Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I'm starting 2 hope Jimmy can prove people wrong.


koolkatluke

Recommended Posts

Before I start let me say I was a big Luck person and had lost all hope in Clausen.

Since Luck is staying in school and Jimmy is taking so much crap for being horrible his 1st year. I'm starting 2 be a Jimmy fan.

I hope this kid can get everything that Rip taught him washed from his head and get better from better coaching and a better system.

As I look back at all the scouting reports he didn't get bad grades from any service. Most if not all had him pegged as a Franchise QB.

Maybe we should try 2 build around him he did have a bad freshman year at ND then got better every year afterthat.

Maybe it's wishful thinking but do any of you think Jimmy can be a franchise QB with better coaching fixing the oline and maybe a elite TE added 2 the weapons we have at RB and WR?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really wish he could be a great QB, I just haven't seen any evidence of it yet really.

He'll get his chance this year, and he'll have plenty of people still rooting for him. I just don't know he has the ability to actually succeed in the offense was are supposedly implementing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it would be fair to give up on him after his rookie season. I definitely think he should sit a season though behind a veteran and with a better coaching staff. He showed some ability to extend plays and make some nice throws, he just needs confidence, maturity, and a better supporting cast. I think he can be the guy personally if we can develop him properly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really get this "he has to sit this season" stuff.

If he doesn't win his starting job in camp, so be it, but don't go into it thinking he has to sit. Why? He's not going to suddenly turn into Aaron Rodgers if we pretend he didn't start his rookie year and bench him for 4 years while we hope he develops. This isn't Green Bay, this isn't that situation. We need to know what we have out of him, and that involves him actually trying to win his job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really wish he could be a great QB, I just haven't seen any evidence of it yet really.

He'll get his chance this year, and he'll have plenty of people still rooting for him. I just don't know he has the ability to actually succeed in the offense was are supposedly implementing.

That's what's killing me where did all his ability go???

It's not like Kiper was the only one high on Clausen alot of scout's we like and respect were.

His size shouldn't be a probelm because A rodgers is the same size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what's killing me where did all his ability go???

It's not like Kiper was the only one high on Clausen alot of scout's we like and respect were.

His size shouldn't be a probelm because A rodgers is the same size.

I don't think his ability went anywhere. It could be argued that he had better receivers at ND than he had here. I think that he wasn't confident in his ability to fit the ball in the much tinier windows in the pro game and was more worried about not making a mistake than attacking down the field. The difference between him and Rodgers is that Clausen doesn't have the same arm strength or accuracy at this point. Plus short dumpoff passes are easier to knock down than longer throws downs the field based on the trajectory of the ball. If Clausen is going to get better he is going to have to let the ball fly and throw it into coverage. The dink and dunk approach won't work in our new offense unless he has set it up by going down the field and backed off the safeties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not trying 2 defend Jimmy's play because it was baaaaaaaaaaaaddddddd!!!!!

But it everything that can hurt a rookie QB seem 2 happen for Jimmy this year.

Oline starting slow with injuries. Only one WR option (which he didn't get 2 work with in the preseason) for most of the year. Injuries at the Rb spot plus some of the RB having cases of the fumbles. Bad OC and QB coach no vet leadership at the QB position. Thrown in the line of fire way 2 early.

Jimmy was bad but how good was his situation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think his ability went anywhere. It could be argued that he had better receivers at ND than he had here. I think that he wasn't confident in his ability to fit the ball in the much tinier windows in the pro game and was more worried about not making a mistake than attacking down the field. The difference between him and Rodgers is that Clausen doesn't have the same arm strength or accuracy at this point. Plus short dumpoff passes are easier to knock down than longer throws downs the field based on the trajectory of the ball. If Clausen is going to get better he is going to have to let the ball fly and throw it into coverage. The dink and dunk approach won't work in our new offense unless he has set it up by going down the field and backed off the safeties.

That's what so crazy alot of scout's say he had a stronger arm then Rodgers and he got high marks in accuracy as well. Mayock said his arm isn't Cutler or Russel level but a notch or 2 below. Could Rip have F'ed up his throwing motion that much? He wasn't getting that many balls knocked down in ND. What happen 2 the quick release as well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was actually "favorably compared" to Rodgers by a couple sites I read.

