Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How will an uncapped year affect the Panthers


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

what do you think? The panthers are one of only 4 organizations in the NFL to never experience an uncapped year.

could it hurt business? Is it better for us to not experience having to meet a certain figure in total salaries? Do you think contracts will get out of control between no limit and players' expectations of how much more they can get paid because there are no restrictions?

How do you think Hurney and his clan will handle signings? Not necessarily big-time deals but the smaller ones?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It shouldn't effect us too much if the uncapped year hits. we are 11th in organizational worth in the league. SO we can compete with the other clubs for sure.

There ya go.

While we don't have the cash Dallas/Washington would have, we would stay in the top ten of talent most likely, thank our PSL owners for that when you see them.:eek6:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only time we'll have an uncapped year is in year 2010 (IIRC) when the owners and players union haven't agreed on new terms. My point is, from what I remember, new terms would be agreed on. Of course, anything could happen. But the main goal was to get rid of the old plan of action due to rookie contracts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a lot of things that will actually limit what teams spend so it won't be the free for all that baseball enjoys. For example players won't be free agent after 4 years without the CBA, it will be six years. Plus we can franchise 3 players rather than the current 1. Plus teams with the 8 highest team salaries will have restrictions on new spending. It is all outlined in this article.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d808736ba&template=with-video&confirm=true

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a lot of things that will actually limit what teams spend so it won't be the free for all that baseball enjoys. For example players won't be free agent after 4 years without the CBA, it will be six years. Plus we can franchise 3 players rather than the current 1. Plus teams with the 8 highest team salaries will have restrictions on new spending. It is all outlined in this article.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d808736ba&template=with-video&confirm=true

That should even the odds a little, year by year. (then again, signing a ton of FAs doesn't necessarily mean you're going to do better the year after)

The rule will restrict the final eight teams in the playoffs from signing free agents. The final four teams shall not be permitted to negotiate and sign any unrestricted free agent to a player contract except for players who acquired their status by being cut or were on the final four team when their contract expired. Playoff teams five thru eight get a break to sign one player with a salary of $4,925,000 or more and any number of players with a first-year salary of no more than $3,275,000 and an annual increase of no more than 30 percent in the following years.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bruce Arians said when evaluating a college prospect they have to win on 3rd down and in the 2 min drill to be successful in the nfl.
    • We took Luke when we had Jon Beason, and a hurt Jonathon Brooks when we had Chuba. Just noting.  I don't think teams are going to pass up on an impact player regardlessly if whether they need something else. There's a good argument that drafting an inferior player, and especially an obviously inferior player, based upon need is a pathway to failure.  I'm glad we took Tetairoa McMillan even though there were arguably bigger needs.
    • As much as I'd love Cam or Mahomes I'd also settle for a QB that is at least better than average at something other than 4th quarter comebacks/game winning drives. He's literally bottom third in the league in most categories (yards, completion percentage, int percentage/turnovers, YPA, IAYPA, QBR and QB rating) and right around average in a couple others, notably TD % where he is 15th and YAC/PA where he is 9th. If Bryce can improve I'll be happy with him. But all this stuff about us asking for perfection / insane ability is a bit ridiculous. Most of us "haters" just see a QB that is basically below average over his career to date and has shown relatively little consistency in his third year.  NFL offenses don't need 400 yards every week at all, but they do require a QB that can move the ball, and Bryce struggles often with that (hence why our overall offensive rank is so bad despite an overall good rushing rank).
×
×
  • Create New...