Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kiper has Cam as one of the first QB off the board


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

I know there are other Cam threads floating around, I just wanted to post this for every saying he's a late first-early second round pick. He also stated he likely won't make it out of the top five after this latest workout. People who are saying we should trade down and maybe select him then it's not happening.

Alot of people are say there are no Elite QB in this draft,but what Newton is an Elite talent. Not saying he's a better prospect than luck or manning but he does have once in a generation talent. If i'm handling Newton as much as i want to see it, I don't let him throw at the combine. I don't see a reason for a top 10 lock to potentially drop his stock.

With the value of qb being a higher than any other position and us needing a qb, How can a guy being projected as the 5th best prospect not be good enuff for number 1? We averaged 12 points a game last year and most of the huddle wants us to draft a defensive player?

We for the first time in ages have a chance to Get the best qb prospect in the draft. How often will we be able to say we have our pick of the litter? How often does a 6'6 250 player with a rocket arm and 4.4 speed come along?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's not wrong though. You talk like a politician on here. Leaving yourself just enough wiggle room to say you never fully counted Bryce out if you need to....But we can all see it. Just say you think he is a bust outright and you will have to type a lot less. Obfuscating your opinion behind QB3 competitions etc....
    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
×
×
  • Create New...