Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

League won’t negotiate with class counsel


The Saltman

Recommended Posts

dkaplanSBJ daniel kaplan

Nfl officials say they will not negotiate with class counsel, nflpa letter sent by david feher

dkaplanSBJ daniel kaplan

Nfl officials says the nflpa letter sent today was asking for settlement discussions, not to return to negotiating table
Link to comment
Share on other sites

what the fug does this even mean?

After a week of indicating a desire to return to the bargaining table, the NFL now has a clear chance to negotiate a new deal.

And the NFL is refusing to proceed.

Seriously.

Daniel Kaplan of SportsBusiness Journal reports that the league will not negotiate with the lawyers representing the class action that has been filed against the NFL following decertification of the union.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/03/21/league-wont-negotiate-with-class-counsel/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why should they? Settlement of a lawsuit imlpies some level of admittance to wrong doing. The players over-reached by walking away from talks, decertifying and starting their lawsuit. And with Doty not on the case, the owners clearly have the upperhand.

As far as tactics go, the NFLPA* is trying to use this as show of unwillingness to negotiate. When in fact, since there is no union, many of the collective bargaining laws no longer apply. The owners know this.

Smith is failing and is reaching for anything now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what the fug does this even mean?

it means the NFLPA sent a note that said:

"our penis is this big:

8==================D "

and then the owners responded with this note:

"oh yeah? well ours is THIS BIG:

8=====================================D~~~~

and we ***** on you so nah nah nah nah"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why should they? Settlement of a lawsuit imlpies some level of admittance to wrong doing. The players over-reached by walking away from talks, decertifying and starting their lawsuit. And with Doty not on the case, the owners clearly have the upperhand.

As far as tactics go, the NFLPA* is trying to use this as show of unwillingness to negotiate. When in fact, since there is no union, many of the collective bargaining laws no longer apply. The owners know this.

Smith is failing and is reaching for anything now.

Doty not being the judge means little. sure Doty went with the players on several ocasions, but the reality was that he was a pretty fair judge, and the owners simply were wrong. the law is the law, and it doesn't give the owners much leverage besides delay tactics. If the players can hold out they will probably eventually "win" what happens then, if we ever get there, will be interesting to see

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doty not being the judge means little. sure Doty went with the players on several ocasions, but the reality was that he was a pretty fair judge, and the owners simply were wrong. the law is the law, and it doesn't give the owners much leverage besides delay tactics. If the players can hold out they will probably eventually "win" what happens then, if we ever get there, will be interesting to see

Yeah, he's so fair the NFL has accused him of bias.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?id=3288568

What a prophetic article.

The owners are particularly angry about comments Doty made in a recent Sports Business Journal interview, in which Doty said, "[NFL owners] pretend they're getting beaten around. Well, they did, initially, but they had a position that was not legally sound … I think if you ask Paul Tagliabue [former commissioner], he would say, 'the whole thing has come out our way.' Because even though the owners complain about it, all they've done is make tons of money."

These statements, the owners say, demonstrate Doty's bias against them and in favor of the players. Upshaw and the players reply that Doty was talking only about the earlier litigation that led to the 1993 agreement and that there is no indication of bias in any of the statements.

The statements to the media and the Minnesota Nice sessions "demonstrate bias," say the owners, and they want Doty to walk away from any further role in the disputes.

So yes... you can say the "Law is the law", but ALL laws are subject to interpretation in a court setting. So far Doty's intpretations have been anti-NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Players did the same thing saying they don't want to talk to Goodell or Pash but the owners themselves. The owners are saying they don't want to talk to the lawyers and settle a class action suit but want to talk to the players and negotiate the CBA. Looks more like a non-story to me.

But on that note, screw them both. Both need a paycut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
    • Football is not the professional sport where timidness and apprehension are justly rewarded. 
    • Bryce Young had a super high floor definitely at least won't be a bust safe pick we allegedly had seen in some time.......and went on to have one of the worst rookie seasons of all time.  They are all lotto picks.  And that is especially true for whatever they will be day 1 in the NFL.  I don't think Tmac is a sure thing year 1.  It's not like we watched him do his thing in the SEC.  He was a PAC12 guy.  I'm sure it will take time
×
×
  • Create New...