Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Dowdle Mirage - Play Calling Problems


tukafan21
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

So basically what you’re saying is we won despite Canales sucking and Rico getting lucky on a few carries… on to the much hated Cowboys

In a sense, but I'd say it's more like we won because the Dolphins were just a worse team and because Evero made the adjustments needed to keep the game close enough to have a chance.  

Which, again, is my point and the same one I was making after the Falcons game.  

Winning in spite of your mistakes because the other team made worse mistakes, is not something that gets me excited moving forward, it just makes me more concerned, particularly when this coaching staff has already shown that they don't fix their mistakes moving forward week to week.

And, as I've said, I'm just done "enjoying wins" because we got a win, despite not actually looking good while doing so.

I want to get into the playoffs again, I want to contend for SB's.  To me, showing improvement and looking good, but still losing in the end, would make me happier and more excited for our future than backing into wins against bad teams in spite of our own issues.  Not a single thing about this win gives me hope about our long term future, but numerous things happened throughout the game that give me cause for concern.

And that's not me saying I want losses for draft positioning, I'd still rather win those games, but if it's look good and lose or look bad and win, it's an easy decision for me to look good but lose.

This season was never meant to be about winning games, it was about showing improvement, which is 100% something you can do in losses, just as you can show regression in wins.  I don't care about winning or losing this year, I care about improving as a team, record aside.

To me, this is a season where showing improvement is a win, showing regression (or the same mistakes) is a loss, the actual win or loss is irrelevant to me because we're not a contending team right now, that's when wins and losses matter.

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tukafan21 said:

Two separate issues

Yes, T-Mac 100% needs to be fed more, 8 targets out of 30 attempts when he's the only legitimate receiving threat right now is just dumb, but that has zero bearing on Rico's game.

Again, 6 good plays by Rico does not make for a well called game by Canales, I don't understand why that's so controversial of a thing to say.

Rico had a great game and final stats because he made a handful of great plays, not because Canales kept the Dolphins on their heels and because of it we ripped off constant 8-15 yard runs.  Had that been how he put up the 200+ yards, I'd be the first person to jump on here and congratulate Canales for calling a great game, but that's just not how it played out.

It's giving credit to Rico for the game he had, but still living in reality in the totality of the play calling of Canales from opening kick off to the final whistle.  Outside of those few runs, you can't tell me you weren't screaming at the TV for the majority of the game with Canales boring and predictable play calling (and play design).

That's all I was trying to say with this thread, that we can't give Canales a pass because Rico broke off a couple big plays, he still called a complete poo game as the offensive play caller.

As that's exactly what happened a couple weeks ago.  We win 30-0 in a rivalry game and half the fan base starts talking about how we're finally turning a corner and just stuck their head in the grounds to not see the glaring issues that we still saw in that game.  Then we get utterly blown out by a team that wasn't a complete disaster in their own right and fans fall back in disarray.

image.thumb.png.cfe2747486110e5dc1cc5532cf5c3008.png

The most targets any player that wasn't TMac got was 3 (XL, Dowdle). I don't think it's reasonable to demand that he have gotten an additional 4 - 6 targets during a game where an RB went for over 200yds rushing, especially when seven of those 23 carries were for 10+. One of those carries went for over 50+, another 40+, and another 20+.

Canales' play calling wasn't the best, but it is developing as well. That's more than fair to criticize, but there's much better options to choose from than not feeding TMac in a game that resulted in a dub (with 200+ yards gained on the ground).

I think that rather than half the fanbase sticking their heads in the ground to avoid issues that there are some fans with their heads up their ass because all they seem to see is poo. 😛

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Icege said:

image.thumb.png.cfe2747486110e5dc1cc5532cf5c3008.png

The most targets any player that wasn't TMac got was 3 (XL, Dowdle). I don't think it's reasonable to demand that he have gotten an additional 4 - 6 targets during a game where an RB went for over 200yds rushing, especially when seven of those 23 carries were for 10+. One of those carries went for over 50+, another 40+, and another 20+.

Canales' play calling wasn't the best, but it is developing as well. That's more than fair to criticize, but there's much better options to choose from than not feeding TMac in a game that resulted in a dub (with 200+ yards gained on the ground).

