Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For Matt Moore: Bad News and Good News


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

First, the bad news.

For those who were around early last year, you might remember I posted a couple of time about how the Panthers website was talking up Matt Moore's play while acknowledging poor play from Jake Delhomme. This I took as a sign that Moore would likely go into next season as the starter. It turned into a debate with GMan is Dumb, which he lost in spectacular fashion and has since departed or renamed himself.

Fast forward to this season, and if you want to go back to the Panthers site as a sign of things to come, here's one sign that's not so good: Turner following father's footsteps

The article describes Scott Turner's path to his current position as Panthers offensive QC. It includes this blurb:

Turner turned his attention to coaching. He served as a graduate assistant at Oregon State in 2005 and coached for two years on the high school level before accepting an offensive assistant position at the University of Pittsburgh in 2008.

What's significant about that? Turner's job at Oregon State involved working with the offense, and specifically with the starting QB for Oregon State that season, a young fellow by the name of Matt Moore.

Up till now, Panther officials have mentioned Moore plenty - and even tendered him a fairly significant offer - but now a story in which it would be perfectly natural to mention him gets printed, and no mention at all. I went into the story expecting to see that discussed, but Turner's time at Oregon State is little more than a transitional sentence. The prior connection with Moore? Left out.

So, is neglecting that particular little detail just a whiff on the part of site writer Bryan Strickland, or was that fact deliberately left out - or edited out - to avoid mention of Moore?

You tell me.

There is good news for Moore though. via Russ Lande of The Sporting News: Matt Moore might be best young QB on free-agent market

BOTTOM LINE: Moore is perhaps the most intriguing QB available this offseason. For a player who was undrafted out of Oregon State and then cut by the Cowboys in 2007, Moore has shown the ability to produce. In 2009, he was 4-1 as a starter and had a passer rating of 98.5. Although Moore battled through injuries last season, he still played well in two games (against the 49ers and Rams). He showed the same passing skills in those games that he had displayed in 2009, when he made a case that he could become a good starting QB. Moore was a restricted free agent last offseason, and with four years of experience, he could be an unrestricted free agent this year. With the unsettled labor situation, however, he may end up as a restricted free agent again. Based on film study, he might be the best of the young quarterbacks available in the 2011 free-agent pool. And if he gets back to his pre-injury form, he can develop into a very good starter in time. Moore was expected to be fully healthy sometime in May, so he should be ready to play for whatever team signs him in 2011.

Lande says Moore has good accuracy and a strong arm, but acknowledges that he's had struggles with injuries and hasn't always done well when pressured. Still, he rates Moore overall as a 7.9 on a 9 point scale and says he may be one of the more "intriguing" prospects out there when free agency finally starts.

So for Moore, he may indeed have a chance to prove that he can be a full time starter. It just might not be with the Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've believed pretty much all along that Moore would get a shot to compete in training camp. Hurney talked about him as someone they definitely wanted back and when he referred to his issues last year, he never mentioned "struggles", only "injuries".

Add in that when you look at their respective skill sets, Moore is actually much better suited to run a Coryell offense than Clausen is.

Still, Moore was an undrafted free agent and Clausen was a high draft pick, a recent one at that.

The failure to mention Moore could indeed just be a miscue on the part of the writer, or maybe something he didn't feel was relevant.

Or... :sosp:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see Matt Moore leaving as bad news. Afterall, it'd mean he'd be taking TRD with him.

I thought TRD was Matt.

I really do like Matt Moore. Flame me if you want but he was thrown into a bad situation with minimal development time and performed well.

As for liking TRD, meh :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've believed pretty much all along that Moore would get a shot to compete in training camp. Hurney talked about him as someone they definitely wanted back and when he referred to his issues last year, he never mentioned "struggles", only "injuries".

Add in that when you look at their respective skill sets, Moore is actually much better suited to run a Coryell offense than Clausen is.

Still, Moore was an undrafted free agent and Clausen was a high draft pick, a recent one at that.

The failure to mention Moore could indeed just be a miscue on the part of the writer, or maybe something he didn't feel was relevant.

Or... :sosp:

Agree 100%......that just amplifies how dumb it will be for Carolina to waste a roster spot this season on Clausen. Clasuen is going to waste a spot this year and then they will move on......scrapping him in camp and giving Moore a spot imo would be the wiser move.

