Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hangartner likely moving elsewhere to start


Gscottnc5

Recommended Posts

The money difference between starter's salaries and back up's money is just too great not to give it a shot. Six years is a long career for a back up lineman, but 10-11 for a starter isn't that unheard of.

And the problem with being a backup lineman, no matter how versatile you are is that you are a cog that can be changed out for someone younger and cheaper as soon as the cap space gets tight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny thing, if you look at the bills board they are whining 'if he is so good, why wasn't he a full time starter here'. Maybe they don't deserve him.

:lol: Just tell them he's not good enough to start here, but plenty good enough to start there, that should shut them up... :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol: Just tell them he's not good enough to start here, but plenty good enough to start there, that should shut them up... :lol:

That's the thing...he WAS good enough to start, and he did! Just when the starters got injured. It's not a knock on him...he was THE backup. Like the 6th man in basketball...even though you don't start, your still a vital part of the team, and will get to start here and there. I'd love to see him back because of his ability to play multiple positions on the line. But I think some team (and I'm still going with Buffalo) is going to throw WAY more money than the Panthers will be willing to throw at him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would heavily push back on the notion of Tomlin and Cowher inheriting "collapsed teams." From 1980 to 1991(prior to Cowher and after their Super Bowl victories) the Steelers experienced just 4 sub .500 seasons. In fact the winning percentage for those years was 0.505. At most that was relatively mediocre, something fairly akin to the pre-Tepper Panthers. From Cowher through Tomlin(1992 to Present) it has been the NFL's best franchise. 22 playoff appearances, 4 Super Bowl Appearances, 2 Titles, 15 times winning the division. In fact they have only experienced 3 sub .500 records in that 34 season span.  That isn't ever a scenario where rebuilding happens. It's constant and consistent retooling so that your franchise floor is always high. It's smart business decisions, exceptional drafting and quality personnel moves that create a situation where that floor STAYS high.  It was precisely BECAUSE we opted to go through a complete teardown and "rebuild" without any of that competence being in the organization at all that led us to where we are currently. A situation that will more than likely continue for well over a decade longer.  Long term successful franchises do not "rebuild." They are in a constant state of competent flux that sustains them through some leaner periods without ripping the foundation completely out that led to that success in the first place. 
    • Houston's OL sucks but Stroud has also definitely regressed. Similar story to Jayden Daniels in Washington. Both guys looked like future MVPs as rookies but sustaining success in the NFL at QB is hard. The more tape there is on you for opposing DCs to study the harder it gets.
    • So I was curious and remember seeing a tweet but here are Young’s numbers vs Strouds number since that time  Stroud since week 3 2025. Bryce since coming back off the bench and playing in Denver 
×
×
  • Create New...