I think that rather than half the fanbase sticking their heads in the ground to avoid issues that there are some fans with their heads up their ass because all they seem to see is poo. 😛

post game box score analyzing doesn't tell the full or accurate story though.

He had 1 target in the entire second half, in a game that we were losing into the 4th Quarter.

Take names or how many targets any other individual player got out of it.  In what world does a team with such a talent gap between their top WR and the rest of their pass catching options make for smart play calling when that player gets 1 target in the 2nd half of a game they were losing for the majority of that time?

And again, I said I was wrong to bring up T-Mac in the OP, because it wasn't even about him.  His lack of 2nd half targets are just part of my issue with the play calling, it still felt very predictable and bland throughout the entire game, and THAT is my issue with Canales and where I've seen zero improvement from him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jfra78 said:

I would argue the only way the Panthers can win a game is to have 200 yards rushing

And if that's the case, then you shouldn't be throwing it 30 times.  But if you do, give your only legitimate WR threat more than 8 of those targets.

Because again, this isn't about T-Mac, it's about the overall play calling.

If we came out and just went very run heavy, with the play design and calling keeping the defense on their heels so we're constantly ripping of 5+ yard carries and sustaining long drives, then I'd be 100% okay with it and not upset with "my guy" not having a big game.

But we didn't do that, we kept running rather predictable plays, with bland play design that wasn't scheming players open or creating open running lanes to constantly get chunk yards in the run game.

It was Rico breaking off a few big plays, partially due to his breaking of tackles, that got him the 200+ yards, NOT Canales' play design and play calling.

Do you see the differentiation I'm talking about there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

In a sense, but I'd say it's more like we won because the Dolphins were just a worse team and because Evero made the adjustments needed to keep the game close enough to have a chance.  

Which, again, is my point and the same one I was making after the Falcons game.  

Winning in spite of your mistakes because the other team made worse mistakes, is not something that gets me excited moving forward, it just makes me more concerned, particularly when this coaching staff has already shown that they don't fix their mistakes moving forward week to week.

And, as I've said, I'm just done "enjoying wins" because we got a win, despite not actually looking good while doing so.

I want to get into the playoffs again, I want to contend for SB's.  To me, showing improvement and looking good, but still losing in the end, would make me happier and more excited for our future than backing into wins against bad teams in spite of our own issues.  Not a single thing about this win gives me hope about our long term future, but numerous things happened throughout the game that give me cause for concern.

And that's not me saying I want losses for draft positioning, I'd still rather win those games, but if it's look good and lose or look bad and win, it's an easy decision for me to look good but lose.

This season was never meant to be about winning games, it was about showing improvement, which is 100% something you can do in losses, just as you can show regression in wins.  I don't care about winning or losing this year, I care about improving as a team, record aside.

To me, this is a season where showing improvement is a win, showing regression (or the same mistakes) is a loss, the actual win or loss is irrelevant to me because we're not a contending team right now, that's when wins and losses matter.

I don’t think you are looking close forceful gs to like. I mean there were some things that happened in the game. Granted it is hard to assess when is against weak competition. 
Overall I agree. Wins can hide watts and looking closer at what those were and what needs to be done to eliminate them is gratifying for hardcore analytical perfectionist types. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

post game box score analyzing doesn't tell the full or accurate story though.

He had 1 target in the entire second half, in a game that we were losing into the 4th Quarter.

Take names or how many targets any other individual player got out of it.  In what world does a team with such a talent gap between their top WR and the rest of their pass catching options make for smart play calling when that player gets 1 target in the 2nd half of a game they were losing for the majority of that time?

And again, I said I was wrong to bring up T-Mac in the OP, because it wasn't even about him.  His lack of 2nd half targets are just part of my issue with the play calling, it still felt very predictable and bland throughout the entire game, and THAT is my issue with Canales and where I've seen zero improvement from him.

You overlook the risk of putting the ball in Bryce’s hands going by the day to that point while chewing up yard on the ground. He could have lost it with another fugup. I wouldn’t want to throw unless I had to. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, strato said:

You overlook the risk of putting the ball in Bryce’s hands going by the day to that point while chewing up yard on the ground. He could have lost it with another fugup. I wouldn’t want to throw unless I had to. 

