Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bill Parcells' 4 rules for Drafting a QB


MHS831

Recommended Posts

http://smartfootball.com/quarterbacking/bill-parcells-four-rules-for-drafting-a-quarterback

1.He must be a senior, because you need time and maturity to develop into a good professional quarterback.

2.He must be a graduate, because you want someone who takes his responsibilities seriously.

3.He must be a three-year starter, because you need to make sure his success wasn’t ephemeral and that he has lived as “the guy” for some period of time.

4.He must have at least 23 wins, because the big passing numbers must come in the context of winning games.

Blatant Homerism also notes that, of the seven quarterbacks to win a Super Bowl in the 2000s, five — Drew Brees, Ben Roethlisberger, Eli Manning, Peyton Manning and Trent Dilfer — met all four requirements when drafted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is new information.

So Parcells doesn't know what he is talking about because you deem his perspective invalid, antiquated, dated, or you really have never seen this before? Because Parcells really needs your endorsement here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This same bit was discussed in a newton article I read yesterday. It showed recent history from a different angle, mentioning that something like 5 or 6 first round qbs of this decade fit that profile and using it as an example of how it worka (implying those qbs are good). But if you look at the list (I'm using my phone ATM, I'll look up the article when I get home from work) only 1 or 2 of them are actually good. Big Ben and Phillip rivers. The others were like David garrard, Matt leinart, Eli manning and a couple other mid tier guys. That fact disproved the method just as much as the super bowl fact proves it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andrew Luck would have met none of these requirements if he came out.

Ah, but Luck didn't come out this year. And by the time he does, he likely will meet pretty much all of them.

On the rules themselves though, I'm not sure I buy the "must be a senior" or "must be a graduate" argument anymore. I get why he says it, and there's logic to it, but there are guys who have come out as juniors and been successful.

Don't know that I buy into "three year starter" either because they're rare these days, but I'd agree that a two-year starter is better than a one-year starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...