dennis Green era. Probably a good move in the long run. Not allot of tears being shed in Phoenix today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pendergast has been a pretty solid DC scheme-wise, even when the Cards haven't had the greatest defensive personnel.

I don't get it.

Cardinals want to run a 3-4, Pendergast likes to run a 4-3. Cardinals blew allot of leads late in games last season, including the Superbowl. Look at the Cowboys, 49ers, Eagles and Steeler games and you will get the idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cardinals want to run a 3-4, Pendergast likes to run a 4-3. Cardinals blew allot of leads late in games last season, including the Superbowl. Look at the Cowboys, 49ers, Eagles and Steeler games and you will get the idea.

If they want to switch to 3-4, that I get. And again, I wouldn't be at all surprised to see him join Haley over in KC.

If you want to talk defensive letdowns though, trust me. We can trump you there :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He would be a good fit at the open linebacking coach position but coming off the super bowl as a defensive coordinator I doubt he was going to take a demotion if he can be a coordinator elsewhere. However, if he doesn't think he can get on as a DC anywhere and seeing how most teams already have their OC and DC and assistant coaches set he could end up in Carolina. But I would agree that him going to KC with Haley is probably the most likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
    • Especially since we’re neck and neck with them for the play in
×
×
  • Create New...