Time to admit Carolina made a mistake drafting QBs during a lameduck coaches last year. Made no sense then.......the time to go after young QBs was once a new staff was brought on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree 100%......that just amplifies how dumb it will be for Carolina to waste a roster spot this season on Clausen. Clasuen is going to waste a spot this year and then they will move on......scrapping him in camp and giving Moore a spot imo would be the wiser move.

Time to admit Carolina made a mistake drafting QBs during a lameduck coaches last year. Made no sense then.......the time to go after young QBs was once a new staff was brought on.

Generally not a good idea to give up on a rookie after only one year in a bad situation.

With that said, it wouldn't exactly kill me if we wound up keeping Moore over Clausen. I just don't expect it to happen.

Sad reality is that the lame duck coach who didn't like Clausen is gone. The GM who did (and apparently still does) is right where he was last year.

I'm not on the "fire Hurney" bandwagon, mind you, but this is one of those times I wish he'd at least consider cutting bait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love Matt Moore. I thought he would save our franchise much like Delhomme did before he threw 5 picks in the Arizona game. He just never materialized due in part to injuries. :-( I'd like to see us retain him if possible, but if not I will wish him the best elsewhere. I'm a fan of the game, so I'll always follow former players and players that I like in college! There's nothing like the NFL!

If Moore leaving means TRD goes too... Then I hope we can get rid of Moore ASAP! Lol

I'm just kidding!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Generally not a good idea to give up on a rookie after only one year in a bad situation.

With that said, it wouldn't exactly kill me if we wound up keeping Moore over Clausen. I just don't expect it to happen.

Sad reality is that the lame duck coach who didn't like Clausen is gone. The GM who did (and apparently still does) is right where he was last year.

I'm not on the "fire Hurney" bandwagon, mind you, but this is one of those times I wish he'd at least consider cutting bait.

generally a good idea to give up on a bad QB OR a player who doesn't fit what you do though......

I feel bad for both Pike and Clausen. Carolina should not have drafted any QBs considering they knew Fox was leaving (netiher fit Fox) and it was an uknown what direction Carolina's offense would go.

Me wanting Clausen to stay or for Carolina to just move on came down to the new coach and offense......I think the wisest move is to move on. Teams have moved on from 2nd round QBs in the recent history and I think Carolina should join that group.

Vet/Cam/Moore (regardless of order) sounds more promising for this offense than anything that includes Clausen. No matter how hard he works he just doesn't fit........and NFL success/failure is heavily dependant on being drafted by a team where you fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we have to have some veteran presence in there. Otherwise we're just too young at quarterback.

You could make an argument for Moore as that veteran presence, but what you really want in that role is someone who's done it for way longer than Moore has, and had a higher overall success rate.

Much as I like Moore, I have my doubts that he fits in this year's puzzle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, the bad news.

For those who were around early last year, you might remember I posted a couple of time about how the Panthers website was talking up Matt Moore's play while acknowledging poor play from Jake Delhomme. This I took as a sign that Moore would likely go into next season as the starter. It turned into a debate with GMan is Dumb, which he lost in spectacular fashion and has since departed or renamed himself.

pretty sure he was a troll.. and did his job admirably. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gonna have a hard time finding someone in FA that has a better W/L percentage than Moore. More experience starting will be a little easier but not much.

I think someone goes after him for a starting gig in FA. Something we can't offer him. Good luck Matt I will always be a fan.

