Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Top 100 Quarterbacks in NFL


Recommended Posts

Any moron who says Pickles has a "big arm" is a moron I'm not taking seriously...

But seriously....you really should edit that poo...Jimmy doesn't have anything close to a "big arm"....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty lousy list. How in the Hell do you rate journeymen backups over a QB that has taken their team to the Super Bowl. While Jake is in the twilight of his career he is still better than the journeymen backups you have listed. I stopped reading after that garbage.

Well, I am talking about "right now" and what journeymen did I have above Jake? Because there are none rated above Jake. But you can rant like an idiot if you please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any moron who says Pickles has a "big arm" is a moron I'm not taking seriously...

But seriously....you really should edit that poo...Jimmy doesn't have anything close to a "big arm"....

Hmmm...I don't know how that slipped out lol. I guess when you're staying up to 12 to get an article out, you'll make some blunders. Nothing that can't be fixed though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I am talking about "right now" and what journeymen did I have above Jake? Because there are none rated above Jake. But you can rant like an idiot if you please.

Senaca Wallace couldn't even beat out Jake for the starting job and is #2 behind Colt McCoy

Travis Jackson has not been #1 for a full season and will Be #2 Behind Christian Ponder.

Byron Leftwich hasn't been a full time starter since 2005

Chad Pennington has spent more time on the bench then behind the center. Has great tools but don't do much good hold a Fugging clipboard.

Shaun Hill.....hahahahahahahahahahahaha Been with 3 teams in 5 yrs... Pretty much defines JOURNEYMAN

Troy Smith... 2 teams 4 seasons....#3 Behind Smith and The rookie. If he plays again it won't be in SF.

Now onto the rest of your idiotic list.

Kyle Orton, Jason Campbell and Vince Young AHEAD of Mark Sanchez...WTF

I hate Sanchez but would start him 99 times out of a 100 over KO, JC and VY.

It is funny at least 2 of your top 20 could be out of football and at minimum 3 of them will be without a starting Job. Orton, Garrard and McNabb. (OK Maybe McNabb start but only until a rookie comes online)

Alot of damn work into an article that says NOTHING intelligent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...