Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Okay gentlemen, REAL talk...


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

See above...

We won. But why did we win? Did we win because Bryce led a commanding offense all day? Or, did we win because of 3 extremely well timed turnovers that resulted in a huge swing in points? I'm going with the latter. Bryce did his part, but he did not dominate this game the way you are trying to make it sound. 

We beat the Rams on this given Sunday. 

He beat a 4-8 Atlanta team. Put up his best game statistically against them aided by 250 YAC. Wouldn't exactly call that a great team, even though they had the best passing D at that time. 

We beat GB. He was forgettable and the defense held GB to 13 points with 6 trips into the red zone

We beat the Jets. Very good team? 13 points. Offensive juggernaut performance there

Dallas and Miami - Rico does something not seen in the NFL in 14 years. 500 yards of offense by a RB. Our offense ran through him. More rushing yards than passing. Bryce was riding his coat tails against the 2 worst defenses in the NFL. 

1st ATL win 30-0 - Again, forgettable Bryce performance. Defense destroyed Penix and he imploded. 

We won't agree on this at all. We've beaten the Rams with 3 key defensive turnovers resulting in a huge point swing on Stafford's worst performance of the year and GB with our defense making huge defensive stands in the red zone in really bad weather. 

Nothing he's done I wouldn't expect from a mid level starting QB in the NFL. But remember. The highs got higher last year and then he went swimming in the sewer to start this year. Insert another mid tier QB behind this line with our RBs and our record is the same if not better. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Still is winning does not hide the fact that our offense would be better if Bryce was not our QB. 

No, but winning blunts and decreases any motivation the team might have to replace him.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

you are arguing with the same dude that until the bitter end argued that Fitterer was a good gm keep that in mind

Wrong. I said he needed more time.

That was until it came out that he'd been undermining Reich. At that point, I said toss him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Wrong. I said he needed more time.

That was until it came out that he'd been undermining Reich. At that point, I said toss him. 

Sure you did buddy, you are never going to live that down arguing with folks that Fitterer was a good gm.  I mean that was your shtick for a good year when it was plain as day he fuging sucked.  Time or not he fuging sucked and it still shows to this day 

 

and you are really going to say with a straight face you didnt defend him at every turn?  come on man just own it, we have the receipts you know

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

We won. But why did we win? Did we win because Bryce led a commanding offense all day? Or, did we win because of 3 extremely well timed turnovers that resulted in a huge swing in points? I'm going with the latter. Bryce did his part, but he did not dominate this game the way you are trying to make it sound. 

We beat the Rams on this given Sunday. 

He beat a 4-8 Atlanta team. Put up his best game statistically against them aided by 250 YAC. Wouldn't exactly call that a great team, even though they had the best passing D at that time. 

We beat GB. He was forgettable and the defense held GB to 13 points with 6 trips into the red zone

We beat the Jets. Very good team? 13 points. Offensive juggernaut performance there

Dallas and Miami - Rico does something not seen in the NFL in 14 years. 500 yards of offense by a RB. Our offense ran through him. More rushing yards than passing. Bryce was riding his coat tails against the 2 worst defenses in the NFL. 

1st ATL win 30-0 - Again, forgettable Bryce performance. Defense destroyed Penix and he imploded. 

We won't agree on this at all. We've beaten the Rams with 3 key defensive turnovers resulting in a huge point swing on Stafford's worst performance of the year and GB with our defense making huge defensive stands in the red zone in really bad weather. 

Nothing he's done I wouldn't expect from a mid level starting QB in the NFL. But remember. The highs got higher last year and then he went swimming in the sewer to start this year. Insert another mid tier QB behind this line with our RBs and our record is the same if not better. 

Same slant as before, dude.

Look, it doesn't matter what mental gymnastics you apply to the story. You cannot remove Bryce from being a part of why we won these games.

He did his job. In some games better than others? Yes, but the end result still matters.

The wins are team wins.

The losses are team losses 

And Bryce plays a key role in the team.

Like I said earlier, continue arguing that he should be replaced. I'm doing that as well. 

But denying reality doesn't help your argument. It actually weakens it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is interesting how the games changed over the past 10-15 years. I mainly started watching football in like 2010 or so. I feel like every week there were QBs throwing for 400+, 300 yards was a pedestrian day it felt like. Now even the best qbs dont throw for 300 super often it feels.
    • I dont necessarily disagree just really curious as to why that is?  He either must be a dunce, a bad teammate or must be horrendous in practice because I thought he showed promise at least in his 2nd year
    • Its AI but here goes nothing:   Trevor Lawrence's catchable ball statistics vary by situation, with his highest rate being 74.1%74.1 % 74.1% in a clean pocket and his lowest on deep balls at 41.2%41.2 % 41.2% . When pressured, his catchable pass rate is 51.6%51.6 % 51.6% , and it's 55.2%55.2 % 55.2% on play-action plays. Lawrence has also been impacted by a high receiver drop rate, which makes it appear as if he is more inaccurate than he is.  Catchable pass rate by situation  Clean pocket: 74.1%74.1 % 74.1% (ranks 28th out of 32 quarterbacks) Deep balls: 41.2%41.2 % 41.2% (ranks 23rd out of 32 quarterbacks) When pressured: 51.6%51.6 % 51.6% (ranks 15th out of 32 quarterbacks) On play action: 55.2%55.2 % 55.2% (ranks 28th out of 32 quarterbacks) Red zone: 65.1%65.1 % 65.1% (ranks 15th out of 32 quarterbacks) When blitzed: 69.2%69.2 % 69.2% (ranks 19th out of 32 quarterbacks)    Compared to:   Bryce Young's catchable ball stats vary by situation, with a high catchable pass rate of 73.2%73.2 % 73.2% in a clean pocket (30th in the NFL) and a 60%60 % 60% rate on deep throws (20+ air yards), which was 10th in the NFL in 2024. However, his pressured and blitzed catchable rates were lower at 39.7%39.7 % 39.7% (31st) and 60.3%60.3 % 60.3% (29th), respectively.  By situation  Clean pocket: 73.2%73.2 % 73.2% catchable pass rate (30th in NFL) Deep ball (20+ air yards): 60%60 % 60% catchable pass rate (10th in NFL in 2024) Pressure: 39.7%39.7 % 39.7% catchable pass rate (31st in NFL) Blitzed: 60.3%60.3 % 60.3% catchable pass rate (29th in NFL) Red zone: 62.5%62.5 % 62.5% catchable pass rate (22nd in NFL) 
×
×
  • Create New...