Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Support For Cam Dwindling


pantherfan81

Recommended Posts

...and I have a hard time believing that a team who plans to run a vertical offense is coveting Gabbert.

I can easily see liking Gabbert more than Newton because there are so many questions about Newton... but Gabbert's skill set would seem to be a poor fit for a team planning to run a vertical offense.

I would like to see us spend the pick on Dareus and find a vet QB to fill the gap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...and I have a hard time believing that a team who plans to run a vertical offense is coveting Gabbert.

I can easily see liking Gabbert more than Newton because there are so many questions about Newton... but Gabbert's skill set would seem to be a poor fit for a team planning to run a vertical offense.

I would like to see us spend the pick on Dareus and find a vet QB to fill the gap.

That's a good point. Hard to imagine you would want to take the guy whose weakness is the deep ball if you want a vertical offense. The stat is he only completed 30% or so of his passes over 15 yards. He has the arm just not the accuracy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a good point. Hard to imagine you would want to take the guy whose weakness is the deep ball if you want a vertical offense. The stat is he only completed 30% or so of his passes over 15 yards. He has the arm just not the accuracy

I honestly think that any interest we've shown in these QB's is a bluff meant to lure another team into a trade.

I don't think we're happy with what we've got at QB, but I doubt Hurney or Rivera thinks any of these guys are the answer... I'm fully expecting the opening day starter to be a vet that we acquire through FA or a trade, but the lockout could derail that.

Given Moore's arm strength and his experience, I wouldn't at all be shocked to see him getting the nod as the opening day starter.

Here's something else I haven't heard discussed very much: I'm assuming the Cards will probably part ways with Derek Anderson, Chud had success with Anderson when they were with the Browns, therefore... Derek Anderson may be a vet QB we target?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly think that any interest we've shown in these QB's is a bluff meant to lure another team into a trade.

I don't think we're happy with what we've got at QB, but I doubt Hurney or Rivera thinks any of these guys are the answer... I'm fully expecting the opening day starter to be a vet that we acquire through FA or a trade, but the lockout could derail that.

Given Moore's arm strength and his experience, I wouldn't at all be shocked to see him getting the nod as the opening day starter.

Here's something else I haven't heard discussed very much: I'm assuming the Cards will probably part ways with Derek Anderson, Chud had success with Anderson when they were with the Browns, therefore... Derek Anderson may be a vet QB we target?

I still think Dareus or Fairley is the way to go. And for some reason I still like Matt Moore so I wouldn't hate that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think Dareus or Fairley is the way to go. And for some reason I still like Matt Moore so I wouldn't hate that

Fairley scares me, he's talented but I'm not sure about his work ethic... I think Dareus has almost as much raw talent as Fairley and is a much safer pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get all the hate about Gabbert in a vertical passing game. Against the best competition he faced last year he completed a higher percentage of vertical passes than Ryan Mallett. Literally the only category Mallett did better than Gabbert in, completion wise, was over 30 yards, where Gabbert just didn't attempt hardly any passes (like one a game, heh). Previous year he did, though... last year they just didn't have receivers to stretch the field.

Now, Gabbert's not the best deep threat in this draft but I think it is flat out wrong to say he can't function vertically... You do not need elite arm strength to run an AC offense, you just need the ability to stretch the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly think that any interest we've shown in these QB's is a bluff meant to lure another team into a trade.

I don't think we're happy with what we've got at QB, but I doubt Hurney or Rivera thinks any of these guys are the answer... I'm fully expecting the opening day starter to be a vet that we acquire through FA or a trade, but the lockout could derail that.

Given Moore's arm strength and his experience, I wouldn't at all be shocked to see him getting the nod as the opening day starter.

Here's something else I haven't heard discussed very much: I'm assuming the Cards will probably part ways with Derek Anderson, Chud had success with Anderson when they were with the Browns, therefore... Derek Anderson may be a vet QB we target?

Pray this is the case

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We have taken two TEs in three seasons I think, and Sanders may not pan out or it may have been a sophomore slump, but we took a guy last year that was coming on.  I am not in favor of TE in round one and really don’t consider it a high priority in any round. 
    • Trevon Moehrig, Turk Wharton, Bobby Brown, Jaelen Phillips, Devin Lloyd, Nic Scourton Giving him 6 starters in 2 offseasons that cost boat loads of money or a 2nd round pick... Not exactly handing the man scraps. The point of the draft is to make the team better. You want to make this about Bryce. It isn't. It's about improving the team. And if anyone can look at our offense and go "we're good", they are lying to themselves. You give quarterbacks weapons. We SCREAMED for YEARS to give Cam some help. But now because we are trying to do it for Bryce, you all are saying we are coddling him because of his "deficiencies". It's a double-standard because you don't like the guy, clearly. But even if he does fail, guess what? The next guy has help too. Win-win.
    • we have 2 solid/above average (however you want to phrase that) wr's, which is more than half the league at least.  We dont need to be blowing more first round capital just to placate Bryce and his limitations.   We have one absolute stud (probably top 10 wr) in tmac and we have a high floor guy with insane potential if he can stay healthy.  Yeah man we are in better shape than the bulk of the teams in the league.  If you need to add some speed or whatever, sure draft in the mid rounds or wait until tc cuts.  Its monumentally stupid to spend 3 straight firsts on a wr if thats the route they go.  ITs just more and more excuses for Bryce, thats where we are at now.    "How can bryce succeed without a big possession type wr (drafts 2 for him), how is bryce supposed to exceed without a speed guy......."   Its fuging never ending.  Give EE some goddamn help on defense for once
×
×
  • Create New...