Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

John Fox in perspective: How do you judge?


top dawg

Recommended Posts

As with Jake Delhomme, Coach John Fox has lost favor with a portion of Carolina's fan base. Are we being too critical? Or, should we wander through our own form of desert for 40 years until Fox delivers us to the promised land? Has he earned that much with a respectable .563 winning percentage, a trip to 3 postseasons and a Super Bowl? I am just asking the question, I don't know if I'd dump Fox or not, particularly after a 12-4 season, but I am a little restless and critical after viewing some of his work over the past 3 seasons.

Like I referenced in another discussion, Fox has looked just downright confused at times which has been reflected onto the field. I don't know whether it's the play on the field that causes the seeming bewilderment on the sidelines, or vice versa. Perhaps its a domino, pinball or snowball effect in reference to the confusion. I don't know. But, the utter annihilation at the hands of the Cards is more than just a red flag, it may be a red stop sign.

In a period where Mike Shanahan and Jon Gruden were let go, and after viewing the misfortune of Marty Schottenheimer with his conservative "Marty ball", you can't help but ask yourself if Fox should be kicked to the curb also. But, like I alluded to before, he has had a modicum of success, especially when looking at the current crop of coaches.

Here is some information for you to base your assessment.

Some are a little dated, but still offers some insight.

From a CBS sports forum:

* Vince Lombardi: 96 wins, .738 winning percentage, 2 Super Bowl wins, 5 NFL championships, 9-1 postseason record.

* Don Shula: 328 wins, .678 winning percentage, 2 Super Bowl wins, 1 NFL championship, 19-17 post season record.

* Tom Landry: 250 wins, .607 winning persentage, 2 Super Bowl wins, 20 consecutive winning seasons (NFL record), 20-16 post season record.

* Chuck Noll: 186 wins, .572 winnnining percentage, 4 Super Bowl wins, 16-8 post season record.

* George Halas: 318 wins, .682 winning percentage, 6 NFL championships, 6-4 postseason record.

* Bill Walsh: 92 wins, .609 winning percentage, 3 Super Bowl wins, 10-4 post season record.

* Bill Belichick: 138 wins, .623 winning percentage, 3 Super Bowl wins, 15-4 post season record.

EA Sports Top 25

ColdHardFootballFacts.com

wikianswers.com

Current Coaches

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOOOOK--

John Fox's problem is right the opposite of Jake.

With Jake, everything is in your face this is what I did, or I screwed up, blah,blah,blah....

Fox is straight up communist. We really don't know poo about Fox other than he is conservative. He is very 1 dimensional to the public, and thats what is pissing folks off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see no reason to boot him, especially after a 12-4 season. If he goes right back to his ways of ultra-conservatism while hovering over his D-coordinator along with a junky record next season....then sure, it might be time for change. But he deserves at least one more season.

Let's not forget that he helped join a big core of the team. Fox and his staff have done quite well in the draft in the past years. Look at some of the guys they've come across: Jordan Gross, Chris Gamble, Travelle Wharton, Thomas Davis, Geoff Hangartner, DeAngelo Williams, Richard Marshall, Jon Beason, Ryan Kalil, Jonathan Stewart, Jeff Otah, etc. These are only a few of our starters since 2003 via the draft. Is it all Fox's success? No. But he's built a solid team with solid personnel. Our team is almost year in and year out a threatening team (look at the debacle of teams like the Browns, Lions, 49ers, Raiders, etc since 2002ish.)

I will admit that I'm not as big of a fan of Fox as I was up until 2006 or so, but I think he's a good coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're going to judge, then why not judge by the best?

Yeah, an old '73 pinto will get you from point A to point B, but I am not going to mistake it for a Ford GT which will get me to point B a whole lot faster.

If you want titles, you have to look at the guys who have them, If you want victories, you have to do the same. Post season victories, etc., etc. Victories and Super Bowls are the best case scenario. In any event, there are more recent coaches by which to make a comparison...Gruden and Shanahan, Cowher, Reid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at that list though.... Shula was a bad ass Mo Fo.

30+ post season games ..... WOW

better stat he won it all 3 times and lost 17 times in the post season.

Tom Landry won just 2 times and lot 16 times

of course with that said

2* Chuck Noll: 186 wins, .572 winnnining percentage, 4 Super Bowl wins, 16-8 post season record.

5* George Halas: 318 wins, .682 winning percentage, 6 NFL championships, 6-4 postseason record.

4* Bill Walsh: 92 wins, .609 winning percentage, 3 Super Bowl wins, 10-4 post season record.

3* Bill Belichick: 138 wins, .623 winning percentage, 3 Super Bowl wins, 15-4 post season record.

1* Vince Lombardi: 96 wins, .738 winning percentage, 2 Super Bowl wins, 5 NFL championships, 9-1 postseason record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As with Jake Delhomme, Coach John Fox has lost favor with a portion of Carolina's fan base. Are we being too critical? Or, should we wander through our own form of desert for 40 years until Fox delivers us to the promised land? Has he earned that much with a respectable .563 winning percentage, a trip to 3 postseasons and a Super Bowl? I am just asking the question, I don't know if I'd dump Fox or not, particularly after a 12-4 season, but I am a little restless and critical after viewing some of his work over the past 3 seasons.

Like I referenced in another discussion, Fox has looked just downright confused at times which has been reflected onto the field. I don't know whether it's the field on the play that causes the seeming bewilderment on the sidelines, or vice versa. Perhaps its a domino, pinball or snowball effect in reference to the confusion. I don't know. But, the utter annihilation at the hands of the Cards is more than just a red flag, it may be a red stop sign.

In a period where Mike Shanahan and Jon Gruden were let go, and after viewing the misfortune of Marty Schottenheimer with his conservative "Marty ball", you can't help but ask yourself if Fox should be kicked to the curb also. But, like I alluded to before, he has had a modicum of success, especially when looking at the current crop of coaches.

WHA?! criticism of Foxy? Criticism of any kind on this forum? GET HIM!!!!!!!!

attachment.php?attachmentid=28700&stc=1&d=1234854335

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at that list though.... Shula was a bad ass Mo Fo.

30+ post season games ..... WOW

He was, but for a fair space of time Marv Levy practically owned him.

My jury is still out on Fox, honestly. Overall positive, but definite issues.

This coming season will be an important one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...