Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

First 4 NFL starts - Tyler Shough


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, TN05 said:

Through 6 games this guy is 2-4, averaging 202 yards a game with 7 touchdowns and 7 turnovers. His AY/A (5.91) is worse than Bryce (6.31), as are his yards per completion (10.1 vs 10.2).

He's worse than Bryce in basically every category except for yards (he's averaging 202, Bryce is averaging 195 this year) and completion percentage (65% vs 63%). Oh, and he's losing two-thirds of his games (2-4).

You can't think Bryce is a bad QB and that Shough is good.

Your missing the real stat. Shough is 6.5" -  Bryce is 5'10". That's all you need to know.

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CRA said:

he is 2-3 as a starter

in his starts he is 67% at 216 per game.  That's as a freaking rookie on a bad team vs a 3rd year guy with a pretty solid group around him.  

you got to separate out starts vs the pure per game average because a game with like 2 pass attempts and zero yards completely fugs up the per game stats and doesn't give you a good look

He played most of another game and lost it. I didn’t count the game with 0 yards (because that would be ridiculous). If I did, his stats would be lower than Bryce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, TN05 said:

He played most of another game and lost it. I didn’t count the game with 0 yards (because that would be ridiculous). If I did, his stats would be lower than Bryce.

well, you will have to excuse me with not crediting wins or losses to players that factually aren't credited to them.   That's not what we do. 

Rattler had 21 pass attempts that game....which is more pass attempts than Bryce Young had in the GB or Rams game.  That wasn't a Shough game.  The 2nd round rookie came in for Saints final drive of the 3rd quarter down multiple scores.    

so yeah, if you want to be objective about Shough this year, you evaluate him as a starter.    Gameplans on both sides of the ball for him.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

well, you will have to excuse me with not crediting wins or losses to players that factually aren't credited to them.   That's not what we do. 

Rattler had 21 pass attempts that game....which is more pass attempts than Bryce Young had in the GB or Rams game.  That wasn't a Shough game.  The 2nd round rookie came in for Saints final drive of the 3rd quarter down multiple scores.    

so yeah, if you want to be objective about Shough this year, you evaluate him as a starter.    Gameplans on both sides of the ball for him.  

Imagine gassing up a 2-4 QB for a terrible division rival with stats worse than our QB in every category except raw yards per game

Edited by TN05
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TN05 said:

Imagine gassing up a 2-4 QB for a terrible division rival with stats worse than our QB in every category except raw yards per game

imagine thinking that talking about our next opponent is "gassing up" someone.... and then lying about basic info because it's not flattering to the league's worst starting QB since he arrived. 

as a starter he is 2-3 (just a fact)

as a starter vs Bryce this year

pass yards per game - Shough

rush yards per game - Shough

comp % - Shough 

QB rating - Shough

yards/per attempt - Shough

and Shough is only good for a 2nd round rookie thrust into the gig on a bad team.   He is getting graded on a curve of what he is.  And he won the last head to head vs us, and looked like the best QB on the field that day.  

there are a billion red flags when it comes to Bryce Young.  This is just another.  

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, CRA said:

And our RBs are better.  Not sure what cherry picking out our highest paid OL in the NFL isn’t a full strength…..has to do with the Saints kid doing what he is doing though.  Thats just exists on its on.  Good job by a rookie on a weak roster.  We have seen rookies on weak rosters deliver horrific play 

Our RBs sure didn't look better last time.

And given that you cite our OL injuries as if they weren't considered, I'm curious what you think the metaphor "MASH unit of an OL"  meant exactly 🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Our RBs sure didn't look better last time.

And given that you cite our OL injuries as if they weren't considered, I'm curious what you think the metaphor "MASH unit of an OL"  meant exactly 🤔

Here is where you are…

for purely the sake of arguing with me you are willing to suggest the 2025 Saints RBs might not be better than the 2025 Panthers RBs lol

Saints have the 28th ranked rush attack.  We are top 10.   The Saints haven’t had a 100 yard rusher the entire season.  We have seen franchise best performances in a franchise known for running the rock.

and see above for what our OL is also clearly better than the Saints.  Hell, Canales being forced into some mashups has often made it even stronger at times 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CRA said:

Here is where you are…

for purely the sake of arguing with me you are willing to suggest the 2025 Saints RBs might not be better than the 2025 Panthers RBs lol

Saints have the 28th ranked rush attack.  We are top 10.   The Saints haven’t had a 100 yard rusher the entire season.  We have seen franchise best performances in a franchise known for running the rock.

and see above for what our OL is also clearly better than the Saints.  Hell, Canales being forced into some mashups has often made it even stronger at times 

Yeah and Phil Snow has the second best defense in the league 😄

I'm reminded of 2015 where we used to build up huge leads in the first half just to wind up winning by less than a single score because our second half performance stunk.

We built up some pretty good rushing stats over an early stretch in the year. Didn't really help us against the Saints though, or in some of our other losses.

Hell, go back and look at past Super Bowl winners. Is it always the team that's ranked first in one category or another? After all, stat rankings always tell you who the best team is, right? 🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yeah and Phil Snow has the second best defense in the league 😄

I'm reminded of 2015 where we used to build up huge leads in the first half just to wind up winning by less than a single score because our second half performance stunk.

We built up some pretty good rushing stats over an early stretch in the year. Didn't really help us against the Saints though, or in some of our other losses.

Hell, go back and look at past Super Bowl winners. Is it always the team that's ranked first in one category or another? After all, stat rankings always tell you who the best team is, right? 🤔

So...yeah, the snark and whataboutism really just works as a dodge here.  So is the, but did it win us this game rhetoric or stats don't always tell the truth (because that not actually in play in this specific convo) 

So again, I'll lay it out one last time....are you actually willing to argue for the sake of arguing the Saints RBs in 2025 are better than ours?   and their OL?  Is that what you are doing here.  

