Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Comparisson to Manning...


ItsNotGonnaBeAlright

Recommended Posts

We'll be hearing this to no end for the rest of the week. But let's dig into the numbers and try to be a little objective in regards to how awesomely Cam played today.

The 1997 Dolphins were 16th on defense, 25th on passing defense. The 1998 Dolphins improved to a sixth ranked passing D and a number three overall defense. The Arizona Cardinals were 29th in overall defense last year, with a 23rd ranked passing defense. It's not impossible that the Cards have pulled off the same kind of turnaround, but its unlikely. On to the stats.

Manning: 21/37, 302 yards 1 TD, 3 INT, Long of 42 yards, no rushes

Newton: 24/37, 422 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT, Long of 77 yards, 8 rushes for 18 yards, 1 TD

Comparing the defenses doesn't really negate the performance by either QB. This is something that I think you'll hear in the next week or so by people who try to downplay what Cam did today. He had 120 more yards passing, an extra passing TD, two less interceptions, and an 18 yard rushing performance with a TD added on for extra measure against a defense that is considerably less talented than the one Manning faced in his first game. All in all, completely understandable.

Also woth noting, both Manning and Newton lost their debuts, despite the record setting performances.

Might be worth looking at the other top tier QB's in their debuts, and comparing the defenses.

Just food for thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'll be hearing this to no end for the rest of the week. But let's dig into the numbers and try to be a little objective in regards to how awesomely Cam played today.

The 1997 Dolphins were 16th on defense, 25th on passing defense. The 1998 Dolphins improved to a sixth ranked passing D and a number three overall defense. The Arizona Cardinals were 29th in overall defense last year, with a 23rd ranked passing defense. It's not impossible that the Cards have pulled off the same kind of turnaround, but its unlikely. On to the stats.

Manning: 21/37, 302 yards 1 TD, 3 INT, Long of 42 yards, no rushes

Newton: 24/37, 422 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT, Long of 77 yards, 8 rushes for 18 yards, 1 TD

Comparing the defenses doesn't really negate the performance by either QB. This is something that I think you'll hear in the next week or so by people who try to downplay what Cam did today. He had 120 more yards passing, an extra passing TD, two less interceptions, and an 18 yard rushing performance with a TD added on for extra measure against a defense that is considerably less talented than the one Manning faced in his first game. All in all, completely understandable.

Also woth noting, both Manning and Newton lost their debuts, despite the record setting performances.

Might be worth looking at the other top tier QB's in their debuts, and comparing the defenses.

Just food for thought.

Cam also won the Manning award for QB...Must be some cosmic connection between these two QBs? One never knows.

The replacement for Peyton's legacy is being sorted. Those talking heads are already annointing Andrew Luck but maybe it might just be Cam, to their shagrin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Top five passers last year in their debuts with current teams, opposing defense rank in parenthases:

Phillip Rivers - 8/11, 108 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT, 3 rushes for 2 yards (18)....win

Peyton Manning - Covered

Drew Brees - 16/30, 170 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT, 3 rushes for -2 yards (22)....win

Matt Schaub - 16/22, 225 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT, 1 rush for -1 yards (14)....win

Eli Manning - 17/37, 162 yards, 1 TD, 2 INT, 1 rush for -1 yards (14)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This isn't directed at CRA or anyone in particular, but as someone who works with large datasets every day, it's funny how you can construe data to fit any particular narrative.  I mean this is just a hilarious tweet, a stat nobody has ever heard of, then some percentages with QB name. No numerator/denominator to provide context, no explanation of the formula, just another stathead loser with a mustache parroting whatever he wants.  So much of this stuff is worthless, especially in a sport like Football. 
    • 3rd straight openers of horrific football featuring Bryce.   and if the games weren't dated....I bet someone unfamiliar with Bryce/us  couldn't figure out which one was his rookie season just off the 3 openers. 
    • I've watched everybody that says TLaw outplay Bryce also completely ignore Nijman giving up immediate pressures and mistakes by other players on the offense. I have no attachment to Bryce. My attachment is to facts, and the facts are that he dealt with more than TLaw did. As a fellow Clemson fan, I've got a much softer spot in my heart for TLaw and the NCG he won his freshman year than I do Bryce and his rough two seasons to start his career in Carolina.  Have you gone back and watched the all-22 with the intent to figure out what was happening rather than sticking with your initial assessment? Give it a shot. It's much more rewarding than making up conspiracies to continue an agenda.
×
×
  • Create New...