Very fair, but also something I have a "I don't give a poo" attitude about, because I'm so over Bryce and as I've said, this year for me isn't about wins and losses, but improving as a team, which includes individual players getting better.

T-Mac, XL, Coker, Horn Jr, Sanders, and Evans aren't going to get better as pass catchers if they're just out there blocking all the time because we're too afraid of Bryce sucking and costing us games.

If we lose games because Bryce sucks and throws INT's (or fumbles without being touched lol), but all of our pass catching options got a couple extra targets to help expedite their improvement, it's a trade off I'd take 100 times out of 100.

As THAT would then help our future as a franchise, as when we get a real life NFL level QB in here next year, he's getting to throw to players who spent this year growing as players, not having wasted a year of improvement because we're too afraid to let the noodle arm throw the ball.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

post game box score analyzing doesn't tell the full or accurate story though.

He had 1 target in the entire second half, in a game that we were losing into the 4th Quarter.

Take names or how many targets any other individual player got out of it.  In what world does a team with such a talent gap between their top WR and the rest of their pass catching options make for smart play calling when that player gets 1 target in the 2nd half of a game they were losing for the majority of that time?

And again, I said I was wrong to bring up T-Mac in the OP, because it wasn't even about him.  His lack of 2nd half targets are just part of my issue with the play calling, it still felt very predictable and bland throughout the entire game, and THAT is my issue with Canales and where I've seen zero improvement from him.

You are correct that context matters. Let's look at the timing of those six (I accidentally counted one of Etienne's previously) runs of 10+

  • 11-yd run | Q2 10:43 (0 - 17)
  • 14-yd run | Q2 9:49 (0 - 17)
  • 25-yd run | Q2 1:47 (7 - 17)
  • 53-yd run | Q3 14:53 (13 - 17)
  • 43-yd run | Q4 9:09 (20 - 17)
  • 16-yd run | Q4 4:31 (27 - 24)

Q1 the offense basically walked onto the field and then immediately off thanks to Bryce's turnovers, but that's the only quarter that Dowdle didn't rip off a 10+ yard run. I think that's also where folks are basing most of their frustration... because Q1 was straight cheeks. By the half though, it was 10 - 17 with the Panthers set to get the ball to start the half. That's not a situation to get desperate and start flinging it everywhere.

Though not exactly related to the topic, I do have to give Evero credit where credit is due. There were halftime adjustments made that resulted in the Dolphins not being able to mindlessly abuse the defense over the middle. That's not even mentioning how they completely stuffed the Miami run game in the second half as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Very fair, but also something I have a "I don't give a poo" attitude about, because I'm so over Bryce and as I've said, this year for me isn't about wins and losses, but improving as a team, which includes individual players getting better.

T-Mac, XL, Coker, Horn Jr, Sanders, and Evans aren't going to get better as pass catchers if they're just out there blocking all the time because we're too afraid of Bryce sucking and costing us games.

If we lose games because Bryce sucks and throws INT's (or fumbles without being touched lol), but all of our pass catching options got a couple extra targets to help expedite their improvement, it's a trade off I'd take 100 times out of 100.

As THAT would then help our future as a franchise, as when we get a real life NFL level QB in here next year, he's getting to throw to players who spent this year growing as players, not having wasted a year of improvement because we're too afraid to let the noodle arm throw the ball.

Also, this post is EXACTLY what I wanted to move on from Bryce this offseason and sign Jameis.

Because he'd be slinging the ball all over the field and it would expedite the growth of all our young pass catchers, which to me, regardless of our record, would have made for a "winning" season. 

We all want our long term franchise QB, but if you can't get that, expediting the improvement of the rest of your roster is a solid consolation prize given the state of our franchise.

