Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A more thoughtful take on Moon, Cam, and Race


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Unlike a somewhat ludicrous and disingenuous "racism test", Dan Wetzel's piece is a more intelligent, enlightened, respectful, and racially sensitive way to come at this whole situation

His column makes it more about Cam (where it should be).

Race is a sensitive and complicated matter to discuss, especially on a national scale through the instant-feedback modern media. A 21-year-old QB trying to show teams he can move past numerous off-field dramas doesn’t appear to be the ideal vehicle.

Which is why I scoff at the way this issue has been handled on this forum from the very start.

While honest discussions of race should be welcomed in society, getting Cam Newton drafted isn’t about society – it’s about business. Navigating the waters of the pre-draft process, where millions of dollars are literally at stake, requires a plan. That’s one reason Moon was brought in. He seemed like a perfect adviser for Newton.

Instead he put his guy in the middle of the fire. Debating racial bias is a delicate task; the third-rail of America. Why make Newton have to answer questions about it, where one misspoke word can stick with him forever?

Yeah, Moon is probably off base in this regard, and probably should have left this race debate out of it all together (just like I was hoping that smarter minds would not have egged it on in this forum).

Nawrocki, who denies race was a factor in his evaluation of Newton, may or may not have been too tough on Newton.

Which is what some of us were trying to focus on, but others want to take the race card and run with it.

Then there is this: Moon’s opinion is too easy for critics to dismiss. Moon may indeed be right about race factoring in certain critiques of Newton. The problem is quarterbacks of all color tend to get treated unfairly.

How true.

But, in Moon's defense, he did say, "I don’t see other quarterbacks in the draft being criticized by the media or fans about their smile or called a phony." And I believe this is really what set Moon off. And, this is what really should be the crux of the racial debate (IMHO). Comparing only the real football related stuff in regards to racism is really not the point, it's the phony smile stuff, etc. that's arguably the problem. Now, Mallet, and our very own Clausen may be better comparisons in this regard. I don't know about Mallet (because I really haven't made him my business), but I do believe that Pickles was treated unfairly as a kid coming out of college. So, comparing Cam to Clausen (and Mallet, from what I have gleaned) in regards to whether or not some of Cam's critics are racially motivated, is a little more intellectually honest than comparing a bunch of arbitrary statements within draft evaluations. But, even still, you can't completely discount what Moon is saying.

With Newton, Moon sees race as a factor. Others certainly won’t. There will be a backlash.

And, this is the unfortunate part. We're focusing more about other issues than just about Cam Newton's ability to play QB for this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not about Race at all. It is pathetic for anyone to pull the race card in 2011. Some don't want to believe it, but maybe....just maybe a 'minority' just isn't the right person for the job.

GASP!!!!

Yeah sorry but true. Anyone pulling the race card is doing so because they are racist and or they got nothing else.

Oh and Cam's smile? the first time I saw it change to the bull poo smile he has right now is when he went on the field pre game against Alabama maybe? Right after the NCAA declared he could play and wouldn't be suspended for his part in what his dad did. Right then and there I saw the 'I can't believe I got away with this poo' smile he has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I'm picking teams for a game of pickup basketball... and I know nothing about the people i'm picking... I'd pick the black guy over the white guy.

Does that mean i'm racist?

I just want to win...

No, it's just being real. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I'm picking teams for a game of pickup basketball... and I know nothing about the people i'm picking... I'd pick the black guy over the white guy.

Does that mean i'm racist?

I just want to win...

I couldn't help but laugh at this. Lol, this was too funny. You pick me in a game of basketball if you want. You ain't winning a damn thing with me on your team... I can't hoop @all.

Top Dawg I really dig you. I just read another thread this morning and I must say that you are a lot better than me. I couldn't be going back and forth with a goddamn fool all day like you did yesterday. My mom always said don't argue with fools. But you are one of several people on here that I respect. Big props to you....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are some truly insensitive sh#t on this board sometimes. I don't necessarily believe Cam was unfairly treated bc of his race. But the way some of you react is saddening. I think people on this board's desire to attack Cam Newton or probably more likely the Newton Huggers has clouded some of you guy's judgment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, it's just being real. LOL

That's racial prejudiced. If you consider this, 5 guys who robbed the store. I'd pick the black one, is that racist? No, it's prejudice. Maybe 'racial prejudice? It's a negative connotation so it's deemed racist by people who just spew racist in the event of anything but the truth is connotation can be positive as well as negative and still be prejudiced, because it is already assuming a prejudice about someone, a certain race. Does negative connotation equate to hate? Not necessarily just like a positive on does not equate to love. The definition of racism is to hate another race, I don't think that qualifies.

My team would kick your ass though because I'd chose all the Mexican/Spanish kids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I'm picking teams for a game of pickup basketball... and I know nothing about the people i'm picking... I'd pick the black guy over the white guy.

Does that mean i'm racist?

I just want to win...

I'm white. If you chose the black guys over me in hoops you would have lost. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are some truly insensitive sh#t on this board sometimes. I don't necessarily believe Cam was unfairly treated bc of his race. But the way some of you react is saddening. I think people on this board's desire to attack Cam Newton or probably more likely the Newton Huggers has clouded some of you guy's judgment.

No doubt about it... I just noticed that this dude "smash-and-dashgash" called me a *** in my control panel because I am a Newton fan. That speaks volumes to the type of people on this site. I know that there are some sorry ass mofos on here that have too much time on their hands. Any mofo who starts a fugin race quiz thread need to get a fugin life. That type of shii has no place on this or any other sports forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I couldn't help but laugh at this. Lol, this was too funny. You pick me in a game of basketball if you want. You ain't winning a damn thing with me on your team... I can't hoop @all.

Top Dawg I really dig you. I just read another thread this morning and I must say that you are a lot better than me. I couldn't be going back and forth with a goddamn fool all day like you did yesterday. My mom always said don't argue with fools. But you are one of several people on here that I respect. Big props to you....

Thanks, TJ. I wouldn't necessarily call the man a fool. At worst, I believe that the "goddamn fool" that you refer to (LOL) is just ignorant, and at best, racially insensitive. But, you know, my main problem with the whole thing is that as opposed to respecting what I was getting at, he continued farther down the path, completely disregarding my feelings on the matter. When it comes to race, it's a very difficult subject to discuss, but being that it has been a calling of mine for years (in one form or another), I always try to discuss it from a good place, and with a good heart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...