Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Exclusive MW3 Gameplay...thread..


Awesomeness!!

Recommended Posts

ARE YOU SERIOUS???? We finally get an urban setting??? After 5 years?? Well worth the wait. I hope all of you BC fanboys have fun fighting the Russians in the Jungle again...I'm sure that will be a blast....nothing will touch being able to fight in downtown New York...if Homefront had that environment I would have bought it..WM3 will be EPIC..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fug is WM3? and have you seen the BF3 footage lololol you think this is better than that?

MW3 is just MW and MW2 with a slightly altered storyline...there's nothing great about the series anymore unfortunately. Enjoy playing your half assed game that isn't given the time it needs because the developers know the fanboys will eat it up either way....I'll be playing a game that actually deserves my money....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Battlefield Fanboys are hyping up BF3 to be something it isn't.

When the hype exceeds the quality of the product, your in for a major meltdown form the media and fanbase post release.

The urban setting in MW3 looks like it's gonna be a blast..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Battlefield Fanboys are hyping up BF3 to be something it isn't.

When the hype exceeds the quality of the product, your in for a major meltdown form the media and fanbase post release.

The urban setting in MW3 looks like it's gonna be a blast..

Nothing can match the undeserved hype that the CoD franchise has received....it hasn't been a complete game since Modern Warfare. CoD fanboys are fooling themselves if they think Battlefield isn't worth the hype...maybe on the consoles it might be lackluster but on it's true home it will easily be the best shooter this year. No urban Hollywood scripted fire fights will change the fact that Battlefield features 64 player online matches, a better graphics engine and WAY more attention to detail...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Battlefield Fanboys are hyping up BF3 to be something it isn't.

When the hype exceeds the quality of the product, your in for a major meltdown form the media and fanbase post release.

The urban setting in MW3 looks like it's gonna be a blast..

ohhhh SNAP!!! URABAN SETTINGS!!!!! yeah you have "urban settings" and we have jets, tanks, and countless other vehicles to go along with maps 10 times bigger than any cod map ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ohhhh SNAP!!! URABAN SETTINGS!!!!! yeah you have "urban settings" and we have jets, tanks, and countless other vehicles to go along with maps 10 times bigger than any cod map ever.

Not to mention actual bullets in the magazines....

mw3vsbf3.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing can match the undeserved hype that the CoD franchise has received....it hasn't been a complete game since Modern Warfare. CoD fanboys are fooling themselves if they think Battlefield isn't worth the hype...maybe on the consoles it might be lackluster but on it's true home it will easily be the best shooter this year. No urban Hollywood scripted fire fights will change the fact that Battlefield features 64 player online matches' date=' a better graphics engine and WAY more attention to detail...[/quote']

Give up the graphics war.

The Battlefield fanboys keep branding themselves as some elite tier of gamers while branding CoD players as some dribbling form of idiots who have never played another game, which is insanely ironic, considering anybody who puts graphics of all things as a factor in determining a good game clearly hasn't been playing video games very long.

When it comes down to it, more people will choose MW3 over BF3 simply because they enjoy it more.

It's more fluid, it's smoother, it has more epic moments which lead most to believe it's more fun.

A grand majority of the BF3 fanbase will choose BF3 simply because they want to place themselves on a pedestool and show how "different" they are.

I'll just have fun playing one of my favorite games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Many Panthers fans are already excited about second-round selection Nic Scourton for a variety of reasons including but not limited to: the Panthers needed to recharge the position group, Scourton had a late first-round grade according to many (including the Panthers), and he fit this season's modus operandi of stopping the run now and forever. However, Scourton was seen early on as one of the top-3 EDGE guys in this class but fell due to not having quite the season at Texas A&M as he did prior at Purdue (his sophomore season). It's been revealed since then a few different things that speak to that dip in production... Texas A&M, for one, requires each player on their line to be able to hold two gaps. This also explains why we saw low production across the board from the other two TA&M prospects but were still being heavily touted. Scourton was also said to have bulked up to 280lbs in order to fulfill this role and noticeably suffered from it. He's expected to play this season with Carolina at 255 - 260 which is very different from most situations. In most situations, teams are wanting players to gain 15 - 30. Since Scourton is going to be playing at his Purdue weight, I thought it would make sense to dive more into that tape. Y'all... we might have gotten something special... Let's take a quick peek at the stats before we start drooling over some highlights. First, a summary of the last two seasons for Scourton: Second, the game splits: The first thing that pops up for me is how Scourton's sack numbers were cut in half his senior year. We've already pointed out issues with scheme that impacted the TA&M linemen from racking up numbers, but seeing the game splits it's clear that Scourton didn't exactly feast on inferior competition while at Purdue. He had two two-sack games (vs. Michigan (2023 - 2024 champs), Indiana) and a 10-tackle game (vs. Nebraska). I also see the 2024 games where he went up against two top-10 tackles (Will Campbell from LSU + Armand Membou from Missouri) that I watched leading up to the draft.  For those who just want a summary: Scourton looked elite at Purdue and is going to be rotating in often during his rookie campaign. I originally had him penciled in as the second-string, strong-side edge defender behind Clowney but I wouldn't be surprised to see the team have him and Pat Jones II moving around when they rotate in in order to find where Nic looks best. Here's a highlight reel to replace that Cialias you lost in your recliner tonight:   For those that like to use their own eyes: Below I'll be linking the linking the five games I've mentioned above. If you plan to watch all of them, I highly recommend going in the order listed as that will allow you to see him vs. Campbell and then Membou while dealing with the aforementioned things he dealt with at Texas A&M before seeing him look unstoppable in 2023 when he was allowed to play both at a comfortable weight and in a scheme that didn't require him two cover two gaps nearly every play. vs. Will Campbell (2024) vs. Armand Membou (2024) vs. Nebraska (2023) vs. Michigan (2023)   vs. Indiana (2023)  
    • Yea, i honestly think he had almost as much say as Dan.  One of the main reasons I think that is Eager has said before he was ever with the Panthers, that you trade away picks for a qb and for any other position you do pick swaps, and that's exactly what we did.
    • For a LB that is a long career.  They take a beating.  Shoulders and head.  My favorite LB of All Time--Junior Seau--had a 20-year career--the average career for a STARTING MLB is 5.6 years.  I really think Shaq is done, but if he can play, it does not mean that he should.   Think about Morgan's career--7 seasons.  Luke's career--8 seasons.  Beason played only 93 games over 10 years--only 5 seasons where he played 15 games or more.  The other 5 seasons?  No more than 5 games per.  So basically, the average starting MLB plays 90 games in his career.  Shaq has played 123 games and was pretty injury free until the last 2 seasons (6 games total). 
×
×
  • Create New...