AI Analysis on ideal round to draft certain positions.

[PNW_PantherMan]

1 hour ago, csx said:

I think scouting and analyzing each draft class makes more sense than a scripted  approach 

Our organization would probably have a lot more success if we faced the reality in front of us rather than trying to mold it into what we'd like it to be.  Play the hand you are dealt essentially.

[csx]

Im always ok with taking a good linebacker but the ones we have arent playing nearly as bad as people are thinking.

[kungfoodude]

7 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Its a text aggregator.  It basically finds consensus on what already exists.  Its not intelligent lol.

Some of these LLM's are useful but not in the ways that 99% of the people use them.

[csx]

Much more useful for helping you with your own info and processes. 

[dep]

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Some of these LLM's are useful but not in the ways that 99% of the people use them.

!

[kungfoodude]

1 hour ago, csx said:

Much more useful for helping you with your own info and processes. 

This. Exactly what I was getting at.

[strato]

7 hours ago, csx said:

Im always ok with taking a good linebacker but the ones we have arent playing nearly as bad as people are thinking.

Okay so given that what would they look like with one of them playing next to a more elite type? I am thinking along the lines of Shaq and Luke.   Not that we will get a Luke but someone obviously better than Wallace next to Wallace. 
 

[PNW_PantherMan]

2 hours ago, csx said:

Much more useful for helping you with your own info and processes. 

Yea it’s invaluable in my job.  But the general public thinks it’s the genie from Pee Wees Playhouse.

[kungfoodude]

12 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Yea it’s invaluable in my job.  But the general public thinks it’s the genie from Pee Wees Playhouse.

It's asking the laziest questions to one of the dumber people you know, essentially. With just as little context.

[kungfoodude]

This also fits the modern context of "doing your own research."

Step 1: Type in my opinion into search engine/social media/YouTube

Step 2: Wait for algorithms to serve up what I want to hear/read to validate my opinion.

Step 3: Ignore all other data.

[strato]

23 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

This also fits the modern context of "doing your own research."

Step 1: Type in my opinion into search engine/social media/YouTube

Step 2: Wait for algorithms to serve up what I want to hear/read to validate my opinion.

Step 3: Ignore all other data.

Damn we have been way ahead of the times here. Who knew. 
 

[toldozer]

On 10/24/2025 at 5:33 AM, kungfoodude said:

There have been real, actual statistical analysis of these sort of things. ChatGPT spit out a dimestore version of those.

People, stop relying on current AI for information. It's atrociously bad.

I had a neighbor of a customer come out screaming that we were breaking city ordinance. I said show it to me, this fool pulls out his phone and right at the top says AI overview. Did you know sir that there are government websites where you can find city ordinances? He looked completely baffled that AI overview is indeed not law. He told me he was going to go find the ordinance and I never saw him again.