  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, CRA said:

So...yeah, the snark and whataboutism really just works as a dodge here.  So is the, but did it win us this game rhetoric or stats don't always tell the truth (because that not actually in play in this specific convo) 

So again, I'll lay it out one last time....are you actually willing to argue for the sake of arguing the Saints RBs in 2025 are better than ours?   and their OL?  Is that what you are doing here.  

How many people outside this board do you think would pick Chubba and banged up Rico ovwr Alvan Kamara?

At this stage of the season, and operating in the real world rather than off of a spreadsheet, they outperformed us in direct competition and just beat the team leading the division.

Is our OL banged up? Sure. So is theirs.

Is anybody gonna make any allowances for that? Maybe say "You know what? You guys take some time to heal and we'll play when you're at full strength" Kinda doubt it.

Where we rank over a season's worth of stats doesn'tnmean sh-t when the teams take the field.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

How many people outside this board do you think would pick Chubba and banged up Rico ovwr Alvan Kamara?

At this stage of the season, and operating in the real world rather than off of a spreadsheet, they outperformed us in direct competition and just beat the team leading the division.

Is our OL banged up? Sure. So is theirs.

Is anybody gonna make any allowances for that? Maybe say "You know what? You guys take some time to heal and we'll play when you're at full strength" Kinda doubt it.

Where we rank over a season's worth of stats doesn'tnmean sh-t when the teams take the field.

So I think I have unlocked your puzzle.  Bryce has better talent around him than Shough.  But you feel the need to argue against me.....so you are presenting that if the stars align just right on 12/14/2025 you might get to say on one particular day Shough has better talent around him....even though that isn't an accurate reflection of anything we have witnessed on the year w/ what the Panthers and Saints have supported their QB with. 

I think most football savvy people would take 2025 Rico/Hubbard over the present day variant of Kamara.  Only thing in Rico's way of late is Canales via bad gameplans or fixation of putting Rico in his place for criticizing his play calling in public. 

Kamara is 30.  Worst season of his career.  Worst ypc of his career.   1 rush TDs.  Zero 100 yard ush games.  You being extremely generous for 1 Saints RB and very harsh on a duo of Panther RBs for this arguement.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CRA said:

imagine thinking that talking about our next opponent is "gassing up" someone.... and then lying about basic info because it's not flattering to the league's worst starting QB since he arrived. 

as a starter he is 2-3 (just a fact)

as a starter vs Bryce this year

pass yards per game - Shough

rush yards per game - Shough

comp % - Shough 

QB rating - Shough

yards/per attempt - Shough

and Shough is only good for a 2nd round rookie thrust into the gig on a bad team.   He is getting graded on a curve of what he is.  And he won the last head to head vs us, and looked like the best QB on the field that day.  

there are a billion red flags when it comes to Bryce Young.  This is just another.  

The fact you're having to rely on "rushing yards per game" (he is averaging 18, Bryce is averaging 10) here is really telling lmao.

I already gave the clear advanced differences. Shough is playing worse than Bryce. You are literally gassing up a worse, 2-4 QB for a rival team and I find that incredibly funny.

Edited by TN05
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

So I think I have unlocked your puzzle.  Bryce has better talent around him than Shough.  But you feel the need to argue against me.....so you are presenting that if the stars align just right on 12/14/2025 you might get to say on one particular day Shough has better talent around him....even though that isn't an accurate reflection of anything we have witnessed on the year w/ what the Panthers and Saints have supported their QB with. 

I think most football savvy people would take 2025 Rico/Hubbard over the present day variant of Kamara.  Only thing in Rico's way of late is Canales via bad gameplans or fixation of putting Rico in his place for criticizing his play calling in public. 

Kamara is certainly later in his career but he's not exactly chopped liver. Again, outside this fanbase i doubt he'd lose that contest.

As far as other comparisons:

I'd put Tet McMillan equal with Chris Olave, though I think McMillan might be hitting a bit of a rookie wall. Others may say McMillan is promising but not to that level just yet.

Damian Lewis is equal to or better than Dillon Radunz and Ickey is better than Kelvin Banks, though Banks even as a rookie ain't bad. The left side of our OL wins, but not in a blowout.

On the other side, if he were fully healthy I could argue Taylor Moton over Taliese Fuaga but I don't think he is. The Saints likely take that one for now at least, and probably in the future since Fuaga is younger.

Jalen Coker is getting back to form. Putting him over Dante Perris right now is probably a bit of a stretch but he's still doing well.

So this far, fairly comparable / even.

But here's where it starts to get bad...

Whoever's starting at center this week vs Luke Fortner? Eeehhh, no.

Right guard of the week against Cesar Ruiz? Uh uh.

Any of our TEs vs Juwan Johnson? Don't think so.

Xavier Legette over anybody at all? Oy 😖

So yeah, overall at this point Shough has a better supporting cast around him.

Once Hunt and others are healthy again it becomes a better argument, but as mentioned the league isn't willing to postpone things so we can be at our best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, TN05 said:

The fact you're having to rely on "rushing yards per game" (he is averaging 18, Bryce is averaging 10) here is really telling lmao.

I already gave the clear advanced differences. Shough is playing worse than Bryce. You are literally gassing up a worse, 2-4 QB for a rival team and I find that incredibly funny.

I'm not relying on rushing yards per game.  Which is why I presented you with a host of different offensive production and efficiency stats.   You said there was only one.  I shared several. You just cherry picked one of the many shared out.   

and you are still intentionally distorting the most basic facts like wins/losses lol. 

the only gassing up being done here is about Bryce.  Most of the thread is talking about Shough(our next opponent) in very normal terms. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...