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Icege said:

You are correct that context matters. Let's look at the timing of those six (I accidentally counted one of Etienne's previously) runs of 10+

  • 11-yd run | Q2 10:43 (0 - 17)
  • 14-yd run | Q2 9:49 (0 - 17)
  • 25-yd run | Q2 1:47 (7 - 17)
  • 53-yd run | Q3 14:53 (13 - 17)
  • 43-yd run | Q4 9:09 (20 - 17)
  • 16-yd run | Q4 4:31 (27 - 24)

Q1 the offense basically walked onto the field and then immediately off thanks to Bryce's turnovers, but that's the only quarter that Dowdle didn't rip off a 10+ yard run. I think that's also where folks are basing most of their frustration... because Q1 was straight cheeks. By the half though, it was 10 - 17 with the Panthers set to get the ball to start the half. That's not a situation to get desperate and start flinging it everywhere.

Though not exactly related to the topic, I do have to give Evero credit where credit is due. There were halftime adjustments made that resulted in the Dolphins not being able to mindlessly abuse the defense over the middle. That's not even mentioning how they completely stuffed the Miami run game in the second half as well.

I agree about Evero deserving credit, but that's also unfortunately where I have to say something that I'm sure won't go over well either.

As that's great and all, but honestly, at this point, do we REALLY care about Evero showing improvement in his schemes as a coach other than making our players better individually?

If you're in the same boat as me, and 100% expecting a new HC next year, what our DC does this year with in game improvements is nice in the moment, but pointless in the long term since he'll then also be gone next year, no way a DC gets kept around for 3 HC's no matter what he did that previous year.

So yes, I give him credit and want us to show improvement there, but it's just unfortunately not something I'm going to get excited about either when looking forward into 2026 and beyond, which as I've clearly said, is really all I'm looking at this year, how it sets up our future as a franchise.

Now I'll also be fair there and say if you think Canales and co. will be back next year, then sure, it's something to get excited about, but I just can't see any way Tepper brings him back again.

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tukafan21 said:

I agree about Evero deserving credit, but that's also unfortunately where I have to say something that I'm sure won't go over well either.

As that's great and all, but honestly, at this point, do we REALLY care about Evero showing improvement as a coach other than making our players better individually?

If you're in the same boat as me, and 100% expecting a new HC next year, what our DC does this year with in game improvements is nice in the moment, but pointless in the long term since he'll then also be gone next year, no way a DC gets kept around for 3 HC's no matter what he did that previous year.

So yes, I give him credit, but it's just unfortunately not something I care about when looking forward into 2026 and beyond, which as I've clearly said, is really all I'm looking at this year, how it sets up our future as a franchise.

Oh, I'm not 100% expecting/demanding anything for next season. All that I want to see out of this season is progress, but I also understand that progress is not linear. I also understand that we've got a young team and coaching staff that are both developing. Expecting a winning record isn't reasonable at all, but I'll cheer for one all the same.

I think that this is where some of the more angsty fans keep themselves in a perpetual cycle of misery: high expectations leads to low resiliency. Folks can have high standards, and the Panthers + Bryce have not met those standards, but some of those standards are completely realistic (like Bryce has to be built like Cam in order to be successful).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Icege said:

Oh, I'm not 100% expecting/demanding anything for next season. All that I want to see out of this season is progress, but I also understand that progress is not linear. I also understand that we've got a young team and coaching staff that are both developing. Expecting a winning record isn't reasonable at all, but I'll cheer for one all the same.

I think that this is where some of the more angsty fans keep themselves in a perpetual cycle of misery: high expectations leads to low resiliency. Folks can have high standards, and the Panthers + Bryce have not met those standards, but some of those standards are completely realistic (like Bryce has to be built like Cam in order to be successful).

Yea, I've never had high expectations since we drafted Bryce, so it's not like I'm just upset about not meeting them.

I went into the season wanting to see player improvement and Canales' play design/calling improvement.

I'm now to the point where I 99% only care about seeing individual player improvement.  The 1% is that I unfortunately have to still hope to see Canales play calling improvement, because that is kinda critical for the improvement of all our young offensive players.

Offense is different from defense, you need good play designs and calls to show out.  On defense, everything can be a mess, but a great young player can still stand out and look great.  Our defense can be a mess but still have Horn locking down his guys on the outside, Scourton or Princely winning their pass rushing and pressuring the QB, DB swallowing up multiple blockers.

But it's very hard for any QB, RB, WR, or TE to individually shine when the play design and calling is poo.

