Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Be careful what you wish for


cranky
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

In the nfl he hasn't thrown many at all. Thats on the coaches.

Every pass over 30 or more in his career has been incomplete if NexGen is correct.    I don't think it is all on the coaches just not asking him enough. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Every pass over 30 or more in his career has been incomplete if NexGen is correct.    I don't think it is all on the coaches just not asking him enough. 

 

I think the coaches don’t want opponents to see his limited range. I don’t think it’s a secret at this point though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Every pass over 30 or more in his career has been incomplete if NexGen is correct.    I don't think it is all on the coaches just not asking him enough. 

 

Well im sure some were drops if you look at each one. I'm not interested enough to look. It doesn't matter if he can throw it a mile at this point. He's just not an nfl qb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

Well im sure some were drops if you look at each one. I'm not interested enough to look. It doesn't matter if he can throw it a mile at this point. He's just not an nfl qb.

I think his placement on deep balls is more often than not, just bad.   When it comes to downfield balls, Bryce generally makes life hard.   

You actually don't need a cannon for the vertical stuff on the sidelines.  Some of the best deep throwers really are just well placed lobs. .   Now the deep middle? Yeah, I like a strong arm. 

Bryce never really sets up a WR to go get it.  If you get in position and beat your guy he is going to turn it into a 50/50 letting the defender contest it or make you have to worry about staying in bounds. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

I think his placement on deep balls is more often than not, just bad.   When it comes to downfield balls, Bryce generally makes life hard.   

You actually don't need a cannon for the vertical stuff on the sidelines.  Some of the best deep throwers really are just well placed lobs. .   Now the deep middle? Yeah, I like a strong arm. 

Bryce never really sets up a WR to go get it.  If you get in position and beat your guy he is going to turn it into a 50/50 letting the defender contest it or make you have to worry about staying in bounds. 

Like I said, it doesn't matter how far he can or cannot throw the ball. Most (95%) of the game is played within 20 yards of the line of scrimmage anyway. Having a big arm is plus for sure but not completely necessary. Height and  weight is up there and I would argue more important than arm strength. Accuracy and being able to function under pressure is priority number 1 if you ask me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CRA said:

I think his placement on deep balls is more often than not, just bad.   When it comes to downfield balls, Bryce generally makes life hard.   

You actually don't need a cannon for the vertical stuff on the sidelines.  Some of the best deep throwers really are just well placed lobs. .   Now the deep middle? Yeah, I like a strong arm. 

Bryce never really sets up a WR to go get it.  If you get in position and beat your guy he is going to turn it into a 50/50 letting the defender contest it or make you have to worry about staying in bounds. 

Agree. There may be one or two times where he hit someone in stride or put it out there for a WR to go get it but I struggle to recall them.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

It wasn't a designated thrower. Reich decided to let Andy do it because he thought Bryce hurt his shoulder the weak before. It was the wrong decision then and it pissed Young and Tepper off. He should have let him throw it anyway, even if he thought he couldn't. It was another reason he got fired. 

Btw I am glad this came up because it is a good story. I guess that is subjective but I liked it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, strato said:

Btw I am glad this came up because it is a good story. I guess that is subjective but I liked it. 

Well if you can find the interviews you can put the pieces together. There was some tension during and after the game. It was the sign that Frank was a dead man walking.  The was other clues leading up to that game that let me know the knives were out in BOA but I couldn't prove it until the Seattle game when he started Dalton and completely changed the play sheet. That was a FU to Tepper and Fitterer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Like I said, it doesn't matter how far he can or cannot throw the ball. Most (95%) of the game is played within 20 yards of the line of scrimmage anyway. Having a big arm is plus for sure but not completely necessary. Height and  weight is up there and I would argue more important than arm strength. Accuracy and being able to function under pressure is priority number 1 if you ask me.

and most really good QBs are nickel and diming folks these days because the league really fixates now on sitting in 2 high shell these days to take away those deeper balls (big shift to those 2 high S looks in recent years).    But with Bryce teams aren't having to devote energy to taking that away and it impacts coverage elsewhere.  

