Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Other possibilities for Lucas?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure what you guys are smoking, but Lucas isn't going anywhere unless we are lucky enough to find a lock-down cornerback in the draft and I don't think that will happen...

You don't think a bridge has been burned?

Plus how are we going to get an additional 5-7 million of cap space to sign a free agent or two and our draft picks? (I'm assuming Peppers stays).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what you guys are smoking, but Lucas isn't going anywhere unless we are lucky enough to find a lock-down cornerback in the draft and I don't think that will happen...

true...even if we do trade peppers and get a 1st round pick we ain't gunna use it on a CB we'd use it on a DE....but somthin else to think about is we could use our 2nd rounder on a CB so we should just go ahead and trade lucas since he played like a rookie last year and we would free up some cap space

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know I know. But it's fun to make fun.

Ken "toast" Lucas is a liability

Yeah, just having fun, you know he's gonna still be here or they would have redone him for space...

You don't think a bridge has been burned?

Plus how are we going to get an additional 5-7 million of cap space to sign a free agent or two and our draft picks? (I'm assuming Peppers stays).

Let's just say it, they haven't and I don't think they will...

true...even if we do trade peppers and get a 1st round pick we ain't gunna use it on a CB we'd use it on a DE....but somthin else to think about is we could use our 2nd rounder on a CB so we should just go ahead and trade lucas since he played like a rookie last year and we would free up some cap space

And yet here he is. I can't see why people don't get this, the man is locked unless we buy a shut-down CB in the draft and it's not likely to happen. I know he's expensive, but he's signed and we haven't dealt him/released him renegotiated him...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know I know. But it's fun to make fun.

Seriously...not poking....why is it fun? I will never get the mentality behind namecalling/smacktalking your own team's players outside of their doing criminal things, or taking advantage of people or something like that. And no I don't mean saying a guy isn't a good player or they had a bad season or a bad game...I mean personal type stuff or pejorative names. Yeah I know it's a board and people aren't talking TO the person but I don't get it. You sure didn't react well to being called a troll by someone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously...not poking....why is it fun? I will never get the mentality behind namecalling/smacktalking your own team's players outside of their doing criminal things, or taking advantage of people or something like that. And no I don't mean saying a guy isn't a good player or they had a bad season or a bad game...I mean personal type stuff or pejorative names. Yeah I know it's a board and people aren't talking TO the person but I don't get it. You sure didn't react well to being called a troll by someone.

He is getting old and getting burnt. I don't think any team will want him outside of those that he "won't go to".

I wish they had dealt him to Detroit. He blocked it. I believe at that point bridges were burnt and now he is subject to ridicule as far as I can see.

Just because he is on my team that does not make him a good player.

and as far as the "troll" comment. I really did not mind I just wanted to point out that london had no clue what he was talking about because he used the word incorrectly. Plus I don't get paid millions of dollars a year to do a good job for 16 games and give the fans of my team top production like he does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously...not poking....why is it fun? I will never get the mentality behind namecalling/smacktalking your own team's players outside of their doing criminal things, or taking advantage of people or something like that. And no I don't mean saying a guy isn't a good player or they had a bad season or a bad game...I mean personal type stuff or pejorative names. Yeah I know it's a board and people aren't talking TO the person but I don't get it. You sure didn't react well to being called a troll by someone.

If you're coming to my aid, don't bother, though thanks. CRolls and I get each other and neither is upset with what the other says. If you weren't, of course, carry on...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because he is on my team that does not make him a good player.

Yeah I get that, thinking everyone on your team is OMGZWTFBBQ THABESTESTEVA!!!! is homerism. It's why I made a distinction between critiquing a guy's play vs. namecalling in my original query.

and as far as the "troll" comment. I really did not mind I just wanted to point out that london had no clue what he was talking about because he used the word incorrectly. Plus I don't get paid millions of dollars a year to do a good job for 16 games and give the fans of my team top production like he does.

Well perhaps that is simply your posting style, but I got the impression you were a bit pissed/offended. If you were not, then I was incorrect.

Honestly, I don't think what a guy gets paid to do their job is reason to smacktalk them, but to each his own. The Lucas comment of yours in particular wasn't really the type of thing I was referring to anyway, but it made me think of asking about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I get that, thinking everyone on your team is OMGZWTFBBQ THABESTESTEVA!!!! is homerism. It's why I made a distinction between critiquing a guy's play vs. namecalling in my original query.

Well perhaps that is simply your posting style, but I got the impression you were a bit pissed/offended. If you were not, then I was incorrect.

Honestly, I don't think what a guy gets paid to do their job is reason to smacktalk them, but to each his own. The Lucas comment of yours in particular wasn't really the type of thing I was referring to anyway, but it made me think of asking about it.

fair enough.

I am never gonna get offended by anything I read on a message board and I will never try to offend anyone else.

And I have nothing personally against any Panther player...I just don't pull any punches and live by the "you're in the spotlight, deal with it" rule a little too liberally at times.

I would love nothing more than to see KL come back and play lights out, just like I would for Jake. I just don't have any faith that it can happen.

My posting style can be a bit childish at times so I admit that out here on the carpet but I really don't see the point of doing it at all if I constantly curb what my initial thoughts are in effort to sound more polished/refined/mature/vanilla.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about Peppers and Lucas to the Phins for their first this year and next year...Its like giving them Lucas for FREE@!!!

But on a serious note..

Do it..

that would be fine with me. id trade the first next year for there second or maybe even there third this year....but maybe thats why im not the one making these decisions lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
    • Especially since we’re neck and neck with them for the play in
×
×
  • Create New...