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • all offense.  OT. TE. G. in rd 1 to 3    Rd 1 19. Carolina Panthers: Blake Miller, OT, Clemson   OFFENSIVE TACKLE  6Grade: 1st–2nd rd. Blake Miller Clemson Has the physical traits, football IQ and toughness that NFL teams will bet on every time. A former high-level wrestler, four-year starter and team captain, Miller plays with great consistency and has the football IQ to make up for his penchant for playing tall. He may never dominate, but he could start for a decade.   Overview Hometown: Strongsville, OH Birthday: February 25, 2004 Age: 22.2 Jersey: No. 78 High School: Strongsville Year: Fourth-year senior A four-year starter at Clemson, Miller was a mainstay at right tackle in former offensive coordinator Garrett Riley’s balanced gap/zone scheme. Highly recruited out of the Cleveland area, he earned a starting job from day one at Clemson and was a model of consistency for a mostly inconsistent college offense. He started all 54 games the past four seasons (most consecutive starts by a non-specialist in school history) and set the Clemson record for career offensive snaps played (3,778). Miller has a good mix of on-field talent and intangibles. In pass protection, he is quick off the ball, with the range to mirror rushers up the arc and a surprisingly sturdy anchor to answer different types of rushers. Miller also shows his foot quickness and physical demeanor to move bodies in the run game. He isn’t a great bender, though, and savvy NFL rushers will find some success using his aggressive techniques against him. His coaches rave about his smarts and football character (NFL scout: “I think he missed one practice in four years. The thought of letting down his coaches and teammates kills him.”). Dane’s takeawa Miller has an upright play style that could lead to issues vs. NFL competition, but he has the type of profile (physical traits, football IQ, competitive toughness) that teams will bet on every time. He should compete for a starting right tackle role as a rookie Combine stats Hover any column header to see its definition. STAT HT   WT   HAND   ARM   WING   BP   10   20   40   VJ   BJ   SS   3C   Combine 6′63/4 317 93/4 341/4 837/8 32 1.75 2.92 5.04 32 9′5 DNP DNP Pro Day 6′65/8 318 93/4 343/8 823/4 DNP DNP DNP DNP DNP DNP 4.65 7.75 Note: Combine: Limited workout (choice). Strengths Prototypical size — broad shoulders, outstanding arm length and athletic build Urgent in his setup and the way he operates (Duke edge rusher Wesley Williams said Miller was the best blocker he faced in 2025) Sets with a wide, sturdy base to withstand bull rushers down his middle Quick to respond and find balance after first contact in pass pro Has play strength to press rushers off him and keep them at bay Thudding, decisive hands as a run blocker; able to generate movement on drive blocks Shows off athleticism as a puller and on the move Voted a senior captain; member of the leadership council (NFL scout: “Love his focused mindset. Doesn’t cheat himself or his teammates.”) Remarkable toughness and consistently plays through bumps and bruises (broken wrist during 2025 spring practices required surgery, but he missed only one practice) Weaknesses Upright posture and inconsistent technique in pass protection Delivers adequate pop but doesn’t have overwhelming power to create knockback Can be late to draw hands from holster, opening his chest to rushers Gets caught leaning; requires a half-beat to get back in position NFL rushers will find some success setting him up Would like to see better control on perimeter to make it harder on defenders to avoid him Almost all (96.5 percent) of college snaps came at right tackle — lingering questions about his position flex   Rd 2  51. Carolina Panthers: Eli Stowers, TE, Vanderbilt   Eli Stowers Vanderbilt A mismatch-creating, explosive pass-catcher who must show he can block at the NFL level.     