You see that with S play for example vs Bryce.   Makes his intermediate passing more difficult. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

and most really good QBs are nickel and diming folks these days because the league really fixates now on sitting in 2 high shell these days to take away those deeper balls (big shift to those 2 high S looks in recent years).    But with Bryce teams aren't having to devote energy to taking that away and it impacts coverage elsewhere.  

You see that with S play for example vs Bryce.   Makes his intermediate passing more difficult. 

That and Canales has been figured out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

That and Canales has been figured out.

I think Canales paired w/ Bryce has been figured out.  

I think Canales is pretty simplistic.  Which he told us when we hired him.   You need a QB like Baker he is flat out going to make big throws downfield.  Or a Jake.  He isn't some modern day scheme dude.  Run run set up the downfield stuff.  It's not going to be the scheme but players that win.  I mean, it's not literally every possession but that was every passing O Canales has ever been around and it's the core of what his O is structured to be. 

Bryce doesn't fit that.  Bryce needs a modern day playcaller and scheme w/ the weapons to go with it.  Dave issue is the same as the Frank issue ultimately.  We got a front office that is building something that actually syncs up.  Failure by design. 

If you wanted Bryce, you don't hire Frank.  Or Dave.  And you don't draft XL.  You draft Ladd.  Carolina makes simple hard.   Which you see that a lot in life. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

I think Canales paired w/ Bryce has been figured out.  

I think Canales is pretty simplistic.  Which he told us when we hired him.   You need a QB like Baker he is flat out going to make big throws downfield.  Or a Jake.  He isn't some modern day scheme dude.  Run run set up the downfield stuff.  It's not going to be the scheme but players that win.  I mean, it's not literally every possession but that was every passing O Canales has ever been around and it's the core of what his O is structured to be. 

Bryce doesn't fit that.  Bryce needs a modern day playcaller and scheme w/ the weapons to go with it.  Dave issue is the same as the Frank issue ultimately.  We got a front office that is building something that actually syncs up.  Failure by design. 

If you wanted Bryce, you don't hire Frank.  Or Dave.  And you don't draft XL.  You draft Ladd.  Carolina makes simple hard.   Which you see that a lot in life. 

We have always done things the hard way. It's due to a lack of leadership and vision. They solely rely on pure luck and they don't have any.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ehh, new front office has 2 drafts under their belt -- Salaun draft class was really a horrible class in general, but Salaun has started to show some of his potential and KJ Simpson not bad for a 2nd round pick. This past draft clearly looks like it was knocked out of the fuging park obviously with Kon but also Sion and Kalk already contributing in somewhat big roles for late round picks. And McNeeley has shown potential and lit it up in summer league, seems to be doing well in the G league for a young guy too.      As for this season I think a very realistic goal and outcome of the regular season is sneaking up into a 7 or 8 seed and then winning 1 of 2 play-in games to make the real playoffs. Probably get cooked in round 1 but that playoff experience and establishing that expectation of winning is critical to the development of our young core. 
    • Sound write-up MHS, as always.  Agree that the smart move that forward thinking franchises make would be drafting a tackle early, if not for sure in R1, depending on who's there. Based on early predictions we're choosing between Fano and Proctor. No brainer here...Fano all day. Proctor does not move the needle for me. In my mind, Icky has less future here than Brooks does. I love Icky, but he has been average as a top-10 pick, one good year where you saw the potential...and that was this year. He's built like a RT and his strengths are there, but he's always played left. I also feel like part of what has held him back from being elite, was his work ethic. He was known for it coming out, but feel like he fell right at home in Carolina and maybe didn't push himself as hard as he needed to. Throw in a major crucial injury that will take time to recover and a historical low return rate to current form, and the outlook is not great. Fano can play both sides and we need to also plan for Moton's departure. Either way, delaying drafting a tackle early this year will hurt us down the line. Our current OL is overpriced and needs to start adding draftees to start balancing out the inevitable changes coming in the next 2-3 years.  As others have said, maybe Icky can replace Hunt or Lewis in a couple years when he's fully recovered....IDK. Also not a guarantee, but then you have to figure out his contract and it becomes even more clouded.
    • It's past time to just eliminate it in terms of an event. Just do the voting, name the roster, and move on. When you get down to 6th and 7th alternates it's just absurd. It doesn't mean anything.
×
×
  • Create New...