Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

to all the football experts in the huddle


RiP_Fred Lane

Recommended Posts

i like many others said we should trade peppers for cassel in the beginning straight up. and waves of people rushed in to comment on how dumb i was and that anything less than multiple picks including a first was idiotic.......and now ironically we are reported to be in discussions with the pats for the same pick they recieved in return for cassel. yet another year goes by that we refuse to make any moves to aquire a good player at the qb position. we may be good next year hell we might be just as good as we were this year, but when it matters teams will stack the box and make us throw and delhomme cant do that he is our weak link and the reason we will not win a superbowl with this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its just frustrating to see us pass up on qb after qb. theres a reason we arent as consistent as the top teams (indy, pats, chargers) and thats quarterback play. instead of a guy who can win a game by himself if the burden falls on his shoulders we have delhomme who trys but just doesnt have the tools. i know our front office is still a little gun shy over kerry collins but come one dont cling to jake like he's freaking joe montana

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its just frustrating to see us pass up on qb after qb. theres a reason we arent as consistent as the top teams (indy, pats, chargers) and thats quarterback play. instead of a guy who can win a game by himself if the burden falls on his shoulders we have delhomme who trys but just doesnt have the tools. i know our front office is still a little gun shy over kerry collins but come one dont cling to jake like he's freaking joe montana

Which is why the guy as over 20 game tying or game winning drives....ummmmm hmmmmm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said it in the first thread you started, I'll say it again:

We don't run the shotgun spread formation most of the time. We didn't draft Otah, Stewart, Kalil, and switch Wharton to left guard because attempting thirty five passes a game is in the cards.

Seriously, if Cassel wound up here it would be Jeff Garcia in Cleveland all over again. He isn't a good fit for our offense.

Edit:

hahahahahahah you called the Chargers "consistent"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont think a Peppers for Cassel trade would have been bad at all.

HOWEVER- I think the REASON you did not see that happen is because the FO does not see the QB position as a need right now.

With the need on the Lines, both Offense and MORE SO defense, they have to be focused on that.

We will still have the same QB who got us to 12-4 and was a big part of winning us some of those games.

Its just needs Vs. wants right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We will see how good Cassell is in a different uniform. I think he was too much of a risk. But, I agree we continually overlook the QB position. You can throw whatver stats you want out there about Jake...hes not good enough. Jake is a manager and belongs with a team with a stellar defense, which we currently do not have

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bleacher Report trade and mock has us trading to 9 and picking SG Brayden Burries Charlotte Hornets recieve: Kyrie Irving and No. 9 pick Dallas Mavericks receive: LaMelo Ball, No. 14 pick and No. 18 pick The Hornets just finished their sixth season with Ball. It was only their second with a winning record, their sixth without a playoff trip and the sixth in which someone else paced them in win shares (Kon Knueppel this time around). While they'd surely like to keep building on their second-half momentum, maybe they're just unconvinced that Ball can lead a winning team. Maybe they credit that stretch run less to him and more to the addition of Knueppel, the ascension of Brandon Miller and some out-of-nowhere gains on the defensive end.   Charlotte should be dreaming big right now, and perhaps it believes a steadier hand at point guard is needed to realize that. Or maybe it feels it needs a little more time to bring everything together and thinks that task would be simpler without Ball's money on the books and with a top-10 pick in a loaded draft instead of two selections in the mid-teens.   Either way, this shakeup works. Short-term, a healthy Irving should be far easier to follow than Ball. You may not always know if Irving is playing, but you know what you'll get if he does: elite shotmaking, all-time handles, offensive ingenuity and the ability to work both on and off the ball. He could show this young roster what's required to win for a year or two (he has a $42.4 million player option for 2027-28) or even stick around longer if the partnership proves especially fruitful.   The Hornets also add a building block in Burries, who offers both plug-and-play polish and flashes of shot-creation that hint at star potential. In short, they could better their chances of winning both now and in the future while collecting both the best player in the trade and the highest draft pic
    • I'd hire him in a heartbeat. Hell if he wanted the job, I'd have Canales packing his poo right now and I don't dislike Canales. It's just that firing a 106-58 coach is crazy work. That's a 65% winning percentage. That's the equivalent of averaging 11 wins a season. That's incomprehensible for a fanbase That's never experienced back to back winning seaons.
×
×
  • Create New...