Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gerrad Warren DT Cut


PantherBrew

Recommended Posts

Again from Pats, but he will not go home waivers.

Sorry, I know this is unlikely but he is 6'5" 330 and is exactly what we could use.

If we could make it worth his while financially then it could sway him, however most think he will be back with Pats.

caplannfl Adam Caplan

Pats cut DT Gerard Warren to make room for TE Dan Gronkowski. Warren could be back after week 1.

98hxlh.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd forgotten he was still in the league, honestly.

I remember when he was drafted by the Browns. Kinda long in the tooth, but you could take the track that a little age and wisdom could be useful given how young the other guys are.

He actually had 3.5 sacks last season, from the DT spot thats a pretty solid interior push.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd forgotten he was still in the league, honestly.

I remember when he was drafted by the Browns. Kinda long in the tooth, but you could take the track that a little age and wisdom could be useful given how young the other guys are.

Guys like Buckner prove that older DTs can still be servicable. He's not a long term solution (or even better than mediocre), but if the best we can hope for right now is a stop-gap, you could do a lot worse than Gerrard Warren.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His last year in Cleveland was Chudzinski's first. Fred Graves was on staff that year too (wrong side of the ball, obviously).

And Rivera would have some level of familiarity from his AFC West days. So would Matsko, who would have coached offensive linemen that faced him while with the Chiefs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is the best reason for drafting a T--Moton's knee is also a big concern for me--I am not sure if it is still justified, but leg injuries for big men can be degenerative.  I have argued against it--I think Morgan will think it has been addressed and will draft a Late-round OT with upside.  Forsythe?  What the hell was that?  I am leaning WR (guessing what they might do) because they really don't have a Z WR, based on Cosell's description of the position. TE is in play.  DT is in play.  The thing I am most confident about?  LB in round 2.
    • I think they wanted to dispell the rumors of his work ethic, but that is speculation.  Interesting point.  I am thinking (right now) that they might go WR again.  
    • Personally, I have argued that the pick is probably unlikely to be an OT in an effort to read the tea leaves, but I am an OL fanatic and would get it. By now, they probably have info about Ickey and I think the decision will be based on the likelihood of his return to form by 2027.   Thanks to Cosell, I am more inclined to lean towards the Z WR and Concepcion or Cooper.  After he explained it, I felt that it is a need.   DT could easily be the pick.  Who did we get to replace Robinson?  I think any GM looks to upgrade a position, not simply replace.  That would suggest an early draft pick, maybe? I am not happy about having Scott back.  Please tell me that was a depth move.   When it comes to TE, I pray we don't love Sadiq.   I doubt it is a CB, C, or Edge, but if an elite CB or Edge fell to us....(to your point). I think we could try to trade back if there is a market.  
×
×
  • Create New...