Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chud's Bible (Playbook)


Recommended Posts

this is silly, because the essence of Coryell is that it's more adaptable - formations, routes, adjustments, shifts, motions, protections - than any. It's true that a playbook can be huge, and that the Coryell guys can often go into a game with 200 plays on their sushi menu/playsheet, but a basic knowledge of the offense keeps you from having to memorize 200/900 plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this where the Wonderlic might have a bigger impact?

I doubt it honestly. I think the wonderlic speaks more to a persons ability to think quickly. It is important IMO but in a different way. Learning a playbook is a different form of intelligence.

For example; I am very good with IQ tests but I struggle with memorizing foreign languages. I know other people who are exactly the opposite.

Memorization for me is more about grueling repetition and practice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its probably just variations and sets of very similar plays.

Its probably 50 or 60, at most 100 plays, ran out of different formations and different motions. And each page probably represents these plays. Also, it is probably different plays playing to different QB's strengths. IE. If we drafted Newton, as opposed to a Mallet type.

And it take ANY QB several year to fully grasp ANY playbook.

I wouldn't look too much into it.

That is way too logical. What are you doing messing up this thread? We are discussing how smart Chud is for having 900 separate plays in a book this:

lg_huge_book_girl.jpg

...big.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As said before 900 is not all that uncommon. I dont think him or any OC would expect a QB to grasp the whole playbook in 3 months. Not even Manning could do that. Why do you think people say it takes 3 years for most OCs to install there system with a team.

exactly.. people who think the exceptions make the rule that a QB should start his 1st year are crazy.

makes no sense...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it goes into a little more detail.

*As it is looking more and more likely that Cam Newton will be a Carolina Panther, we should consider that there likely would be better landing spots for Cam. New Panthers offensive coordinator Rob Chudzinski’s playbook is believed to be somewhere in the vicinity of 900 pages, which makes it one of the most voluminous in the league. Virtually every play has a shift and/or motion. It’s a difficult offense for an experienced quarterback. Newton is inexperienced even among incoming rookies, and he the offense he was exposed to at Auburn is nothing like this one. If Cam goes to the Panthers, Chud might have to do some serious dumbing down of the offense in 2010.

http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/NFP-Sunday-Blitz-9962.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those saying that 900 page playbooks are common, the largest I have found that has been documented is 800 pages.

It happens, WCO have done it and its common in the Coryell system. TBH its more the Mike Martz approach than the Norv Turner one.

As close guarded as playbooks are I doubt this rumor is true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DA does in fact suck. But he was good for 1 year running Chud's playbook.

The comment was directed at the suggestion that a QB without a high Wonderlic would have difficulty running the system.

Ah, I see. I don't think you have to have an impressive Wonderlic score but more the desire and will to learn. (Of course, you do need some knowledge.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't necessarily think he will be moved, I would currently be leaning against that notion. I think a lot will depend on the coaching situation. Carroll certainly can't be thinking about wanting to go through a serious strip down and overhaul, so the longer he plans to remain, the less likely I think Crosby gets moved.
    • I think everyone says Mike Evans because of size, but really they have different strengths and play styles.  Tmac is better on intermediate routes and not nearly as good at contested catches. 
    • At this point, it is criminal to go into the 2026 training camp/OTA's with XL penciled in as a #2 WR. The team must upgrade, either through free agency or the draft. If he cannot give 100% effort on significantly less snaps as a #4-6 WR(players like Tremayne have done that consistently) then I don't think you have a player worth rostering beyond the trade deadline. Offensively, we eventually have to upgrade to an NFL starting caliber C. It's been almost the length of time from Gross to Ikey since Kalil retired and we have below average to terrible C play. Love Mays as a BC-esque utility backup but he will never be an above average long term starting C.  The TE room is one of the worst in the NFL but it's a low usage position in this offense, so the investments are likely to be small, if any. I would never expect to see an elite TE in a Dave Canales offense. 100% agree on OL depth. We actually aren't bad there but BC will be gone, Mays is a UFA, Corbett is a UFA and Zavala has been both injured and bad. We have to bolster that depth again or resign guys like Mays and Corbett to keep that depth somewhat stable.
×
×
  • Create New...