Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The reality of Clausen's good night


CRA

Recommended Posts

Yeah, I keep reading "Clausen looks good!". People must have been watching a Notre Dame highlight video.

Did he look better than last year? Marginally.

Considering he's the worst QB we've ever had, a marginal improvement isn't a good improvement.

Jeff Lewis, anyone? He's a guy we had before Newton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If everyone else goes on record as well, I'd be more than happy to whip something up, although I don't think I'd be close either way.

See, the impression that people here have of you is that you bash Cam no matter what he does, just like you accuse others of praising him no matter what he does. I'm just curious to know what you would consider a "good performance" from him to be? If he completes 60% with 1td 0int against Miami will you come on here and say, "oh, maybe I was wrong about this guy"? What if he completes 75% with 2td and 0int? Or does he have to do it for multiple games? A whole season? I saw an offense that looked a lot more capable of making big plays Saturday night than it did at any point last season, that's the basis for my being excited about his performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw an offense that looked a lot more capable of making big plays Saturday night than it did at any point last season, that's the basis for my being excited about his performance.

this is correct. i dont give a damn about his overall stats, only how well the team moves the ball. he has a major influence on every aspect of the offense, even a direct handoff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I keep reading "Clausen looks good!". People must have been watching a Notre Dame highlight video.

Did he look better than last year? Marginally.

Considering he's the worst QB we've ever had, a marginal improvement isn't a good improvement.

Jesus Christ, when did you start watching the Panthers?

Randy fuging Fasani, and it isn't even bloody close!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See, the impression that people here have of you is that you bash Cam no matter what he does, just like you accuse others of praising him no matter what he does. I'm just curious to know what you would consider a "good performance" from him to be? If he completes 60% with 1td 0int against Miami will you come on here and say, "oh, maybe I was wrong about this guy"? What if he completes 75% with 2td and 0int? Or does he have to do it for multiple games? A whole season? I saw an offense that looked a lot more capable of making big plays Saturday night than it did at any point last season, that's the basis for my being excited about his performance.

Stats don't matter to me, not once did I quote his completion percentage as evidence of his lack of accuracy. I talked about what I saw on each play adn my reasoning for saying it was a good/bad throw.

I couldn't have given Cam higher praise for that ball that Armanti dropped. It was perfect. Perfect drop, perfect plant, perfect throw. fuging beautiful.

Problem is, it was the only pass that was close to that. Back foot here, back foot there, bouncer here, sail one there.

I'd be more than willing to give him credit when he deserves it, but I won't let myself be blinded by "hope" and use that to draw my conclusions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just for fun I have been looking at other rookie performances in their first preseason game.

Mark Sanchez's first pass ever was a 48 yd bomb for a TD. His target? None other than our own David Clowney.

There is your fun fact for today.

Here is your second fun fact of the day.

Mark Sanchez's first pass of his second season was a pick six.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
    • I parked in this lot a few times. It would take over and hour to get out of that lot after games. Never again
×
×
  • Create New...