Dbag smith still talking crap

[Lords0fPain]

I look forward to the next pdf you pull from google that you haven't read which doesn't defend your original assertion

We have an entire forum for people like you to piss in each others' mouths. How about you take Highlandfire there and don't come back.

Since you are looking forward to it. One from their own editors:

THE PUBLIC EDITOR; Is The New York Times a Liberal Newspaper?

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/25/opinion/the-public-editor-is-the-new-york-times-a-liberal-newspaper.html?src=pm

[Fiz]

[Lords0fPain]

nice rebuttal...especially since you where the jackhole that had to make a big deal out of nothing..:rolleyes:

[DaveThePanther2008]

You're in the minority with your opinion on placing blame.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d81fe4767/article/poll-owners-more-to-blame-than-players-for-labor-strife

Wow. Just wow. Who are you, Dave D Rockefeller?

What a bogus poll. How many of the 1000+ that were survey were actually fans. Over 30% could careless. Sounds like not many.

You must be one of the bench warmers trying to get more money than you deserve.

[Guest]

this poll shows that my opinion is in the minority. what a bogus poll. i for one only accept poll results when they confirm my position, therefore i must now insult you, you bench warming parasite.

[The NFL Shield At Midfield]

Thread recap:

-lordsofpain drags liberal vs. conservative bullpoo into the issue like he does in every lockout thread, something I'm surprised more people haven't noticed

-he eventually cites a New York Times article which backs his point of view up, so you know he's super right because the NYT is a liberal rag and bah gawd if they'd stoop to reporting on a union losing in court...

-Fiz brings up inconsistencies with this viewpoint

-lordsofpain posts a bunch of stuff about how NYT's editorial page is biased as if it's generally not well known that an editorial page = opinion page. Also the fact that it's written in the last ten years makes it okay that it's not topical at all.

-Points about Thomas Friedman and others remain unaddressed, lordsofpain ironically accuses Fiz of cherry picking information and then calls him a "jackhole" for making a big deal out of nothing

-Everyone looks forward to the next shrill lockout thread where lordsofpain and highlandfire howl at the moon about "liberal judges" and "lib newspapers"

You're welcome

[Bama Panther]

Judges who must have been purely politically neutral ... right? RIGHT!? :rolleyes:

whose judges are conservatives. it doesnt matter what court they appealed to they knew they were in favor when they decided to appeal to that court. just like the players knew they were in favor in Minnesota. it is other circuit courts they could have appealed to.

Are you guys both dense? The owners had absolutely no say in what circuit they appealed to. The players brought the original suit, leaving the owners only one circuit court to appeal to. The players forum shopped for Judge Nelson. They got bitten by the circuit court responsible for her district.

Again, the owners only had one option as far as appellate court. The players chose that court by choosing where to originally file their suit.

[Rhys]

What a bogus poll. How many of the 1000+ that were survey were actually fans. Over 30% could careless. Sounds like not many.

You must be one of the bench warmers trying to get more money than you deserve.

Nice one.

You probably never took statistics in college or high school, not that you attended either, so I can understand why a poll such as this would be a little over your head.

You must be an old decrepit out of touch privileged white male who thinks you deserve more than others.

[Rhys]

Are you guys both dense? The owners had absolutely no say in what circuit they appealed to. The players brought the original suit, leaving the owners only one circuit court to appeal to. The players forum shopped for Judge Nelson. They got bitten by the circuit court responsible for her district.

Again, the owners only had one option as far as appellate court. The players chose that court by choosing where to originally file their suit.

Hmm, interesting, I don't remember trying to argue the amount of 'say' the owners or players had in choosing courts.

Oh look, you've quoted me.

I'm right, I didn't try to argue that at all. I wonder if you had understood the context of my comment you might of understood I was pointing out the naivety in thinking the 8th circuit has no political persuasion. But alas, that may be asking too much.

[Lords0fPain]

Thread recap:

-lordsofpain drags liberal vs. conservative bullpoo into the issue like he does in every lockout thread, something I'm surprised more people haven't noticed

-he eventually cites a New York Times article which backs his point of view up, so you know he's super right because the NYT is a liberal rag and bah gawd if they'd stoop to reporting on a union losing in court...

-Fiz brings up inconsistencies with this viewpoint

-lordsofpain posts a bunch of stuff about how NYT's editorial page is biased as if it's generally not well known that an editorial page = opinion page. Also the fact that it's written in the last ten years makes it okay that it's not topical at all.

-Points about Thomas Friedman and others remain unaddressed, lordsofpain ironically accuses Fiz of cherry picking information and then calls him a "jackhole" for making a big deal out of nothing

-Everyone looks forward to the next shrill lockout thread where lordsofpain and highlandfire howl at the moon about "liberal judges" and "lib newspapers"

You're welcome

Another one that missed the point...I post an article that said the owners would probably win the appeal....fiz gets upset, because i called his all important crap paper the New York Slimes and he asks why and I tell him...he then get his panties in an uproar again, and starts personally insulting me....I go on the internet to find backing, which the research paper did (with all 4 of the crap papers) to prove my point that NYT a liberal news paper and an article from one of their own (which had you bother to read before butting in), addressed more than editorial page. Proving my point once again.

Saying this has nothing to do with political view points of these judges, is either naive or you are in denial. The fact all 3 liberal judges side with the union (every time) and the 2 conservative judges side with owners, must be purely coincidence...:rolleyes:

[Lords0fPain]

From peer reviewed paper.

http://www.newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/Media-Bias-Is-Real-Finds-UCLA-6664.aspx?RelNum=6664

[jherald]

Boy did this post go south.

[Sandy Claws]

Slightly larger sampler size. It appears that the worm has turned.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/17/the-latest-labor-dispute-poll/

[Sandy Claws]

Slightly larger sampler size. It appears that the worm has turned.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/17/the-latest-labor-dispute-poll/