Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Derek Anderson?


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

I haven't seen this discussed much (or maybe I missed it) but given Chud's previous success with Derek Anderson and the likelihood that he will be released by the Cards, I could see DA as a vet FA QB we potentially target.

I could also see a scenario where we trade down to the Cards 5th overall pick and take Anderson as part of the deal...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't seen this discussed much (or maybe I missed it) but given Chud's previous success with Derek Anderson and the likelihood that he will be released by the Cards, I could see DA as a vet FA QB we potentially target.

I could also see a scenario where we trade down to the Cards 5th overall pick and take Anderson as part of the deal...

PLEASE no! :eek:

Carson Palmer, Kyle Orton, or bust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't seen this discussed much (or maybe I missed it) but given Chud's previous success with Derek Anderson and the likelihood that he will be released by the Cards, I could see DA as a vet FA QB we potentially target.

I could also see a scenario where we trade down to the Cards 5th overall pick and take Anderson as part of the deal...

He's not the answer, but I could see it happening. Doubt he'd ever have another year like that one but it's enough to make teams consider him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he's likely to get cut, so I wouldn't bother with the trade. I think it would make some sense as Pickles doesn't seem to fit the more vertical game that Chud wants to go with. If we don't draft a quarterback though, it will be a long season of musical quarterbacks with him, Clausen, and Moore (or some free agent).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's not the answer, but I could see it happening. Doubt he'd ever have another year like that one but it's enough to make teams consider him

Yeah, I don't think he would go to another pro-bowl but Chud might be able to get one or two more good seasons out of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do think some of Anderson's struggles may be related to trying to run an offense that was designed for Kurt Warner... I'm not making excuses for him, but this could have been part of the problem?

If anyone knows how to get DA's best, it's Chud...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do think some of Anderson's struggles may be related to trying to run an offense that was designed for Kurt Warner... I'm not making excuses for him, but this might have been part of the problem?

Eh, maybe. But to be fair, he did struggle in the exact same offense he succeeded in the year before. It might have just been a one year thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hasselbeck is the best available option atm imo

not sure, I got some friends that are Hawk fans......Charlie Whitehurst blew but many were wanting him to get a bigger shot. The guy we watched in the playoffs ain't the guy we would be getting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Brother you've been WR driven for going on almost two decades now.  No need for us to discuss further.
    • First, apologies @MHS831, I know you began this about tackles, and it was good. But... Frank, your post is just another Bryce sucks post. You obviously believe, like your buddy, that if we draft a WR it's all about evaluating Bryce Young or coddling Bryce Young. In short, it would be about improving the damned team. If anything, if Bryce is as destined to fail (or is already a failure right now... irredeemable), then another playmaker at WR would just seal the envelope and send him on his way. In my world, that's a good thing.  If some of you think that Bryce is a lame duck, then why wouldn't you want to set the offense up for the next QB to come in and be dropped into the offense to have success? Or, maybe you think it's all a moot point anyway because Tepper sucks, Dan Morgan sucks, Canales sucks, Ejiro sucks, Brandt Tilis sucks---everybidy sucks! If that's the case, then why does anyone care who or what we draft? Obviously some of you have all the answers and can run a gotdamn franchise better than the FO does now.
    • Yeah man, idk. I’m not super big on looking at the position group overall and damning the group. I’ll do the same with less words for WR. I think Proctor is the ultimate fit because he could be your future left or right tackle or left or right guard. Guys a starter, how much Zavala, Christensen, Curhan, and Corbett did we see last year again? Mauigoa will not be there when we pick, but you take him for the same reason you take Proctor minus maybe the LT. Freeling *could* be an upgrade at LT for the future. You don’t take Miller or Iheanahor because the position flexibility isn’t there, likely RT only guys. Those Utah guys are light in the ass, don’t want. Now I do WR. All extremely unproductive when compared to previous Round 1 WR. Tate- Gone Lemon- Complete player, not a burner, would take at 19 Tyson- Made of glass, Colorado washout  Cooper- Not the best hands. Like 300 of his yards were lucky ass stumble blooper looking poo. Bernard gives you similar but better in the 2nd. KC- Slaps then catches the ball. Lightning fast for about 20 yards. Good return man. poo QBs probably more to unlock. Would take at 19 if Proctor, Freeling, Lemon were gone. Washington guy- Lumbers, the smoothness Canales hyped for TMac, not there with him. We need a different style player.    
×
×
  • Create New...