Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WTH, You can't wear a dress to school?


charlotte49er

Recommended Posts

What's this world coming too?

Maybe it was the high heels. From the picture, it's looks like he coordinated well.

Maybe the Principal was a female and she was jealous. :smilielol5:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43445423/ns/local_news-seattle_wa/?gt1=43001

Boy%20in%20heels.grid-4x2.jpg

Boy wears dress and heels to school, gets suspended

PORT ORCHARD, Wash.A 15-year-old boy has been suspended from school after wearing high heels and a dress to school as a part of a challenge laid down by his mother.

Sam Saurs, a ninth grader at Sedgwick Junior High School in Port Orchard, said he told his mother that wearing high heels wouldn't be that hard. Saurs' mother challenged him to try it and he accepted. To take it even further, he decided to wear a dress, too.

After Saurs showed up at school Wednesday in the dress and heels, the school suspended him for the remainder of the year. That suspension was later reduced to three days. But Saurs won't be allowed to go to the ninth grade dance or the class party at Wild Waves.

The South Kitsap School District said the issue has been resolved and would not make any further comment about the incident.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the people I've ever met from Port Orchard are serious weirdos. One gave herself a full sleeve of tattoos when she was 13. Yes.... did it herself. Another guy I know compulsively stops people on busy crosswalks with the old "excuse me, did you drop something?" routine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was suspended for causing a disturbance. Can you imagine the uproar that would have happened if some weird fugg walked into NINTH grade wearing a dress and heels. It would be damn impossible to do anything that day. It was probably for his own saftey too...every kid in school was gonna try and make dude cry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was suspended for causing a disturbance. Can you imagine the uproar that would have happened if some weird fugg walked into NINTH grade wearing a dress and heels. It would be damn impossible to do anything that day. It was probably for his own saftey too...every kid in school was gonna try and make dude cry.

You have a point when it comes to sending him home for the day, but there was no reason to bar him from class activities later in the year for this unless he was aware that this would happen if he wore the dress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have a point when it comes to sending him home for the day, but there was no reason to bar him from class activities later in the year for this unless he was aware that this would happen if he wore the dress.

Schools can't prohibit you from "expressing yourself" so theoretically you could wear a dress to school, or a swastika, or anything if you want. But they can suspend you for disrupting school. Wearing a dress or wearing or swastika or things like that will cause a disruption in the school and he probably got suspended for like 3 or 5 days since the school year was probably close to being over wherever he is it just made the story worse to say he was suspended "for the year." And when you're suspended you can't participate in any school activities so you can't go to dances, sports events or field trips.

The kid wore the dress to get attention. His mom bet him he couldn't wear heels, he could have worn the heels on the weekend to the mall or whatever the poo he does, but he chose to wear them to school where he knew they would cause a commotion. And he didn't just stop at the heels he through on a full dress. This kid was just being a douche, and not he's not only a douche but he's gonna be a douche thats laughed at for the next three year...and still can't go to wild waves...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...