Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The John Fox Mentality. Cmon


Panthro

Recommended Posts

John Fox is off drinking Coors but his mentality is alive and well in the Carolinas, (and the Huddle). His mentality of "playing it safe" worked only 3 out of the 9 years he was a coach here. 3! That's it. But for some reason we still want to play it safe and not take any chances. Some people seem ok with being 7-9 or 8-8 the majority of the time.

We have a NEW coaching staff with a NEW philosphy who want to dictate games offensively. They want teams to adjust to the Panthers. The "punt is a good play" is no longer the mentality around here.

Mind you I am not against drafting a DT a need position but Dareus = Fairley = Taylor = Austin. All are solid but not special. One can be had of equal talent later on. Cmon

PP is a good to great corner but would you draft Revis or Flacco/Ryan/Freeman if you had to choose. Cmon

AJ Green more youth at a position where we have youth. 3 picks last year at WR and we want to pick another? Cmon.

Let us remember that we all want the same thing. A Super Bowl Championship. We've played it safe for long enough without winning... time to try it another way. Cmon

Same thing can be said about taking a QB. Just throwing that out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

#1 or #18 they still gambled and took a QB in the first.it just so happens that we have the first pick so if you are high on a prospect you take him. According to Rahiem Morris if they had the 1st pick they would have taken Freeman.

Some people are tired of having a game manger and actually want a QB who can win a game by himself.

You really don't understand the cap do you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And if he doesn't are you going to pay for my PSLs?
When you get a refund for last year I'll talk to you about paying for your PSL's if Cam doesn't pan out.

lol so 2-14 is ok in ncbobcats book but taking a chance on a franchise QB is out of the question. :banghead:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bust franchise QBs sets franchises back many years, bust lineman or skill players outside of QB sets back teams only a couple.

I pay for PSLs and I want a winning product. If that means going safe, so be it. I don't want to see a losing product while a rookie QB, especially a raw one like Cam, tries to find his way.

I am also a PSL owner and want a winning product. Unlike you I will be pissed if the Panthers pass AGAIN on another QB in the 1st round for a position player, and that kid goes on to be great for another team while the Panthers are perenial celler dwellers in the NFC South.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point, how many of those guys were drafted #1 overall? Manning. How many Superbowls does he have? One. It's less of a risk, capwise, to take a QB outside of the top 10. If you have to part ways because of a bust pick, it won't hurt the franchise nearly as bad. The Cam nuthuggers want him #1 overall and given how raw and developmental of a project he is, it's a huge risk monetarily and to the team's prosperity if he doesn't pan out.

And how many 10+ winning seasons in a row and playoff appearances does Manning have??????? I will take what Manning has done and his one Superbowl win ANY DAY of the week. I am not saying Cam is Manning but come on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you get a refund for last year I'll talk to you about paying for your PSL's if Cam doesn't pan out.

lol so 2-14 is ok in ncbobcats book but taking a chance on a franchise QB is out of the question. :banghead:

No 2-14 isn't okay, but Cam is anything but a given as a franchise QB. Just becasuse you wish it so does not make it so. If we draft Cam and he pans out...great!!! I just don't see it happening. Meanwhile we tread the waters of mediocracy or wrose in the process.

Also you know people don't get refunds on poor products and you not having to pay for PSLs is exactly why the risk is worth it for you. You have ZERO stake in the team. It's monopoly money to you. All you have is team pride on the line which no different than the rest of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...