Overview Hometown: Denton, TX Birthday: April 15, 2003 Age: 23 Jersey: No. 9 High School: Guyer Year: Fifth-year senior A two-year starter at Vanderbilt (three-year starter overall), Stowers was a detached tight end (70.7 percent of snaps in the slot) in offensive coordinator Tim Beck’s run-heavy scheme. A highly recruited quarterback out of high school, Stowers began at Texas A&M and then New Mexico State but suffered multiple shoulder injuries, which forced him to change positions (Stowers: “I could never throw the same.”). With Diego Pavia as his quarterback for that transition, Stowers’ receiving production improved each of the past three seasons, including 769 receiving yards in 2025, tops among FBS tight ends and earning him All-America honors and the Mackey Award. An above-average athlete for the position, Stowers attacks defenders’ techniques and uses his quickness to consistently win one-on-one on slants, digs or seam balls. Because of the quarterback and scheme at Vanderbilt, he was asked to use his burst for quick windows and is unproven in other areas, although he has the speed to be more of a deep threat in a pro-style scheme. He delivered mixed results when asked to attack in traffic, but he has reliable hands and fluid adjustment skills. As a blocker, he has questionable physicality and sustain strength but competes when sealing or walling off defenders. Dane’s takeaway Stowers will need to prove himself as a serviceable blocker at the NFL level, but he is explosive as a pass catcher, and I love the way he maximizes his catch radius. He has mismatch-creating potential and can eventually develop into an NFL starter. Combine stats Hover any column header to see its definition. Scroll right to see more metrics. STATHTWTHANDARMWINGBP102040VJBJSS3C Combine6′33/423993/4325/8793/4DNP1.592.624.51451/211′3DNPDNP Pro Day6′31/224291/2327/879DNPDNPDNPDNPDNPDNPDNPDNP Note: Combine: Limited workout (choice). Strengths Broad-shouldered frame, with adequate bulk and room to add mass “Freaks List” athlete, which is reflected on the tape and in testing Graceful speed to attack down the seam or after the catch Fluid route runner who can sink and cut on command Quarterback background is an asset when reading coverages and finding windows Solid ball skills, especially for a former quarterback (3.9 percent career drop rate) Frequently widens catch radius to make proper adjustments and bail out his quarterback NFL scouts say he logs “countless hours” at the facility and wants to be coached “harder than the rest of the team” Team captain; driven attitude made him a leader at Vandy Led FBS tight ends in 2025 in receiving yards per game (64.1) Weaknesses Lean muscle structure — more linear body type than what some teams prefer Competes but has marginal play strength as a run blocker (21 percent of snaps came inline) Light in the pants and likely will never overwhelm defenders at point of attack Not consistently efficient blocking backside on the move Can do a better job selling route movements with his eyes/shoulders Want to see him be more aggressive finishing on the ball in traffic Durable after moving to tight end at Vandy but had two key injuries before that: injured right (throwing) shoulder in high school, then tore labrum during freshman year, which required postseason surgery (Jan. 2022); torn PCL and meniscus in left knee in 2019 state championship game, which required surgery (Jan. 2020).         rd 3 83. Carolina Panthers: Jalen Farmer, G, Kentucky   Jalen Farmer Kentucky An athletic boulder who projects as a starter in the right scheme.   Overview Hometown: Covington, GA Birthday: January 6, 2004 Age: 22.3 Jersey: No. 52 High School: Eastside Year: Fourth-year junior A two-year starter at Kentucky, Farmer lined up at right guard in former offensive coordinator Bush Hamdan’s balanced scheme with gap-run principles. He struggled to see the field in two seasons in Gainesville, but he got in better shape after transferring to Lexington and things started to click. He started all 24 games at right guard the past two seasons and impressed during Senior Bowl week. Farmer has outstanding size, play strength and presence. Using his long arms and leg drive, he can fit up and dump defenders in the run game. He has a stout anchor and heavy punch in pass protection and is quick to replace his hands and recover when he’s initially beaten. His pad-level issues pop up more than you’d like, and the nasty flashes need to become more consistent. Dane’s takeaway Farmer is an athletic boulder in pass protection and a bulldozer as a run blocker. He should continue to ascend with pro coaching. He has NFL starting-caliber ability, especially if he lands with a team that specializes in a downhill, smash-mouth run game. ADVERTISEMENT Combine stats Hover any column header to see its definition. STATHTWTHANDARMWINGBP102040VJBJSS3C Combine6′47/831291/4341/4825/8DNP1.752.884.93279′0DNPDNP Pro DayDNP320DNPDNPDNPDNPDNPDNPDNPDNPDNPDNPDNP Note: Combine: Limited workout (choice). Strengths Boasts an NFL body — broad chest, thick core and long arms Strong at the point and flashes a finishing demeanor Drives his legs in the run game to generate jarring power at contact Functional mobility to wall off defenders and execute pulls Stout as a pass blocker to gobble up bull