Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nice to win, but Tim Weaver of SI has key duds among the studs

TD alt

By TD alt,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Panthera onca Veteran

Panthera onca

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, TD alt said:

I mean, you guys can be satisfied all you want. The two teams that we have beaten have helped us win to varying degrees. I'm not going to be fooled again by hollow wins. We haven't actually beaten a decent team in years. If we actually beat a good team, then perhaps we'll have something legitimate to get hopeful about, but even then we have to string some quality wins together.

It is hard to win in the NFL. I’m never going to put an * next to a Dub.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ProcessBlue2 Grand Master

ProcessBlue2

Posted
Posted

These people get paid to watch no football and have complete stupid write-ups. I have been Evero’s biggest critic since he came here and yesterday was one of his best games. 19 yards rushing? Dave actually committed to the run, and that’s bad?

Dud#1- Bryce Young because any average QB wouldn’t turn the ball over at the mere sight of a defender and we probably would have won the game by 2 TDs without his dumbass turnovers.

Dud#2-Tim Weaver for writing such a shitty article. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      S Fowler Coker in, Legette out as wr2

      By frankw · Posted

      Coker has certainly earned it. Good for him.
    • kungfoodude
      Someone's not gonna be happy

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I don't think we don't call things aggressively, for a Canales offense, anyway. We don't have a QB who makes aggressive throws nor stresses defenses downfield. He is at a career low on 20+ attempts per game and his career 10-20 QB rating is abysmal.  That will always be a limiting factor IF you are looking for a high flying, downfield offense. I am not even that concerned about it, I just want to see effective offense and we decidedly do not possess that. A large chunk of that is Bryce. I think the second biggest chunk is Canales. All the other components(XL included) are fairly minor in comparison to those two things. I am an advocate of attempting to improve at QB. I am not focused on finding "The QB." We failed at that with Bryce. So let's just get better. If that's a one year vet or a draftee or a cheap trade or some combination of any/all, we should do that. We have to get that QB better. Bryce will fail in 2026 and we need to have REALISTIC options to take over when that happens. That ain't Andy Dalton or Hendon Hooker or Jack Plummer or Mike White or....you get the picture. Be serious about hedging that Bryce bet and not just having to make do if he struggles or gets injured.  My mind is definitely made up on Canales. It's year two and he hasn't improved much, nor do I think the bones of a good HC are there. Ron Rivera got to that point after two seasons and he was open about the changes he had to make and advice he got to make that leap in year 3. If we don't see the same after next year, how is he not just Brian Daboll?
    • TD alt
      S Fowler Coker in, Legette out as wr2

      By TD alt · Posted

      Not really buying it because T-mac faces stiffer competition week in and week out. 
×
×
  • Create New...