His throwing motion in college was a bit strange but I swear it wasn't as bad as we saw this year. He also had batted balls in college because of his height etc, but he can learn to avoid that. His draft profile on ESPN specifically mentions he had batted balls in college and likely would in the pros, but that is something that can be coached around.

At ND, he did seem to have a very quick release. I wonder if Rip tried to correct his throwing motion and in doing so f'd up the speed of his release.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what so crazy alot of scout's say he had a stronger arm then Rodgers and he got high marks in accuracy as well. Mayock said his arm isn't Cutler or Russel level but a notch or 2 below. Could Rip have F'ed up his throwing motion that much? He wasn't getting that many balls knocked down in ND. What happen 2 the quick release as well?

Could have been the toe injury, could have been a desire to get the ball too quickly. It is hard to say. From everything I have seen, Rip likely didn't do him many favors either. I don't remember his release in college being as sidearm and low as it was this year but I didn't see that many ND games so maybe it was me. But I was pretty excited when we got him until I actually saw him play. I think for most of us it was a huge disappointment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was actually "favorably compared" to Rodgers by a couple sites I read.

His throwing motion in college was a bit strange but I swear it wasn't as bad as we saw this year. He also had batted balls in college because of his height etc, but he can learn to avoid that. His draft profile on ESPN specifically mentions he had batted balls in college and likely would in the pros, but that is something that can be coached around.

At ND, he did seem to have a very quick release. I wonder if Rip tried to correct his throwing motion and in doing so f'd up the speed of his release.