rushers Can be caught leaning out front but recovery skills are impressive Forceful hands to put dents into defenders when he connects Flagged just once in 2025 (holding vs. Eastern Michigan) Served as a team captain in four games in 2025 (NFL scout: “Matured and took better care of his body after transferring.”) Started all 24 games the past two seasons Weaknesses Pops upright too often at the snap, with inconsistent sink Can be caught oversetting and crossed up by quickness Late with his hands — would like to see him tighten his carriage Tardy working through slow-developing pressures and games Can do better job refitting in the run game when he doesn’t initially establish leverage Inconsistencies redirecting and adjusting in space will be more noticeable vs. NFL athletes Position flexibility questions — 100 percent of college snaps came at right guard ADVERTISEMENT College stats Hover any column header to see its definition. YEARSCHOOLGPGSPOS 2022Florida20— 2023Florida20— 2024Kentucky1212RG 2025Kentucky1212RG 2022 Enrolled May 2022 2024 Enrolled January 2024 Background Jalen Farmer, who has a brother (Tristan), was born and raised in the Atlanta area by his mother (Kartella Fuller) and father (Shaun Farmer). While growing up in a football family, he was “always around” the game and had several cousins who played. Farmer started playing at age 7 and was a defensive lineman and linebacker before moving exclusively to the offensive line. Farmer enrolled at Eastside High School in Covington, Ga., which is the alma mater of NFL players Sheldon Rankins and Eric Stokes. He was a four-year letterman on varsity and started 11 games as a sophomore left guard in 2019. Farmer returned as the starting left guard as a junior in 2020 and helped Eastside to 10 wins. As a senior, he played left guard and defensive tackle and was named 2021 Class 5A Region 8 Lineman of the Year. Farmer posted 50 tackles, five tackles for loss, two sacks and one forced fumble as a senior, while adding a 1-yard rushing touchdown. He also lettered in track at Eastside, setting personal bests of 33 feet, 5 inches in the shot put and 61-4 in the discus.  A three-star recruit, Farmer was the 31st-ranked interior offensive lineman in the 2022 class and the No. 73 recruit in Georgia. After he became a starter as a sophomore, he picked up his first scholarship offer the following spring, from Georgia Tech (May 2020). Before his senior season, Farmer added an offer from Florida and committed to former head coach Dan Mullen, who then was fired a few months later. In the weeks before signing day, Farmer received a late flurry of offers from Alabama, Auburn, Kentucky and Mississippi State. But thanks to a strong push from new Gators head coach Billy Napier, Farmer stayed committed to his first choice. He was the 13th-ranked recruit in Napier’s first class in Gainesville. After two seasons buried on the depth chart, Farmer entered the transfer portal in December 2023 and committed to Kentucky.  He elected to skip his senior year and declare for the NFL Draft. Farmer accepted a late invite to the Senior Bowl. ADVERTISEMENT    
    • Unfortunately you just can't get through to some of these folks. The most successful season in Panthers history our #1 WR was Ted Ginn Jr who had just as many bone headed drops as he did highlight touchdowns. We already have the highest paid OL in the league two years running. We need a balanced roster more than anything else clearly.
    • https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/panthers/2026/04/06/nfl-draft-trade-rumors-panthers-chargers-quentin-johnston/89484524007/?link_source=ta_first_comment&taid=69d47a425bd91b00016ecfb1&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=trueanthem&utm_source=facebook Saw this hypothetical trade down scenario on Panthers wire where they had us dropping from 19 to 22 trade with the chargers which also knitted us the addition of Quinton Johnston personally I would take this deal because the players available at 22 and 19 are largely the same you could pick up maybe a tackle or even one of those defensive tackles that we liked like banks.  Grabbing a wide receiver who could probably replace legate and be a deep ball threat would be just what the doctor ordered in my opinion Yes he's kind of a reclamation project similar to legette but I think he's shown he can play and has more big game moments than legette. I think it would be like getting two for the price of one really allowing us to feel more holes getting a wide receiver and another spot filled for nothing but two or three draft spots.
×
×
  • Create New...