Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What do they really want out of this?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

I've asked the question of whether fans would prefer that we get a lesser offer for Peppers just to get rid of him or hold out for the best offer and keep him if we don't get it. Most common answer on that front seemed to be that folks would take a lesser offer just to see him gone. Don't know that I agree with it, but that seems to be the fan sentiment.

Let me turn the question around though.

Do you think that the strategy the front office is currently employing is designed to get the absolute best offer for him or are they deliberately setting the value too high so that no one will make an offer and he'll eventually have to stay on?

When answering, I wouldn't automatically assume it's the first option. Consider carefully the statements you've read from the team and the actions they've taken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it all depends on that huge cap number. In that it depends on what we will have to do to get under the cap and who we will have to cut. Once we do this I would have to see what kind of money we will have to sign FA's. If it keeps us from signing the FA we want then I say take the lower offer. If it doesn't hold out for the offer we want. If I had to decide now I would probably take the best offer now instead of dragging it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

peppers is gone next season. Why did we trade away kris jenkins again? oh ya he didnt want to be here anymore and some thought he was becoming a cancer.. well jenkins never went as far as peppers has in voicing his desire to leave. Bottom line is Peppers gets traded somewhere, and my guess will be to the highest bidder even if it is an nfc team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panthers offered to make Peppers the highest paid defensive player in the league based on his current body of work. You could argue that means the team thinks a lot more of his abilities than we fans do.

Is a public tantrum (or two) enough to change those feelings?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The FO is playing poker right now, and they hold all the cards. I think that Peppers will be gone no later than the draft. He pretty much has to because that cap hit is just too damn big. Hell we could sign Haynesworth and 2 or 3 mid tier free agents just for what he is making.....its kinda ridiculous

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So do they. The question is whether they think Peppers is an ingredient in that recipe.

they've always thought that. It's just whether or not that remains possible. If it's not, I imagine they're going to get as much as they can.

I do think, if Peppers relents at all from lack of options, they'd take him back. It's never been a question of whether they felt they could win with him, or whether they wanted him, unlike Jenkins.

I don't know that they have as much interest in having him for one year at such an exorbitant price, but it would at least allow them a year to plan. I've had a feeling that the team has struggled to make moves opposite Peppers for fear of upsetting the apple cart, so to speak, and now with or without Peppers they can extend guys on defense (like Gamble, and hopefully Davis) and replace Peppers without that concern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they've always thought that. It's just whether or not that remains possible. If it's not, I imagine they're going to get as much as they can.

I do think, if Peppers relents at all from lack of options, they'd take him back. It's never been a question of whether they felt they could win with him, or whether they wanted him, unlike Jenkins.

I don't know that they have as much interest in having him for one year at such an exorbitant price, but it would at least allow them a year to plan. I've had a feeling that the team has struggled to make moves opposite Peppers for fear of upsetting the apple cart, so to speak, and now with or without Peppers they can extend guys on defense (like Gamble, and hopefully Davis) and replace Peppers without that concern.

Gamble's already extended. Did you mean someone else?

Where do you stand on the other side of the question (taking less just to get rid of him vs holding on unless you get what you want)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What the front office wants is to get the player they drafted in 2002. At an absolute freakish size, Peppers combines amazing speed with incredible strength. In fact, he's only gotten stronger since he was drafted.

Peppers should be the best defensive end in the league right now. I'm not saying that because I'm a homer. I'm saying that because it's 100% true. He has all the physical tools to be the best at his position.

The real question, is why isn't he? Perhaps the front office believes that he still has his best performance ahead of him. Maybe, because he was their first selection, they don't want to accept that fact that he didn't pan out quite like they'd hoped. It could be something else, or a combination of factors.

