Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Lito worth a look?

Carolina_Pride

By Carolina_Pride,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Carolina_Pride Newbie

Carolina_Pride

Posted
Posted

I know many ppl will think this is dumb to even post but still wanna get some thoughts about it:

Carolina tags Peppers and send him to Philly for Lito and 2nd rounder...or IDK if this is possible but Lito and 1st rounder...I mean Lito is 3rd string but only cause htey have two hter great cb's..its not like he is a bum but still an upgrade to Lucas and Marshall.

2nd Round picks:

(52)-DE-P.Kruger-Utah

(59)-DT-E. Hood-Mizz.

and if we some how get 1st rounder- but we get our original pick back

(28)-T. Jackson(LSU)/M. Johnson(GT)-fills hole of Pep Trade

(59)-E. Hood-Mizz.

I think the first option is really only the one that could work out but it would help fill our top 3 needs. Shepphard is more reliable than Lucas and Marshall. I also like option 1 better cause it saves money and I think we should also give Chris Canty (UFA) a look. Doubt he gets signed back with Ware getting most the cap space. If we could Lito, Canty, Kruger, and Hood we would have depth plus talent.

Thoughts???????/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Link Newbie

The Link

Posted
Posted

I know many ppl will think this is dumb to even post but still wanna get some thoughts about it:

Carolina tags Peppers and send him to Philly for Lito and 2nd rounder...or IDK if this is possible but Lito and 1st rounder...I mean Lito is 3rd string but only cause htey have two hter great cb's..its not like he is a bum but still an upgrade to Lucas and Marshall.

2nd Round picks:

(52)-DE-P.Kruger-Utah

(59)-DT-E. Hood-Mizz.

and if we some how get 1st rounder- but we get our original pick back

(28)-T. Jackson(LSU)/M. Johnson(GT)-fills hole of Pep Trade

(59)-E. Hood-Mizz.

I think the first option is really only the one that could work out but it would help fill our top 3 needs. Shepphard is more reliable than Lucas and Marshall. I also like option 1 better cause it saves money and I think we should also give Chris Canty (UFA) a look. Doubt he gets signed back with Ware getting most the cap space. If we could Lito, Canty, Kruger, and Hood we would have depth plus talent.

Thoughts???????/

We probably won't be able to afford Lito, and both of those DE's you mentioned drafting will be gone before we can get them, even with our original pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SuperCat Newbie

SuperCat

Posted
Posted

Lito is a very good player..better than any of our current corners. May not have to make this particular trade for him though. May be able to swap him for a 2nd or 3rd pick if Philly doesn't outright release him.

We should NOT trade JP to Philly!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
fitty76 Apprentice

fitty76

Posted
Posted

Lito is a very good player..better than any of our current corners. May not have to make this particular trade for him though. May be able to swap him for a 2nd or 3rd pick if Philly doesn't outright release him.

We should NOT trade JP to Philly!!!!!

He's better than Lucas. He's not better than Gamble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

If Peppers is serious about going to a 3-4 that rules out Philly totally. With Jim Johnson very sick it is also unclear what the defense will look like next year. So I doubt if Philly is on the list unless Peppers relents and agrees to play in a 4-3 as a DE instead of OLB in a 3-4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
magnus Rookie

magnus

Posted
Posted

any pick + player trade is going to be less likely, and any player traded is going to diminish and make less certain the value. If it's a first, or Sheppard and a 2nd, I'm going to take the first.

I do like the idea of getting Sheppard, though, if it were less costly than it will inevitably be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

any pick + player trade is going to be less likely, and any player traded is going to diminish and make less certain the value. If it's a first, or Sheppard and a 2nd, I'm going to take the first.

I do like the idea of getting Sheppard, though, if it were less costly than it will inevitably be.

I'm not that high on Sheppard.

I wouldn't scream if we picked him up, but in a trade for Peppers I'd also want a first, plus more, and I don't see the Eagles taking those terms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...