Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Goodell still says fans want 18 games


jtnc

Recommended Posts

Worst Commissioner ever, and I stand by that. This guy just won't stop adding more fuel to the fire. I hope this isn't one of the issues they're arguing over in mediation cause it's pointless. Lockout will never get resolved with this fool bringing this up.

“We do think it is attractive to season-ticket holders. I hear that all of the time from our season-ticket holders,” Goodell said on a conference call with Titans season ticket holders. "We have not abandoned our position on that. We do think it is the right thing for the game. It improves the quality of what we do, and it improves the value for you as season-ticket holders. … We do think it is a benefit for everybody, but we want to do it the right way, and we want to do it responsibly. That includes the players’ perspective.”

http://eye-on-football.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/22475988/29610757

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Worst Commissioner ever, and I stand by that. This guy just won't stop adding more fuel to the fire. I hope this isn't one of the issues they're arguing over in mediation cause it's pointless. Lockout will never get resolved with this fool bringing this up.

http://eye-on-football.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/22475988/29610757

I have no problem with 18 games, and he is right season tickets holders would rather pay for tickets to real games, not preseason games. Thats all they are doing, not "adding" 2 games, just trading 2 worthless preseason games out for 2 regular season games... that count. Don't think they are making it up, the owners do send out surveys to SEASON ticket holds...:eek:

Its more fans in the seats, buying hotel rooms to concessions. More televised games (advertisement, t.v. deals). Players and owners make more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this 18 game proposal is the reason why we cant get a CBA then I do not want

No, the owners already said they would not do it, til the players agree...dbag wants to see the books of a private (which does not have to publicly show their books) company (the NFL)...thats why they can't get a deal done...:rolleyes: dbag wants 50/50 without taking expenses in to consideration...and would get a woody, if he can take it to the Supreme Court...

The Packers are publicly traded...they do have to open their books...and they do...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if demaurice smith's personality was more like goodell's, we'd have a deal already.

goodell isn't the problem here. it's the litigation only mentality of smith.

While I can at least in part agree with that, I still really wish he'd let this 18 game thing die and be buried.

I've never seen anything that made me believe this is something "the fans want". Just the opposite, honestly.

When Goodell claims he's pushing it for the sake of the fans, he makes himself look stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, the owners already said they would not do it, til the players agree...dbag wants to see the books of a private (which does not have to publicly show their books) company (the NFL)...thats why they can't get a deal done...:rolleyes:

Also, the owners want them to take a worse deal for no reason. They are both stubborn and ruining this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I can at least in part agree with that, I still really wish he'd let this 18 game thing die and be buried.

I've never seen anything that made me believe this is something "the fans want". Just the opposite, honestly.

When Goodell claims he's pushing it for the sake of the fans, he makes himself look stupid.

if they were actually negotiating/talking about things, i seriously doubt that this would be something seen as a hard and fast requirement of a deal. it could be negotiated out easily.

gooddell is still acting like this could all be discussed in a meeting between the two sides. smith will never allow that meeting to take place unless forced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, the owners want them to take a worse deal for no reason. They are both stubborn and ruining this season.
it's the owners fault they got into the situation, but it's smith's fault they haven't worked something out.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I can at least in part agree with that, I still really wish he'd let this 18 game thing die and be buried.

I've never seen anything that made me believe this is something "the fans want". Just the opposite, honestly.

When Goodell claims he's pushing it for the sake of the fans, he makes himself look stupid.

Are you sure? He is going by SEASON ticket holders, not single game ticket buyers or ppl that sit at home watching the boob tube for free...

Think its short sighted to think alot of SEASON tickets holders don't want it. I have heard that for quite a few years prior to this lockout mess, SEASON tickets hated have to pay for preseason games that mean nothing and few people go (season ticket holders or single ticket buyers)....:eek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if they were actually negotiating/talking about things, i seriously doubt that this would be something seen as a hard and fast requirement of a deal. it could be negotiated out easily.

gooddell is still acting like this could all be discussed in a meeting between the two sides. smith will never allow that meeting to take place unless forced.

Agree that Smith is the prime mover behind the whole "take them to court" strategy. No great surprise that a lawyer thinks litigation is the answer (and I'll laugh my rump off if that ultimately backfires).

