Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

1 shot 1 goal tracker


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

It happened again tonight fyi. We are at 8 

 

4 hours ago, Anybodyhome said:

Don't think so. Was watching the big board at the game. I think it was the 3rd SOG.

But your point is taken.

 

3 hours ago, Kuhndog94 said:

Big board said 1 SOG after the score. 100%. 

ESPN play-by-play has a save at 0:16, with the goal coming two and a half minutes later.

Screenshot_20260204_033446_Chrome.thumb.jpg.aced5364fa43eb7b00c18d2ac897b2b8.jpg

2 shots, 1 goal... not quite the "Not So Ready Freddie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Stumpy said:

 

 

ESPN play-by-play has a save at 0:16, with the goal coming two and a half minutes later.

Screenshot_20260204_033446_Chrome.thumb.jpg.aced5364fa43eb7b00c18d2ac897b2b8.jpg

2 shots, 1 goal... not quite the "Not So Ready Freddie."

I don’t go back and look at the espn but there live it definitely said 1 shot 1 goal when it happened. I guess they had not added them yet. Still allowing goals that early is rough. Blue line is a total disaster still. Even with Slavin back. Miller and Nikishin keep making mistakes after mistakes. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It wasn't a his sack production, it was about his skill set, build, and scheme fit. He's a six foot tall 280 pound DT. He's best used as an interior pass rushing specialist. He can't play the nose in a 3-4 and he doesn't have the length or burst to play he end either. He just wasn't a scheme fit. He'd be a good roster piece as a rotational pass rushing specialist DT to bring in on passing downs in an even defensive front. But you can't hand out a 3 year/$45M contract for that either. Tha type of contract means you have to try to find starter snap numbers for him and that's a problem in a 3-4 front. Hell, it's a problem in a 4-3 front too. That's why the Chiefs were willing to let him walk.
    • Quite a few people argued we way overpaid high end starter money for a guy that was basically a capable backup at best. It was a bad move facilitated by a need to save face after missing out on Williams. It is what it is man. We aren't being paid to carry Dan Morgan's water. It'll be alright.
    • Who else at DT was available coming off a 6.5 sack season, that was relatively affordable?  We took the Milton Williams money and added Turk AND Bobby Brown III. You can't predict soft tissue, and surgery in this case. Part of the business.  
×
×
  • Create New...