Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gus Malzahn blasts Nawrocki (PFW)'s account of Newton


blackcatgrowl

Recommended Posts

Pretty similar to my take, despite how it gets characterized.

I'm not half as opposed to the pick as people think, but with this crowd, if you're not 100% on board with him, you get proclaimed as hater, racist or whatever :rolleyes:

I don't want any quarterback, it isn't just Newton, but if we pick him then I'll hope they were right.

I also don't think the "signs" are as clear as some think they are, but that has to do with reading how teams speak prior to a draft. It has nothing to do with "hate".

It's amazing just how stupid some of the stuff has gotten here.

Seriously. Like this one guy created a racism quiz and...........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty similar to my take, despite how it gets characterized.

If you're not 100% on board with him, you get proclaimed as hater, racist or whatever :rolleyes:

Dude.... don't even try it...

Do you see Zod posting new threads linking crap articles bashing Newton without any sort of basis?

Does Zod post in EVERY Newton thread at some point talking crap about him in subtle tones?

You ARE NOT ok with us taking Newton. You've said in probably hundreds of posts "We don't need to take any QBs in this draft" (which I personally think is a mask for saying you don't want Newton). You've talked about how Gabbert would be ok PROVIDED xyz happens.

Is a little honesty too much to ask?

I'll freely admit, I'm on the Newton bandwagon. I have been since the DAY Luck said he was staying in school.

Why?

Because the he DOES have unique talent.

And...

Because the Carolina Panthers NEED a franchise QB NOW, not in a year, but NOW.

We either take a chance on Newton or we just continue to suck ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty similar to my take, despite how it gets characterized.

If you're not 100% on board with him, you get proclaimed as hater, racist or whatever :rolleyes:

No, you get proclaimed a hater when you continually diminish his accomplishments by comparing him to JaMarcus Russell and David Carr. I'm sorry but if you personally failed as a professional athlete or you didn't win any sort of college championship then shut the hell up. You can't take away from someone's accomplishments if you didn't even do anything successful yourself. The fact that so many people are arguing over Newton should convey in it's own right that he is a talent and indeed a one of a kind athlete. However, when someone uses personal threats and attacks a guy he hasn't even met through second hand information that may or may not be eschued is flat out shallow and disrespectful. You don't have to be 100% on board with him but you also don't have to make him look like the anti-christ I mean seriously he is getting as much hate as Michael Vick received. I haven't seen any negative comments about the other guys in the draft. Yes, I have seen critiques, but I am pretty sure Patrick Peterson, Marcell Dareus, and A.J. Green have not been called fake. I mean hell, Patrick Peterson was lifted up and darn near proclaimed a god after it was indicated a "pay for play" deal might have been in place at LSU. However, God forbid Cam Newton to do something like this and people are calling to crucify him. Everyone always wants to bash Cam Newton because apparently he is a proud son of a b*tch, but if I am not mistaken he plays the game exactly like the Carolina Panthers own Steve Smith; with a fire and passion that is untouchable. If you really want to argue for or against something about Newton at least make sure it is factual or at least somewhat true like... "he has trouble with his footwork at times." I mean really? no really? really? whatever. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You ARE NOT ok with us taking Newton. You've said in probably hundreds of posts "We don't need to take any QBs in this draft" (which I personally think is a mask for saying you don't want Newton). You've talked about how Gabbert would be ok PROVIDED xyz happens.

pretty big difference between being okay with a guy ending up drafted at #1 and wanting to draft a particular guy at #1

one implies that if it happens, you would be fine with it and the support the guy. the other is that you want that guy in particular.

I'd be okay with Newton. Would prefer others, but hey, the guys making these decisions know far more than me so I'd get right behind him and root for him the second he was a Panther.

Does that mean I want to draft him #1 if I was in charge of the decision, based on what I have available to me now? No.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for illustrating my point, guys :rolleyes:

FYI: The whole "if we don't draft a quarterback this year, we'll never be good" argument is stupid.

