Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mac vs. Windows

Woodcookedbbq

By Woodcookedbbq,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Woodcookedbbq Newbie

Woodcookedbbq

Posted
Posted

For those of you who've had experiences with both systems: Which do you prefer?

I'm looking to get an all in one computer. I see that Macs have very positive reviews, so I'm thinking about jumping ship from PC to Mac. Is the learning curve to the Mac OS pretty hard?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kitten Diver Newbie

Kitten Diver

Posted
Posted

If money is not an issue: Mac.

but I will say that I still don't know all the keyboard shortcuts(which you need to know for manual shutdown and resets) because I work on PC all day.

If you delight in the pr0n sites I have found that I can roam pretty freely and haven't really encountered viruses on the Mac. One thing that does suck is that replacement parts are only made by apple so it is expensive and I believe once the computers says its done there is no way to fix it..but I dunno.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
natty Newbie

natty

Posted
Posted

PC gives you double the performance for half the price. No brainer.

That is very much false. You do usually get more bang for your buck with PCs though(depending on your level of expertise in dealing with PCs).

The real answer is linux. Unless you're a PC gamer there's not a whole lot of reasons not to use Ubuntu. It's gotten easy enough for the masses now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jbland Proficient

jbland

Posted
Posted

I switched to mac about 5 years and would never go back to pc. My mac never freezes, crashes and the battery life on my mac-top is over 6 hours.

Take into account the average pc lasts about three years and the average mac lasts over 6 I think we have a winner. The experience is just better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Darth Biscuit Mentor

Darth Biscuit

Posted
Posted

I switched to mac about 5 years and would never go back to pc. My mac never freezes, crashes and the battery life on my mac-top is over 6 hours.

Take into account the average pc lasts about three years and the average mac lasts over 6 I think we have a winner. The experience is just better.

Everybody's got a different experience... my current main stereo (3D) PC workstation running Windows XP was built in 2003 and is still running strong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Draft intel from ESPN’s Jordan Reid

      By TD alt · Posted

      Oh, now we are "top half?" Keep moving the goal posts. No we aren't. We don't have a surefire WR2, nor do we have a TE that we can count on to consistently make big plays. Our receiving corps is somewhat bland to be honest. It does not have enough juice. Add another playmaker, then we'll likely be top half. Our receiving corps ranked somewhere between 20 and 25 in the league depending upon who you look at. No one has us in the top half based upon last season.
    • MHS831
      It is time to Consider the Likelihood of WR at #19

      By MHS831 · Posted

      It is hard to say--if you look back at our roster from 4 years ago...In addition, we have a ton of money going into our OL right now (which might strengthen the argument to draft a tackle now)  The average NFL career is under 4 years, but the average NFL career for first rounders is 9.3 years, so most get 2 contracts.   So having said that, I look at it as capital--if your concern (legit) becomes an issue, then you should have the same vision and trade that player and draft his replacement.  However, TMAC, Coker, and a rookie is not likely to be a problem for another 4 years--2030.   But to your point, we have a situation right now that the OL has 2 guards and a RT around or over 30.  The make about $70m per year.   I like the perspective of reality you bring, however.  Is that a factor to morgan in 2026?  
    • tukafan21
      It is time to Consider the Likelihood of WR at #19

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I have no problem drafting a WR, even as high as the 2nd, but I do have an issue with using a precious 1st rounder on it. Another WR is a need, but we also have a lot of other needs, and the goal should always be to draft 1st rounders that you expect to be on the team for 10 years if they stay healthy. In regards to Coker, one of two things happen.  He keeps getting better and becomes our legit #2 to T-Mac and we have to pay him accordingly, or he doesn’t. If he does, then using that 1st rounder on a WR this year was dumb.  If he doesn’t, then drafting a WR in the 1st this year would be smart, but then so would trading Coker when his perceived value would be at its highest. If we were already had a SB contending roster, then yes, a 1st Round WR to put us over the top makes sense, but we just have too many holes to fill to use it that way… again, unless the staff just doesn’t believe in Coker’s ability to become a true #2, which I think he really can be.
×
×
  • Create New...