Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tender offers?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Is there any reason not to offer a player the lowest tender? I mean, sure, if the guy is really good and you want to keep him, you go with a higher tender. However, what if he's a nobody and a decent ST or depth player? Couldn't you just get away with that player having a basically non-existent cap figure for another year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do you think any teams have interest in him as a starter. in a 3-4 or 4-3

I think he was JP before JP..in other words stated his desire to play in a 3-4. :D

He would be an ILB in a 3-4, IMO. This year is supposed to be a good one for OLB conversions from DE per a few draft guys like Mayock. Coupled with the 2 new teams running the 3-4 (Den & GB), he may have a better shot at a gig this year than last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoa :sosp:

As we already knew, they tendered TE Jeff King at $1.545 million, and LB James Anderson at $1.01 million. The team just announced, they tendered S Nate Salley (almost certainly at $1.01, though they didn't say), but not DT Gary Gibson.

They also tendered deals to exclusive rights free agents DT Nick Hayden and CB C.J. Wilson, but not DT J'Vonne Parker and WR Jason Carter.

Gibson and Carter will likely be back later, not sure about Parker.

Tenders In

Gibson and Carter are now officially unrestricted free agents. They still could land here with minimal deals, of course. Still, quite a surprise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Regardless of how we got here, any rational fan should be excited by how well Bryce played down the stretch. Anyone not happy about that level of play either doesn't know what they're looking at, or they're still trying to drive tired narratives. Obviously, Cam had an all-time rookie season, and I'm not putting the two in the same basket yet, but as someone who has watched every snap of Panthers football since the start of the new millennium (Im old), Bryce was playing at a higher level at the end of 2024 than Cam was at the end of 2012 (his 2nd season). Cam continued to develop into MVP form, something Bryce has to prove, but as someone who watched both (and will stan for Cam always), Bryce was playing at a higher level to end year 2 than Cam did.  Go watch the film if you dont believe me. None of that means anything for the future. But the people who said BY9 couldnt play in this league are wrong.   That being said, the only thing that matters is this year. #20 is perfectly fair IMO going into the season. I mean think about it, how would you rank him??!  His in-season turnaround is one of the wildest things I've ever seen... how do you rank a guy who looked like a massive bust in September and by January was consistently playing at a top 10 level? My excitement level is pretty damn high heading into this season. There were throws from the Chiefs game onward where Bryce had Drew Brees levels of anticipation. Im excited to see what he can do with a full deck on offense, something we really never gave Cam. Really hope and expect Bryce to move up this list this season.  
    • Not really, the only QB's (other than Anthony Richardson) ranked below him are new to their teams as a placeholder starter or drafted in 2024 or 2025, not a lot of gymnastics to get there. It's not about how many that is, if it's 20, 12, or 2... It means there isn't a QB who's team has committed to them for the long term right now that they have ranked below Bryce. That's not a great thing.
    • The changes to onside kicks were ridiculous and ruined a significant part of the game     It was already a high risk low reward play.  Why change it?
×
×
  • Create New...