Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Great story about Nicole Tepper & Dave on cbs, Saturday morning yesterday


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, cranky said:

Maybe. But Tepper donated 67 million to Carnegie Mellon when he was in Pittsburg and has given somewhere around 23 million here I believe. I am sure some of it is PR, but knowing where he came from, I believe part of it is just him wanting to give back. 

 

 

Philanthropy is what rich people do to convince the unwashed masses not to raise their taxes (or grab their pitchforks) nothing more.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Stumpy said:

Philanthropy is what rich people do to convince the unwashed masses not to raise their taxes (or grab their pitchforks) nothing more.

Nah, they don't need to do that. They just pay lobbyist and politicians to write the laws they want and then they use media (Fakebook, X, TikTok, Fox News, NY Times, etc) to keep us unwashed masses fighting between ourselves over matters that really don't matter instead of the things that do.

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

cranky - Goddamnit he is better than Pat mahomes and Baker mayfield, the (random) stats show it

George Washingstan said father, I cannot tell a lie. I picked my stats out of a cherry tree. 

Or something like that. 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, cranky said:

Nah, they don't need to do that. They just pay lobbyist and politicians to write the laws they want and then they use media (Fakebook, X, TikTok, Fox News, NY Times, etc) to keep us unwashed masses fighting between ourselves over matters that really don't matter instead of the things that do.

If the Teppers actually cared, they could've given each of the roughly 6000 families in NC whose houses were lost in the floods $1.5m a piece to rebuild and still have a $10 billion nest egg to fall back on. Instead they funneled the equivalent of pocket change through layers of greasy bureaucracy designed to dilute the impact as much as possible.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Stumpy said:

If the Teppers actually cared, they could've given each of the roughly 6000 families in NC whose houses were lost in the floods $1.5m a piece to rebuild and still have a $10 billion nest egg to fall back on. Instead they funneled the equivalent of pocket change through layers of greasy bureaucracy designed to dilute the impact as much as possible.

So could our govt with tax dollars vs billions thrown here and there 

but that is a grievance for another forum

i dont know the Tepper’s  motives.  

i do know how they chose to spend their personal money is up to them

They did something to help. Thats all i know 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...