By the same token, the "if we sign Billy Volek, we will be fine" argument is even stupider.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for illustrating my point, guys :rolleyes:

FYI: The whole "if we don't draft a quarterback this year, we'll never be good" argument is stupid.

I am pretty sure that is false. We had two times the talent St. Louis did, yet they added Sam Bradford and were one win away from making the playoff's. Try again........................................:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That doesn't promise us Andrew Luck, you realize that right?

Never said it did.

But do I think it gives us better options in the draft than are available this year? Yes I do.

:rofl:

To Mr. Scot, not sucking ass is going 8-8 and missing the playoffs for a few years.

See his reply above.... LOL

But if we draft Newton, were in the playoffs this season and every season after, right? :rolleyes:

Some of you guys should look back at 2002 and 2003.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But if we draft Newton, were in the playoffs this season and every season after, right? :rolleyes:

Some of you guys should look back at 2002 and 2003.

Ahh... yes... now we get to deal in absolutes.

NOTHING is guaranteed by drafting ANY player, even your precious Andrew Luck.

HOWEVER, drafting Newton has a GREATER POSSIBILITY of making playoffs in 2 years or less than bringing a "stop gap" Volek or some other bench warming tool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never said it did.

But do I think it gives us better options in the draft than are available this year? Yes I do.

But if we draft Newton, were in the playoffs this season and every season after, right? :rolleyes:

Some of you guys should look back at 2002 and 2003.

The only QB better than Newton in next years class would be Luck and possibly Weeden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right...I think they've done really well. No one's going to bat 1000% but they've addressed areas of need and there's no comparison to the overall talent of the team now than when DC and then Morgan got the reigns. This whole season is about seeing how much of a step up can Bryce and this team make. If Bryce can't and last year is as good as it gets for him then at least we have a talented roster for the next guy. I think we're going to be good this season 
    • I said could, not would. I recognize he has potential based on past performance. Compared to what KP has done, Howell has more potential and the physical traits to make noise. KP has small hands and a weak arm. Not something you want in even your backup QB.  I've been hammering since last off-season before we re-signed Dalton, improve the room. Other than getting younger, I don't see how anyone can say we legitimately improved the room or even tried. We might as well have signed Josh Rosen.  Dalton is still on the roster for now. That's 3 QBs unless we trade or cut him. He's still Bryce's mentor after all. Do you believe we are going to draft someone with potential and give them a legitimate opportunity to develop from the practice squad? Are we going to carry 3 QBs on the active roster? 4 for a developmental rookie? Are we going to potentially cut KP if we draft a rookie and he's outperformed? Doubtful. Cutting Dalton(if we can't trade him) and KP would be 8m in wasted cap space.  I chose Howell as an example because he showed promise in his only full season as a starter. You could plug in another name with the physical traits and potential and what i said would still apply. KP showed almost nothing and was benched. I genuinely don't care if it’s rookie pick as long as there is the potential to develop into a future NFL QB.  As much as I can't stand him, Bellichek was always developing a number 2 QB even with the GOAT as his starter. The wisdom of that was evident when Cassell came in when Brady was hurt week 1 and went 11-5 and almost made the wildcard, which 11-5 gets you almost any other year. I give credit where it's due though. Cassel and Jimmy G both came into the league as developmental QBs, potential QB1s, and went on to have careers.  You never know if you never try. KP feels like a punt in addressing the most important position on the field. Bryce has never played 2 full games of franchise QB level football back to back.  If Bryce progresses, are you ready to offer a 280m 5 year extension based off a one hit wonder year? If Bryce regresses and we need a QB in 27, are we going to trade a fortune away again to trade up to 1 to get one? Are you ready to do the past 3 years all over again?  To me, it's not about Kenny Pickett. It's about the move itself. It was a feeble attempt to improve the QB room. We better hope Bryce succeeds, because if he doesn't, we literally have no backup plan right now.   
    • IOL that early isn’t good value at all. We have a LT who might not ever be good again and a RT that might retire soon. T seems deep early in this draft, so I’d go there in the 1st. 
×
×
  • Create New...