The comparisons must have been Rodgers coming out of college not the guy we saw on Sunday. I agree that the Clausen we saw this year was a huge disappointment after all the hype. Seemed like the guy we saw was nothing like the guy in college. I don't know if it was all Rip but he didn't do the kid any favors it would seem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The referee assigned to this game is Shawn Smith. This is a critical data point for betting purposes because his crew has one of the most distinct, long-term statistical biases in the NFL. "Road Team" Bias: Historically, Shawn Smith is known as the "Road Team Referee." In a league where home teams usually win ~55% of the time, home teams in Smith's games have historically won at a rate far below league average (often hovering around 40-42%). Against The Spread (ATS): The trend is even starker here. Home teams have covered the spread at a rate of roughly 37-40% in his career. The Mechanism: Analysis shows his crew tends to call a higher rate of False Start and Unnecessary Roughness penalties on the Home Team. This negates the traditional home-field advantage (crowd noise causing false starts for the visitors). Impact on This Game: This specific assignment heavily favors the Buccaneers (Road Team). If you believe the referee influences the game, Smith's presence suggests the Panthers will struggle to get "home cooking" calls and may face untimely procedural flags that stall drives. The Panthers have only had Shawn Smith officiate four home games since he became a head referee in 2018, and they are all losses. Date Opponent Result Score Nov 24, 2024 vs. Kansas City Chiefs Loss 27–30 Oct 9, 2022 vs. San Francisco 49ers Loss 15–37 Dec 12, 2021 vs. Atlanta Falcons Loss 21–29 Nov 25, 2018 vs. Seattle Seahawks Loss 27–30 Considering the how rare it is for Shawn Smith to officiate a Panthers game at all, this seems like an odd time to assign him to a Panthers game, unless the NFL wants to kill the Panthers season once and for all.  The Panthers' offensive line situation creates a "perfect storm" for referee Shawn Smith's specific tendency to call False Starts on the home team. The "Carousel" Factor (Communication Vulnerability) The most damning stat for the Panthers' offensive line in 2025 is their lack of continuity. The Stat: By Week 13, the Panthers had already fielded their 10th different offensive line combination. The Impact: False starts are often "communication penalties"—they happen when a guard doesn't hear the center's snap count or a tackle anticipates the wrong cadence. A unit that hasn't played together struggles with non-verbal communication. The Shawn Smith Multiplier: Shawn Smith’s crew calls False Starts at a high rate on home teams. He will likely look for flinches on the exterior of the line. A disjointed line that is constantly rotating players (due to the injuries of starters like Cade Mays and the illness issues with Robert Hunt earlier this season) is "fresh meat" for this specific referee bias. The Specific Culprits (2025 Penalties) Ikem Ekwonu (LT): Leads the team with 4 False Start penalties this season. He is the most frequent violator on the line. Taylor Moton (RT): Has been flagged for 3 False Starts. The Trap: Smith’s crew often focuses on the tackles (the players furthest from the ball) jumping early to get an edge on speed rushers. Since Ekwonu struggles with this discipline naturally, having a referee who hunts for it is a massive disadvantage. The "Managed Outcome" Synthesis The "Bucs Cover" Script: If the desired outcome is a Buccaneers win to solidify their playoff standing, the officials simply have to apply the letter of the law. Calling strict False Starts on a confused, banged-up Panthers O-line will consistently put them in "3rd and Long" situations, killing their drives and allowing the Bucs (-3.5) to cover easily. The "Close Game" Script: If the desired outcome is "Week 18 Drama" (keeping the division tied), look for the officials to ignore the Panthers' twitchy tackles. If Ekwonu jumps a split-second early and no flag is thrown, it effectively neutralizes the Bucs' pass rush, allowing the Panthers to keep the score close. Summary of the Edge Vulnerability: Extreme. The Panthers are playing backup interior linemen (like Jake Curhan or practice squad call-ups) next to jumpy tackles. Betting Implication: This strongly reinforces the Bucs -3 or -3.5 play. The combination of a "Road Team Referee" and a "Home Team O-Line in chaos" suggests the Panthers will beat themselves with procedural penalties. Based on the collision of the hard data (Referee bias + Offensive Line injuries) and the soft narratives ("Managed Outcomes"), here is the definitive recommendation. If you have to place a single Moneyline bet to win this game straight up: The Pick: Tampa Bay Buccaneers (-165) While the "Entertainment Script" hints at a Panthers upset to keep the division messy, the structural disadvantage the Panthers face in this specific matchup is too massive to ignore. Here is why the Buccaneers are the stong moneyline play: 1. The "Shawn Smith" Road-Field Advantage This is the decisive factor. In the NFL, Home Field Advantage usually accounts for about 1.5 to 2 points of value. The Reality: Referee Shawn Smith negates that advantage entirely. His crew calls penalties in a way that historically suppresses home crowd momentum (False Starts, holding). The Result: You are essentially getting the Buccaneers on a neutral field (or even a "pseudo-home" field) against a team with a worse roster. 2. The "Drive-Killer" Synergy To win as an underdog, the Panthers need to play a clean, mistake-free game to keep drives alive. The combination of Panthers' 10th O-Line combo + Jump-prone Tackles (Ekwonu) + A Referee who hunts False Starts is a recipe for disaster. The Scenario: Expect the Panthers to face multiple "1st and 15" or "3rd and 12" situations due to procedural flags. These drive-killers will force them to punt or settle for field goals, while the Bucs' offense (led by Mayfield) stays on schedule. 3. The "TV Product" Counter-Argument You asked about the "Managed Outcome." While a Panthers win creates "chaos," the NFL also values Star Power in the playoffs. Baker Mayfield and the Buccaneers are a proven national TV draw with recent playoff history. If the league has to choose between "Chaos" (Panthers) and "Ratings/Legitimacy" (Bucs), the "Script" likely leans toward ensuring the Buccaneers—the more marketable team—secure the division lead. They won't "fix" the game against the Panthers, but they won't intervene to save them from their own penalties. Final Verdict Betting on the Panthers requires you to hope for a miracle 4th-quarter collapse. Betting on the Buccaneers requires you to trust that a superior roster—aided by a favorable officiating crew—will control the game for the first 45 minutes. Take the Buccaneers Moneyline. The "Safe" money is on the Ref. The Prediction: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Win and Cover Projected Score: Buccaneers 27, Panthers 17 The Bet: Buccaneers -3 (or Moneyline -165) Confidence Level: High on the Winner; Moderate on the Spread (due to potential "garbage time" variance).
    • He isn't a good HC. I think he has proved that conclusively.
    • The missed tackle percentage is on that screen cap.
×
×
  • Create New...