No argument there. I just wish the whole 'expanded season' idea would fade away forever (and take the 'international expansion' and 'need a team in L.A.' crap with it).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's the owners fault they got into the situation, but it's smith's fault they haven't worked something out.

There's really nothing to work out. The owners want a better deal, and the players don't want to give anything up. You can't just talk that out. So they are going to have to be told by a court who has the advantage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you sure? He is going by SEASON ticket holders, not single game ticket buyers or ppl that sit at home watching the boob tube for free...

Think its short sighted to think alot of SEASON tickets holders don't want it. I have heard that for quite a few years prior to this lockout mess, SEASON tickets hated have to pay for preseason games that mean nothing and few people go (season ticket holders or single ticket buyers)....:eek:

From the article...

But here’s the thing, and Yahoo! Sports’ Doug Farrar points it out: Goodell has participated in 19 conference calls like this, and after reading transcripts of the talks, hardly any fan has mentioned wanting what Goodell says the fans want.

Also pretty much no denying the idea is almost universally hated by the players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • THE WALKER BACKGROUND Here is where this gets weird.  Walker is a serviceable LT who could benefit from Gilbert's experience and coaching.  However, he is known for below-average run blocking and frequent penalties.  As you know, a penalty from a LT is a drive killer. A former 7th round pick, Walker has outperformed expectations, but he still ranks around the middle of the pack when compared to other tackles.  Having said that, it seems as if the Panthers are banking on Walker for a year and will then make a decision on Ickey.  In Green Bay, Walker was the starter, but the Packers weren't exactly sold on him. While most people think the oft-injured David Bakhtiari retired in 2023, he really wanted to keep playing.  He was released on March, 11, 2024.  Walker stepped in and took the reserve LT job from Nijman in that 2023 season, but they were close--probably because Nijman was more of a swing OT.  However, Nijman was a free agent in 2024, so the Panthers signed him just a week after Bakhtiari was released, leaving the Packers only Walker to play LT.  A month later, the Packers drafted a LT in the first round, Jordan Morgan out of Arizona.  Most Packer fans believe that Morgan would have beat out Walker for the LT job in 2024, but he had some shoulder injuries and went to IR after 6 games. In 2025, when the Packers had an injury at G during the season, instead of putting Morgan in at LT for Walker as planned, they played Morgan to guard because Walker can only play 1 position.  The Packers currently project Morgan back to LT for 2026, which is probably why they did not seek to retain Walker, at least in part. Based on this history, it is safe to say this: Walker is better than Nijman. We have the benefit of them being on the same team in a direct competition to help us see that. Walker is probably closer to Ickey, except for the penalties.  That bothers me a lot.  Bryce sucks when we get behind the sticks, and a run-first offense with a poor run-blocking LT is not ideal.   Regardless, I think Ickey and the Panthers find themselves in limbo right now, so the Walker deal comes at a perfect time for the GM.  Gilbert, perhaps, can work on the penalties and maybe a TE like Tremble can help offset the run blocking issues, so maybe we can actually stay the course at OT.  Maybe we do not draft a LT--maybe we draft a RT to groom behind Moton.  Maybe we draft a C.  At LT, the Panthers do not want to overreact, especially if Ickey returns to form or Walker demonstrates improvement.  Depth is certainly a concern, but a solid RT can be that depth.   I doubt the Panthers draft a LT in rounds one or maybe two.  It seems we have bigger needs at Will LB, DT, TE, and maybe S.  
    • THIS! IF we go offense at 19, it should be the trenches, which is no longer a pressing need with Waler's signing. 3 biggest needs in 2026, IMO, are DT, FS, ILB. We need to upgrade our starters at those positions and I expect anyone rafted at 19 to start immediately. I could rationalize OT (right or left) or CB since we're an injury away from a severe drop off AND have huge offseason concerns at both next year. Unless Bryce plays a lot better, I want to upgrade QB next year so I could get behind locking in a 2027 starter this year if the right guy is there. You COULD argue NCB and TE are positions where we need to upgrade our starters, sure, but not at 19. Both positions can still be upgraded on day 2.
    • He's firmly a second rounder and I don't think we would go that high for a TE this draft.  Third?  Possibly. I mean Rhule drafted Tremble in the third round who clearly was just a blocking TE.  
×
×
  • Create New...