Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Revised timeline for next week


MHS831

Recommended Posts

Hopefully, this is the info you (like me) really want to know. Condensed from ESPN article. If this is embedded in other threads please accept my most sincere apologies for the tremendous inconvenience reading this must have caused.

Per ESPN

Timeline:

The NFL's 130-day labor dispute is set to end after an agreement on the remaining points was reached for a 10-year deal.

Sources say the NFL Players Association's executive committee plans to vote on a collective bargaining agreement Monday, followed by votes from player representatives and eventually players league-wide.

The timeline, according to an ESPN.com source:

Monday: NFLPA's executive committee votes whether to recommend approval of the CBA approved by owners on Thursday. Then, a player rep from each of the 32 teams votes whether to recommend approval of the CBA.

Wednesday: Players from some teams report to facilities and vote whether to recertify the NFLPA as a union and accept the proposed CBA.

If the NFLPA has gotten the necessary votes, teams can also start contract talks with their own players, including free agents and draft choices.

Friday: The remaining players report and vote whether to approve recertification and the CBA. If the NFLPA then receives the necessary 50-percent-plus-one-vote majority in approval, then it recertifies as a union.

Saturday: Free agency starts and teams can officially sign players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hope that squirrel doesn't lock your thread because it's better than his....

If he does, he'll more than likely put a link in to his though.

This definitely deserves it's own thread.

The "Madatory" one sucks and all the real info is lost in garbage posts by people who don't understand anything whatsoever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hope that squirrel doesn't lock your thread because it's better than his....

If he does, he'll more than likely put a link in to his though.

This definitely deserves it's own thread.

The "Madatory" one sucks and all the real info is lost in garbage posts by people who don't understand anything whatsoever.

Yes, I think it needs to be separated from everything else. Thanks. I did not see Squirrel's info but i figured it was out there somewhere--I don't care about credit or even reading something posted elsewhere if it is not obvious. Some people read everything that is posted, some (me) survey the thread titles and move on. It takes time to develop a knowledge of every topic covered--not interested in spending 20 minutes researching something to avoid inconveniencing some jerk for 20 seconds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I think it needs to be separated from everything else. Thanks. I did not see Squirrel's info but i figured it was out there somewhere--I don't care about credit or even reading something posted elsewhere if it is not obvious. Some people read everything that is posted, some (me) survey the thread titles and move on. It takes time to develop a knowledge of every topic covered--not interested in spending 20 minutes researching something to avoid inconveniencing some jerk for 20 seconds.

Which is exactly why I created 3 separate threads the other day...

1- owners voted and news that went along with that vote

2- goodell's press conference where He said the lockout was over with

3- the possibility of a hold out

Apparently I love creating threads about the same thing though..?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which is exactly why I created 3 separate threads the other day...

1- owners voted and news that went along with that vote

2- goodell's press conference where He said the lockout was over with

3- the possibility of a hold out

Apparently I love creating threads about the same thing though..?

You do...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hope that squirrel doesn't lock your thread because it's better than his....

If he does, he'll more than likely put a link in to his though.

This definitely deserves it's own thread.

The "Madatory" one sucks and all the real info is lost in garbage posts by people who don't understand anything whatsoever.

Mod bashing hmm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...