Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Travelle Wharton


davos

Recommended Posts

He's been starting for us for quite some time now and I honestly still have no damn idea how talented or productive he truly is. I will admit I'm not one who really understands how good linemen are beyond the statbook.

My main question: How actually good is he? It seems for the last 4 years everyone has been convinced we have a great o-line and then 1 or two injuries happen and our lack of depth then position changes kill us.

What I'm trying to say is that Wharton is neglected whether its about being a solid player or one lacking talent. So, I open this up to see what people actually think of him and if we can improve at his spot with a better talent down the road...not immediately this year.

I mean, we've gone on for a while now about how supposedly great our o-line is when they're healthy; but I'm somewhat cautious about calling them great when really double-trouble's monster year a while back was their only real showing of "greatness" imho.

Wharton talk: go

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our O line got a bit overrated by the 2008 season.

Our run game got a bit overrated by the 2008 season.

That said, we do have a pretty good line in run O, and an OK line in pass O.

The running game would be great if we had a passing attack, or an o coordinator with some balls/imagination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's been starting for us for quite some time now and I honestly still have no damn idea how talented or productive he truly is. I will admit I'm not one who really understands how good linemen are beyond the statbook.

My main question: How actually good is he? It seems for the last 4 years everyone has been convinced we have a great o-line and then 1 or two injuries happen and our lack of depth then position changes kill us.

What I'm trying to say is that Wharton is neglected whether its about being a solid player or one lacking talent. So, I open this up to see what people actually think of him and if we can improve at his spot with a better talent down the road...not immediately this year.

I mean, we've gone on for a while now about how supposedly great our o-line is when they're healthy; but I'm somewhat cautious about calling them great when really double-trouble's monster year a while back was their only real showing of "greatness" imho.

Wharton talk: go

While not a great player, Wharton has been one of our more consistent and solid starters on the OL. He and Gross have formed quite a tandem on the left side for the past few years. I think he's got a few years left; however we definitely can improve at the LG spot, as Wharton has been bothered by nagging injuries and he has been with us awhile. I was hoping Duke Robinson would be the heir apparent to the LG spot, but we may it be open competition between him, Bernardeau and Ziemba.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wharton is a dang good G. He also is diverse enough that he can slide out and do what he did in 2009 at the T spot.

Chemistry among the line and QB play are two huge factors that I think people don't focus enough on. If you shuffle the line too much they aren't gonna look good b/c injury and QB imo is one of the bigggest factors in how a OL looks in pass protection. Bad QB play will make any OL look like garbage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To kick this up, The Athletic has a really comprehensive piece out where pretty much all QB questions are addressed. It is worth seeing.  https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7083539/2026/03/04/starting-quarterback-projections-free-agency-draft/?source=user_shared_article I’m putting something specific here but it should have a thread or something. It is an extensive exercise.  This is a dense write up with a lot of column inches used, about the Jets and Murray and Reich, all this stuff.. then it goes to backup QB and there is Dalton.  I am pasting that part: As for Dalton, Reich is installing the offense he was trying to run in Carolina in 2023 before he got fired, and Dalton was with the Panthers then; he’s an ideal option as a veteran backup to replace Taylor. Reich said this about Dalton in 2023: “The way he's throwing the football, the way he works through progressions, the way he handles the operation. … Since day one (when) he walked in the door, I'm like, 'This guy is starter-worthy.' You guys know I've said that all along. He's, in my opinion, one of the best 32 quarterbacks in the world.” ——— That’s true love lol. I never heard any of this. Pretty crazy I think, considering how the year went.   Anyway the dream is not dead. . 
    • The Seahawks traded for wide receiver/returner Rashid Shaheed at the trade deadline. He proved to be a key acquisition. Shaheed returned a punt and a kickoff for touchdowns in the regular season and had a 95-yard kickoff return in the postseason. Shaheed, though, is scheduled for free agency. So, the 12 games he played, including the postseason, might be the extent of his time in Seattle. Adam Schefter of ESPN reports that Shaheed and the Seahawks are not close to an extension, and the expectation is that the two-time Pro Bowler will hit free agency. Shaheed has 153 receptions for 2,243 yards and 12 touchdowns in his four-year career to go along with three punt return touchdowns and a kickoff return touchdown. He ranks 13th on PFT’s top-100 free agents. https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/report-rashid-shaheed-appears-headed-to-free-agency
×
×
  • Create New...