As for Pickles? Who knows, hopefully he can be a competent back up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean you can always talk good or bad in just about everything. 8 wins and leading poo mountain, this rookie class is a big reason. Think about no Tmac or Dan Morgan didn't make that trade to gain a future 2nd rounder. So after Pat Jones breaks his back, DJ " who's not on any roster or PS" Johnson would be starting. Gods knows how bad they already are- 32nd in sacks/pressure/PDs etc... Sure Prince, Trevor, Cam, and little Jimmy haven't done too much, but they are still here.  Honestly its not smart or wise to judge rookies, *unless pro-bowl or cut. Lets revisit this next year, there are slump sophomore years and the biggest jump in players careers most times happens in the 2nd full off-season. You see who wants to be NFL pro and who's happy with teppers checks. I know many of them will be getting surgeries, got to see how they attack that as well....Tmac is playing hurt currently, if they were out of the race, he would be IR'd and maybe half the rookie class as well....I thought Cam was headed for the IR. 
    • It actually looks pretty solid.  A few players to re-sign and three primary positions to upgrade (starters).  Beyond that, we don't have a bunch of holes or need to overpay free agents. this is how I see it (using OTC for the 2026 roster information) on December 22, 2025.  This is rather basic, focusing on the core needs. Blue: Potential players to re-sign in the offseason.  Green: Players under contract for the 2026 season.  Italics: Possible cap casualties Analysis   Offense:  Center:  First, sign Mays for the long term (He is 26–I’d give him a 3-4 year deal).  He is not great, but he is decent and we need consistency on the OL. He does not make stupid mistakes. While the draft is not great in the interior offensive line, signing a veteran who can backup G and C would be a strategy.   Guard:  Canalas seemed to be impressed with Curhan, as I was.  He will be 28 next year, so he has a few years in him. I think he comes cheap and is quality depth.  He can play center, but is perhaps best at G and T.  Valuable reserve.   Tackle:  While Nijman returns as the swing T behind Moton and Ekwonu, the Panthers need to start developing a RT to play behind Moton.  A late-round draft pick that is rough but has all the tools is ideal. As the fourth OT, he can develop behind some pretty good veterans.   Wide Receiver:  We need a playmaker to play opposite TMac.  I believe in Coker, but think he is the AT-type slot. He needs to be re-signed. XL cannot be counted on to step into that role.  He is not that familiar with the WR position and he does not seem to be a student of the game.  This is a strong WR draft. First or second round.   Tight End:  I dunno.  I can see us upgrading the position, but Tremble does a lot of stuff well aside from catching the ball.  Evans is a decent all-around TE, and Sanders has some upside.  I’d love a weapon, but add the WR.   Running Back:  If Dowdle wants to be here, how do you let him walk?  He will be 28, and most RBs hit the wall then.  He deserves a big contract, but 28-year old RBs on big deals don’t earn them.  Go with Hubbard, Brooks, and Etienne.  Build the OL and the backs get better.   Quarterback:  Well, Bryce is improving and his confidence is growing.  Look at how many other QBs have taken time to get it. He is going to be the QB, regardless.  I want a young QB behind him, not the Red Senior Citizen.     Overview: Free Agent Priorities are to re-sign Mays and Coker.  I have Dowdle in blue, but I would let him walk (for reasons provided).  Cuhran played well and is versatile and should be signed if possible.  Draft a developmental OT, a raw, late-round OT.  In the draft, take a WR in rounds 1 or 2.  The offense is in tact–little needs to be done.  Let the OL develop chemistry, sign Mays while he is entering his prime, and get a weapon opposite TMac.  Give Coker a long-term deal.    Defense: ILB;  With only Wallace on the 2026 payroll, this position needs to be addressed.  Rozeboom might be able to be re-signed. I think ILB will be addressed in free agency and the draft. ILB will be the second or third round pick.  We will re-sign Rozeboom and maybe Cherulus and another priority free agent.   Edge/OLB: Scourton seems to be the real deal, but Princely (needs to develop) and Jones II are role players.  The draft is LOADED at the edge rush position.  I expect a first or second round edge player to be taken.   Defensive Tackle:  We have some big salaries at DT, and with Brown on the field, you dont need stars beside him.  I think the team cuts Robinson to get $8.5m in cap room, especially since C Jackson seems to be ready.     Cornerback:  Morgan has done a tremendous job finding talent in the bargain bins at CB.  Smith-Wade has been very solid.  Thornton seems to be a find.  Mike Jackson is a solid pro.     Safety:  Ransom seems to be the heir apparent for the Scott job, and Moehrig gives them a very aggressive, violent pair of safeties.  I like the safeties in this draft, fwiw.  I expect a late round pick.   Overview:  The Panthers must address ILB and Edge as priorities.  The ILB could be a free agent, Rozeboom re-signing, and maybe a draft pick. However, they need a pass rush more than anything else.   This is a great draft for edge players; I would not be surprised to see Dan Morgan double dip at edge.  Depth at S.   As soon as the season is over, look for Morgan to re-sign Mays, Coker, Cuhran, and possibly Rozeboom and Dowdle.  That would lock up the starting C, #3/slot WR, versatile depth on the OL, and get your leading tackler back at ILB.  Three HUGE moves that sould not break the bank.   Free agency would be focused on adding an ILB and a Safety who can play FS in three-S or big nickel sets. The draft would target Edge, WR, and ILB on days 1 and 2. Day 3:  OT depth, S depth, ILB depth.  
    • Seattle is coming across country to our house which will be packed.  We can beat this damn team.  Agree @TheBigKat the team has improved tremendously from last season
×
×
  • Create New...