I've watched this guy off the line of scrimmage for almost every down he's played in a Panthers uniform. While I don't record the games and evaluate them later, I have seen more of Peppers than I can honestly remember. Does he get double teamed? Of course. But, it's not all the time. He's the kind of player that should make teams pay when they choose not to double team him. He rarely makes that happen. This was terrible in 2007, but improved a little this season. However, to be honest, he's still not a top notch DE in my opinion.

Does he just not have the motor to give 100% on every play until the whistle blows? Or is he just in the wrong system?

To me, systems are something you can argue when you're talking about a QB or something like that. Defensive ends have very similar responsibilities throughout the league, and the bottom line is that if you can't shed a block, you can't shed a block. Can he control his gap? Sure, he does it well. But, so does Tyler Brayton, as well as every other average to good DE in the NFL. It's time for Peppers to leave and discover for himself that the only thing holding him back is himself. The front office knows this, and I believe he will be gone before the start of next season. If that means getting less than two 1sts, then so be it. But, someone will pay pretty well to give Peppers a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What the front office wants is to get the player they drafted in 2002. At an absolute freakish size, Peppers combines amazing speed with incredible strength. In fact, he's only gotten stronger since he was drafted.

Peppers should be the best defensive end in the league right now. I'm not saying that because I'm a homer. I'm saying that because it's 100% true. He has all the physical tools to be the best at his position.

The real question, is why isn't he? Perhaps the front office believes that he still has his best performance ahead of him. Maybe, because he was their first selection, they don't want to accept that fact that he didn't pan out quite like they'd hoped. It could be something else, or a combination of factors.

I've watched this guy off the line of scrimmage for almost every down he's played in a Panthers uniform. While I don't record the games and evaluate them later, I have seen more of Peppers than I can honestly remember. Does he get double teamed? Of course. But, it's not all the time. He's the kind of player that should make teams pay when they choose not to double team him. He rarely makes that happen. This was terrible in 2007, but improved a little this season. However, to be honest, he's still not a top notch DE in my opinion.

Does he just not have the motor to give 100% on every play until the whistle blows? Or is he just in the wrong system?

To me, systems are something you can argue when you're talking about a QB or something like that. Defensive ends have very similar responsibilities throughout the league, and the bottom line is that if you can't shed a block, you can't shed a block. Can he control his gap? Sure, he does it well. But, so does Tyler Brayton, as well as every other average to good DE in the NFL. It's time for Peppers to leave and discover for himself that the only thing holding him back is himself. The front office knows this, and I believe he will be gone before the start of next season. If that means getting less than two 1sts, then so be it. But, someone will pay pretty well to give Peppers a chance.

Wasn't it you that said "half-ass Julius" is no better than any other average DE?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why keep Peppers ?

Would he not be a F/A again next season?

Would Panthers not have to franchise him again at a higher rate just to trade him ?

If he does not want a Panther contract,then why keep putting off inevitable.

Yes keep talking about keeping him to force a team {Cowboys,Redskins,Jets ect...] to over spend on the idea Peppers is their missing link.

But please trade him somewhere so this is not a [bret Farve} situation again next season .

All over the Media

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why keep Peppers ?

Would he not be a F/A again next season?

Would Panthers not have to franchise him again at a higher rate just to trade him ?

If he does not want a Panther contract,then why keep putting off inevitable.

Yes keep talking about keeping him to force a team {Cowboys,Redskins,Jets ect...] to over spend on the idea Peppers is their missing link.

But please trade him somewhere so this is not a [bret Farve} situation again next season .

All over the Media

See: Jones, Walter, Seattle Seahawks

The Hawks just kept franchising Jones until he finally signed a long term deal.

Implicit in that action though was the belief that Jones was the best left tackle in the league (and there was evidence to support that belief).

If the Panthers believe that Julius Peppers is the best defensive end in football, then it's conceivable they go the same route.

That's the question at the heart of the issue though. Do they believe that, or is this strategy strictly to ensure that he doesn't leave without us getting something back?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
    • Especially since we’re neck and neck with them for the play in
×
×
  • Create New...