Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A draft day trade is imminent,the Beathard-Hurney effect

thecarolinaswagger

By thecarolinaswagger,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

thecarolinaswagger Newbie

thecarolinaswagger

Posted
Posted

everybody knows that martey hurney is a bobby beathard protege,and everybody knows that hurney has made some type of draft day trade every year he has been here. most of the trades have been giving up future picks in exchange to move up into a particular round,or to get additional particular round picks. that is the bobby beathard way and it won him a few superbowls a long the way,but he also picked ryan leaf over manning.hurney has continued to go into each draft with the bobby beathard mentality,and this year will be no different. it will not surprise me one bit to see the panthers trade for another first round pick this year and give up future picks. look at what beathard did at one point in his career.

http://www.sptimes.com/News/050400/Sports/Don_t_judge_Beathard_.shtml

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bj-Monster23 Newbie

Bj-Monster23

Posted
Posted

I Think that there is about 3 to 4 teams that will be willing to trade up to the number 1 overall pick. And i believe those teams are the Arizona Cardinals, Washington Redskins, Cincinnati Bengals and the Minnesota Vikings. But I will put my Money on Arizona and Cincinnati...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaNut Explorer

CarolinaNut

Posted
Posted

I Think that there is about 3 to 4 teams that will be willing to trade up to the number 1 overall pick. And i believe those teams are the Arizona Cardinals, Washington Redskins, Cincinnati Bengals and the Minnesota Vikings. But I will put my Money on Arizona and Cincinnati...

the only realistic 2 from those teams are arizona and cincy...minnesota is too far back and washington doesn't have the ammo to move up

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lumps Newbie

Lumps

Posted
Posted

Clausen may very well be dealt to a team this year if the CBA is hammered out before the draft.

If that happens someone needs to be fired. A second round pick who had zero investment completely wasted. I disagree with that though because our FO isn't that worthless, hopefully.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted

If that happens someone needs to be fired. A second round pick who had zero investment completely wasted. I disagree with that though because our FO isn't that worthless, hopefully.

You would in your backwards thinking. Last time I checked trading a player was not a wast.

Wait a minute!

was a new CBA agreed upon?

LOL I wish, but the likelihood of it happening before the draft is slim to none.

I was just throwing it out there so if it happens I can come back later and brag.:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • BIGH2001
      DJ Moore trade talk

      By BIGH2001 · Posted

      He’s kind of overrated to be honest. Never really felt like a true #1 or elevated his play to become a guy the defense really has to worry about. 
    • fieryprophet
      Hey You, You Don't Know Quarterbacking

      By fieryprophet · Posted

      I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • CRA
      Where do you fall on the Bryce Young spectrum?

      By CRA · Posted

      there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
×
×
  • Create New...