Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Iron Man 2 cast set

Murph

By Murph,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Jangler Newbie

Jangler

Posted
Posted

I hope her costume is really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really tight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Link Newbie

The Link

Posted
Posted

I hope her costume is really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really tight.

I hope she is just completely naked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
charlotte49er Newbie

charlotte49er

Posted
Posted

I just watched Iron Man (1) on DVD. (I know, I'm behind the times.) I was never a big fan of the comics growing up either. HUGH Thor, Capt America fan and to a lessor extent Superman.

WOW!!!

I was never a big fan of Gwyneth Paltrow, (too skiny of my tastes) but seeing her in IR and the red hair, drool! (I am so hot over red heads!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
shinner Newbie

shinner

Posted
Posted

I hope she is just completely naked.

I don't know who yer talking about but there is no way in hell that the movie will be R rated, and therefore, no bewbies ye shall peep. This ain't the 70s when PG movies routinely had bewbs here and there.

I was never a big fan of Gwyneth Paltrow, (too skiny of my tastes) but seeing her in IR and the red hair, drool! (I am so hot over red heads!)

I didn't know who that was her but I thought she looked pretty good too...was surprised to see her name in the credits. Have never found her to be attractive before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dimbee Newbie

dimbee

Posted
Posted

I wonder if Rhodes will dawn the War machine suit in this one.

I'm kinda pissed off that they didn't renew Terrence Howard. He was perfect for the character- I was a big War Machine comic fan back in the day, and Howard was spot on, IMO. Chedle has big shoes to fill, IMO. Granted, he is a great actor, so I'm sure he'll do well, but I really liked Howard's style as the character

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Link Newbie

The Link

Posted
Posted

I don't know who yer talking about but there is no way in hell that the movie will be R rated, and therefore, no bewbies ye shall peep. This ain't the 70s when PG movies routinely had bewbs here and there.

I didn't know who that was her but I thought she looked pretty good too...was surprised to see her name in the credits. Have never found her to be attractive before.

I can dream...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raskle Contributor

Raskle

Posted
Posted

I'm kinda pissed off that they didn't renew Terrence Howard. He was perfect for the character- I was a big War Machine comic fan back in the day, and Howard was spot on, IMO. Chedle has big shoes to fill, IMO. Granted, he is a great actor, so I'm sure he'll do well, but I really liked Howard's style as the character
:iagree:

Although I do like Cheadle a lot, Howard did a great job with the character and am sad to see him not on this project. I wonder what happened...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bear Hands
      Brooks RB, Placed on PUP, Out for 2025

      By Bear Hands · Posted

      Per Adam Schefter: https://x.com/AdamSchefter/status/1920523706624823739 Expected, but just want to rub it in here.
    • MHS831
      Clowney released

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I try to keep up and project the roster with color-coded charts.  You can see priorities and gauge who has the best chance of making the roster--you can see the priorities as well.  Here, Yellow is a 2025 draft pick, green is an undrafted free agent, and orange is a free agent. The depth chart will obviously change and I am not sure about roles (positions in all cases), so that is not the real issue at this time, but yellows and oranges show how the team focused on which aspects of the defense:     In the front 5, there were 3 draft picks, 3 free agents (not including players we re-signed), and two undrafted players signed. In the back 6, there was 1 draft pick and 2 free agents (LB, S), and four undrafted free agents. The undrafted free agents are always long shots, but by identifying them, you can tell which longshots might make the roster.
    • PNW_PantherMan
      An honest look at Bryce Young

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The rise of analytics in sports goes back to the use of sabermetrics in baseball.  The ironic thing is that the whole point of Bill James work was to objectively figure out each players contribution to to a team's wins throughout the season.  This is possible in baseball because each at bat is essentially a 1v1 with an objective outcome.  Applying statistical averages also works a lot better with hundreds of plate appearances over 162 games a year. PFF grades plays subjectively, and then puts them into buckets.  They then create different statistics based on those buckets.  That's all well and good and I'm not saying it's useless.  But calling it analytics like it's some kind of objective science is a far cry from what is actually going on.
×
×
  • Create New...