Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cat Scratch Reader article about what offense we will run.


eViL jEsTeR

Recommended Posts

http://www.derp/2011/2/5/1975521/so-what-will-the-offense-look-like-in-2011-part-one

I found this part most interesting.

---------------------------------------------

Let's end the suspense before it starts. Presumably, Chud has picked up some things along the way from the offensive coordinators he worked for. In his career, he's worked under Terry Robiski, Cam Cameron, and Clarence Shelmon. All three are advocates of the Coryell offense, and in particular the Norv Turner variant. Coincidentally, Norv Turner is the current head coach of the Chargers, Chud's last team. So if you're wondering, the odds are pretty good that this is what we see in Carolina next year.

And let's get the irony out of the way. Our last Offensive Coordinator was Jeff Davidson, who followed Chud in Cleveland. Chud ran a variation of the Air Coryell offense there, and Davidson went to an Erhardt-Perkins system. Prior to Davidson's tenure, Dan Henning worked the sidelines in Carolina, and he also ran the Air Coryell offense. Davidson came here and again changed it to an Erhardt-Perkins system. And now Chud gets to follow Davidson and put the Coryell system back.

---------------------------------------------

It's a two part article.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thought of Clausen running an Air Coryell attack doesn't encourage me much. He's way better suited to a West Coast Offense :(

Honestly, of guys that are connected (sort of) to the Panthers right now, the QB with the best skill set is probably...(cue dramatic music)...Matt Moore.

I still think our starter for the coming year will be a vet like Volek though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scot, look at what Turner did with the Coryell offense in Dallas. There was still the long ball, but a real emphasis on quick short and mid-range passes based on timing. I probably could have put more in there on that, but my fingers were tired...

I figure if Clausen is the starter, they'll adapt to his particular strengths and weaknesses. If we can't threaten downfield though, we'll be limited in both run and pass. Definitely not Clausen's strong suit.

Again though, I'm not especially convinced that Clausen will be the starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think limiting the new staff by assuming they can't/won't devise an offense according to our players and not the other way is a mistake. The past here is not a clear indication of the future.

Not sure what you mean by that? Are you suggesting we're looking at another offensive system?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I figure if Clausen is the starter, they'll adapt to his particular strengths and weaknesses. If we can't threaten downfield though, we'll be limited in both run and pass. Definitely not Clausen's strong suit.

Again though, I'm not especially convinced that Clausen will be the starter.

Yeah, I was thinking that. Then I started looking at who else is out there, and the odds we get them. Frankly, I'm not sold that Clausen would get beat out in Training Camp by Billy Volek. But when I say that, I'm assuming he makes a decent improvement from his rookie year.

Worst case would be a year two Jimmy, though, which just about has to be better than year one. And our quarterback doesn't have to air it out deep constantly, just enough to remind the defense that he's willing to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...