Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Saga continues, The NFL has appealed Judge Nelson's ruiling


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

This is going to be a major cluster fug. All over maybe $500 million either way.

Now that both sides have let emotions cloud their judgement, they are probably going to have to settle it in court or under some kind of mandated mediation.

I just can't see either side extending an olive branch to get them back to the table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

espn legal anaylst thinks that the wording on nelson's ruling is so strong that the appeals court are going to have a hard time delaying the injunction.

I saw that as well.

This could be over for the time being.

That said, never underestimate the connections a group of 32 Billion/Multimillionares have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

espn legal anaylst thinks that the wording on nelson's ruling is so strong that the appeals court are going to have a hard time delaying the injunction.

Good...and BTW, if you really think that she just made her decision today and typed up all 89 pages you're :sifone:

This decision was made weeks ago. This woman is a damn Judge... I can guarantee that her wording really is that tight. Her career and reputation is on the line. The NFL has lost already! The only way out for them is to "PAY OFF" the eighth circuit... yeah, I said it... That' the only way they can get out of this Catastrophe that was self imposed!

Only problem there is... Those guys want Football too... I guess we'll see if everybody really has their price. Because these guys certainly have the pockets!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you absolutely amaze me. But also the reason that I blame the fans as much as I blame the players for this situation. (The owners don't get off entirely either since it was their own fault for agreeing to the previous deal in the first place.)

This ruling wasn't surprising to me but I was hoping for the best and it didn't happen. Basicly at this point there are only two possible outcomes to the situation now.

1) The NFL will work out a deal through litigation that will eventually be the basis for a new CBA. This CBA will still allow for a college draft but the salary cap, tags, restrictions ect will all be gone as well as all profit sharing among owners. In order for the owners to keep the draft they will probably have to give the players a vet minimum. Eventually the smaller market and/or smaller revenue teams will have to relocate or the league will have to retract.

2) The end result of option 2 could happen either by way of the players or by way of the owners. And that is no more CBA, no more draft, no restrictions ect. The owners could decide just to do this to by pass any court rulings. Or the players could achieve this outcome via a court ruling forcing this outcome.

I really don't see any other outcomes. The owners will not go back to the previous CBA and the players are not willing to do a deal worse than the previous CBA. A true and free open market is the only outcome where both sides can feel like they come out winners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...