Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jets aren't going to re-sign Braylon Edwards

uncfan888

By uncfan888,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

uncfan888 Grand Master

uncfan888

Posted
Posted

Sorry if this has been posted already.... I haven't been on here much lately

I think we should go after him... even with the weapons we've signed, it would be great to have a reliable #2 receiver.

Smith and Him on the wings, 2 TE set with shockey and olsen, D-Will or Stewart in the backfield....

even our QB's should be able to find an open guy with that

Link to comment
Share on other sites
therealmjl Grand Master

therealmjl

Posted
Posted

Sorry if this has been posted already.... I haven't been on here much lately

I think we should go after him... even with the weapons we've signed, it would be great to have a reliable #2 receiver.

Smith and Him on the wings, 2 TE set with shockey and olsen, D-Will or Stewart in the backfield....

even Jimmy Clausen should be able to find an open guy with that

I think Cam should do alright with what we have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
riddel Newbie

riddel

Posted
Posted

I want the guy...not just because I have him and Smith on my Madden team either.

I don't see us picking up a WR. I think they are going to try and develop the guys we have. Plus, we really need to spend some money on a CB or two...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ThePantherDude Newbie

ThePantherDude

Posted
Posted

I'm still not sure why people want a WR. We have a plethora of young guys who need to get on the field. Gettis, Lafell, Edwards, the WR from Hawaii (I can't think of his damn name), plus with our new TEs it should spread the field for our young guys even more helping them develop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HeatCheck Newbie

HeatCheck

Posted
Posted

B.Edwards is a great WR without hands.

I think he has gotten over the drops. That was a knock on him in Cleveland but he seems to be doing better on that part.

If you watched him last yer with the Jets he was significantly better about not dropping balls. I really don't think he dropped that many. (EDIT: just checked, dropped passes - Holmes: 5 Edwards: 2)

But I'd rather go after a CB, DT before going after a WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

i would love it, but i would rather wait until we have at least a starting caliber CB brought in.

i really can't imagine edwards (or any top end WR) being happy to come here considering how sparse the targets are going to be. that ball is going to be spread around an awful lot and anyone coming here would be aware of that. the first couple years of having a young QB like cam is going to make those targets even more rare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

B.Edwards is a great WR without hands.

meh...he's actually gotten a lot better over the past few years as far as drops are concerned. the dude earned that rep a few years back honestly, but he's gone a long way in turning it around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
uncfan888 Grand Master

uncfan888

Posted
  • Author
Posted

We have more pressing needs than a proven num 2 receiver. Not to mention, IMO, the Greg Olsen acquisition was pretty much the same thing as getting a #2 reciever

that's very true. I definitely think he'll have the second most receptions after Smith this year. That was a great trade for us.. definitely worth a 3rd round pick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Week 6 PFF grades vs. DAL

      By TD alt · Posted

      I don't believe it's as easy as saying that anyone believes that Rico had the 10th best day on offense. Grades are done in a vacuum inasmuch as they can be. By their very nature, skill positions are always going to account for more "production" in reference to stats, and RBs perhaps even more than WRs because they touch the ball more. You can't look at PFF's grading system, or any football grading/grading system (like perhaps Football Outsiders or Next Gen Stats), so simplistically. If a player has an excellent day, relative to his position, relative to his assignments, and relative to his number of snaps, then he should be graded highly. It's up to the reader (or the analyst, if you will) to put what you're seeing into context, and that's not only in relation to the grades, but the general situation (like whether a player is playing injured, who they're playing with or against---the general situation). Even the fact that (presumably) PFF or news outlets put out a list of the highest and lowest grades, that doesn't mean that said players were the most impactful of the day, it just means that they did or didn't do their job the best, based upon a certain set of parameters. PFF is a part of life for football analysts, talking heads, execs, coaches, players, and even fans (even if indirectly), all to varying degrees. It is a tool that is used by all 32 teams. Obviously it's not viewed so dismissively by franchises as a whole. Execs obviously don't look at it as a bunch of bozos making sh¡t up on the fly. Fans can berate it or swear by it, but it isn't going anywhere.  The only thing that I can tell you is that perspective and context matters.
    • csx
      Mitchell Evans

      By csx · Posted

      Im not big in to PFF but their guys were raving about his blocking along with our other skill players in the run game. https://youtu.be/D4kL_N97cFQ?si=sJWSZCUA1bj5otyx  
    • Basbear
      Can we get to 9-8?

      By Basbear · Posted

×
×
  • Create New...