Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Wide out that should come to Carolina.Who's with me?


Recommended Posts

Braylon Edwards.

Season Team G Rec Yds Y/G Avg Lng YAC 1stD TD Fum FumL

2005-06 Clev 10 32 512 51.2 16.0 80 6.3 22 3

2006-07 Clev 16 61 884 55.3 14.5 75 5.3 38 6

2007-08 Clev 16 80 1289 80.6 16.1 78 3.9 57 16 3 2

2008-09 Clev 16 55 873 54.6 15.9 70 4.1 42 3

2009-10 Clev 4 10 139 34.8 13.9 24 2.9 10 0

2009-10 NYJ 12 35 541 45.1 15.5 65 4.5 27 4 1 1

2010-11 NYJ 16 53 904 56.5 17.1 74 5.7 40 7 1 1

Career 90 326 5142 57.1 15.8 80 4.8 236 39 5 4

One phenomenal year where he was under coach Chudz (Chudz ties!). Then some good to average years. He's not Injury prone and has played all his games since 06-07. He doesn't fumble often. He did have that one year he dropped balls thrown at him a lot. But he's gotten better since then. Yes he had the off field issues, DWI. But I don't think that would be a problem with the new Regime. He's not that old, only 28. He probably has 5-6 years left in him, maybe more. With Smitty on the other side, the defense would have to respect Edwards and not double team smith. Then the Emergence and development of LaFell and Gettis. Add the Tight End Element, Shockey, Barnidge, Rosario (if he's resigned). I see a potent offense. We already have the running game. As far as how much it would cost to get his services, that right there would be the million dollar question. Literally. How many millions would it take for him to come to Carolina? How many teams would be in a bidding war for him if any? With Santonio Holmes, James Jones, Sidney Rice, Plaxico Burress, Randy Moss, Terrell Owens out there in free agency. I don't know if other teams will look at other wide outs before taking a look at Edwards. Some teams might be turned off by his off field issues? That could help the cause to bring him here since that's not a problem with this regime, See Brandon Hogan. In the end if we sign him to a big contract for 5-6 years, I'd be ecstatic. I think he's a top notch guy. That's my .02 on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pass.

Edwards is too inconsistent and has too many off the field issues. Plus when he was in Cleveland all he ever wanted was to be with a big market team, so I don't see him leaving New York to come to Carolina.

Dallas, Philly or New England? Yeah.

Carolina? Doubt it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best wide receiver for the Panthers is already here, Steve Smith. If he wants out, then we definitely need a starter and Edwards can be that. Other free agents include Rice, Jackson, Holmes, Floyd, and the other Steve Smith. I don't know whether we could get one of them. I like the idea of trading Steve Smith for Vincent Jackson unless Jackson would be disgruntled (we don't need more of that).

If we lose Smitty we have to upgrade the position with at least 1 starter. I like the idea of bringing in a guy and trying to keep Smitty. Unless Guy or Wright can come on and compete for playing time, we can't count of what we have. We have to look outside. At long as we find a proven vet, I will be fine. We just need to keep up what we started when we signed Shockey and then drafted Newton by fixing the offense by upgrading and adding to the wide receiver corps as well as signing Williams and Kalil to new contracts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am satisified with Smith, LaFell and Gettis.

I don't think and overpriced guy really needs to come here.

I think it will just hinder the progress of one of our young recievers.

I don't feel like bringing in Dyson and Proehl hurt Smiths development. And Proehl made some huge plays for this team. Depth isn't a bad thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't feel like bringing in Dyson and Proehl hurt Smiths development. And Proehl made some huge plays for this team. Depth isn't a bad thing.

I just think that more than three is too much.

Yes depth is great, but someone will be seeing a lot of pine time.

I just would like to see LaFell and Gettis really stand out.

I just fear that it would be hard to do behind Edwards of Holmes etc..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just think that more than three is too much.

Yes depth is great, but someone will be seeing a lot of pine time.

I just would like to see LaFell and Gettis really stand out.

I just fear that it would be hard to do behind Edwards of Holmes etc..

More than fair, but I would be scared that we are walking into next year putting too much pressure on the development of two young receivers (ala Colbert and Carter). I would rather overspend at the position and deal with a overpaid player than go into a season where we don't surround a possible franchise quarterback with enough talent to succeed. If the young guys have talent, they will play and contribute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...