Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If I were an Owner


Recommended Posts

If I were an owner.

I would invite the whole team in for a discussion. I would lay out the proposal that was submitted to to the player association/Union. I would listen to what the they had to say about the situation. Maybe even write down minor changes.

Then I would put the deal on the table. This is where we are. Negotiations can happen if they want it to. The majority of the players want to play. I believe once you BREAK the union or alliance or association or WTFever. The deal will get done.

What is the problem

1. If there is a cap on spending. (agreed upon and raised or lowered based on the previous season)

2. If there is a minimum a team can spend

3. If the rookie salary cap is addressed

4. If the veterans are cared for

5. The owners can improve their stadiums and enjoy the profits of the game and the players get their dues.

There isn't a Union (or is there?) so the teams could have a discussion with individual players.

If the owners invite a bunch of players and they all decline then the owners could use that as proof the the players are still unionized. Make their point even stronger in the upcoming June 3rd ruling.

Either way.. The owners can break this player association but simply inviting them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

union or not...players and owners aren't allowed to talk.

As per the owner imposed lockout? Couldn't they allow it, if the owners all agreed to it.

Don't you agree that The starters that worked their way into a starting position, backups, special teams and practices squad guys make up the majority of the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's a nice idea.

won't happen. would really only serve to muddy everything up. both sides have strength in numbers. it isn't a team by team issue. they aren't individual entities. the owners need to act as a group as do the players. it's in their best interest to do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't necessarily agree. I think half the problem is the representatives are not showing the players what has been offered. I think they are being treated like mushrooms.

Kept in a closet and fed $hit.

I think what the owners has offered is more than fair and reasonable. It is the D. Smith and his bunch that are keeping this in the courts instead of at the bargaining table.

Best way, IMO, is to get the players to apply some pressure from their side. BREAK THE UNION..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*owners opt out of the cba*

*owners lock the players out*

*court ends lockout*

*owners fight in court for the reinstatement of the lockout*

goddammit d-bag smith you thug, you're just forcing this lockout and keeping the dispute in the courts. just do the honorable thing and capitulate to the billionaires who opted out of the cba to begin with

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe we should have them hold hands and sing kumbaya.

If I were an owner I would fire allot of attorneys and get this out of the court system and start negotiating.

My opinion is this is headed to August September or longer until the players feel the financial pinch of not receiving a paycheck.The players need to realize that reality.The owners are losing fan base and don't make money w/o football. Somewhere in the middle is the answer and they should find it sooner rather than later.There are some very smart people who should realize that the court system route could be in place for months if not years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...

I think what the owners has offered is more than fair and reasonable.

It is the D. Smith and his bunch that are keeping this in the courts instead of at the bargai

Best way, IMO, is to get the players to apply some pressure from their side. BREAK THE UNION..

Let's keep this in perspective..

The OWNERS are suing to keep the UNION in place.

They love the exemption to monopoly laws that let them negotiate between each other for players (i.e. the Draft) and for contracts ( officially licensed products, broadcast rights, and trading player contracts). In order to gain these advantages of monopoly the union must exist by law passed in congress to exempt the NFL.

Eliminating the union would end up eliminating free agency, the draft, playing AFC teams, etc..

So freak out as you want, but even DeMarcus Smith is a cooler head on this subject..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The OWNERS are suing to keep the UNION in place.

Wrong. The players filed the original suit. Without that filing, there was no mention of the owners intending to bring any suit in court. Are they appealing the lower court's decision? Yes, but why would you not if you lost a suit filed against you. They have always said the best way to handle this is for both sides to negotiate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wrong. The players filed the original suit. Without that filing, there was no mention of the owners intending to bring any suit in court. Are they appealing the lower court's decision? Yes, but why would you not if you lost a suit filed against you. They have always said the best way to handle this is for both sides to negotiate.

they filed the suit to stop the lockout. please tell me who put the lockout into effect again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This was soooo spot on about everything from the board environment to the QB guru extremist terrible takes. I wish more people on this board would elevate their energy and knowledge so we could have a fun board again. Cheers to better Panther Fan Culture.
    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
×
×
  • Create New...