Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gerrad Warren DT Cut


PantherBrew

Recommended Posts

Again from Pats, but he will not go home waivers.

Sorry, I know this is unlikely but he is 6'5" 330 and is exactly what we could use.

If we could make it worth his while financially then it could sway him, however most think he will be back with Pats.

caplannfl Adam Caplan

Pats cut DT Gerard Warren to make room for TE Dan Gronkowski. Warren could be back after week 1.

98hxlh.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd forgotten he was still in the league, honestly.

I remember when he was drafted by the Browns. Kinda long in the tooth, but you could take the track that a little age and wisdom could be useful given how young the other guys are.

He actually had 3.5 sacks last season, from the DT spot thats a pretty solid interior push.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd forgotten he was still in the league, honestly.

I remember when he was drafted by the Browns. Kinda long in the tooth, but you could take the track that a little age and wisdom could be useful given how young the other guys are.

Guys like Buckner prove that older DTs can still be servicable. He's not a long term solution (or even better than mediocre), but if the best we can hope for right now is a stop-gap, you could do a lot worse than Gerrard Warren.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His last year in Cleveland was Chudzinski's first. Fred Graves was on staff that year too (wrong side of the ball, obviously).

And Rivera would have some level of familiarity from his AFC West days. So would Matsko, who would have coached offensive linemen that faced him while with the Chiefs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't necessarily think he will be moved, I would currently be leaning against that notion. I think a lot will depend on the coaching situation. Carroll certainly can't be thinking about wanting to go through a serious strip down and overhaul, so the longer he plans to remain, the less likely I think Crosby gets moved.
    • I think everyone says Mike Evans because of size, but really they have different strengths and play styles.  Tmac is better on intermediate routes and not nearly as good at contested catches. 
    • At this point, it is criminal to go into the 2026 training camp/OTA's with XL penciled in as a #2 WR. The team must upgrade, either through free agency or the draft. If he cannot give 100% effort on significantly less snaps as a #4-6 WR(players like Tremayne have done that consistently) then I don't think you have a player worth rostering beyond the trade deadline. Offensively, we eventually have to upgrade to an NFL starting caliber C. It's been almost the length of time from Gross to Ikey since Kalil retired and we have below average to terrible C play. Love Mays as a BC-esque utility backup but he will never be an above average long term starting C.  The TE room is one of the worst in the NFL but it's a low usage position in this offense, so the investments are likely to be small, if any. I would never expect to see an elite TE in a Dave Canales offense. 100% agree on OL depth. We actually aren't bad there but BC will be gone, Mays is a UFA, Corbett is a UFA and Zavala has been both injured and bad. We have to bolster that depth again or resign guys like Mays and Corbett to keep that depth somewhat stable.
×
×
  • Create New...