Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why I hate this matchup w/ Chicago


CRA

Recommended Posts

Carolina Panthers pass D

They have given up 5 passing TDs in 3 games. Only 2 of those games did they face a legit threat in the passing game.

84, 70, 49, 48, and a 36 yd TD pass. If you are a Mike Martz offense, this on paper looks like the exact type of matchup you want to get your team back on track. Carolina isn't just giving up pass plays, they are giving up HUGE ones.

Chicago Bears D scheme

It was painfully obvious week 3 Cam hit a stumbling block (it happens w/ rookies). Was it just a random bad day or was it the rookie struggling w/ something specific. Weeks 1 and 2 he faced aggressive schemes that as a result gave him lots of 1 on 1 coverage downfield. Against the Jags he was off early and often. Jags didn't give him those looks b/c they play 2 deep safties at a high rate......just like Chicago. So if a team dictates that they don't want to allow Carolina to pick up there "chunks" of yards w/ the deep vertical........can we move the ball consistantly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, cover-2 is designed to take away the deep throws... but it is weak up the middle and on short/intermediate throws to the sidelines so we need to take full advantage of those two pass catching TE's we have on Sunday. It lines up perfectly with Olsen's desire to show Chicago that they made a mistake when they traded him away.

If we can hurt them with our TE's and/or run the ball effectively, it will force them to drop one of those safeties down and then we can hit them over the top. The two deep safeties also offer Cam some good opportunities to scramble for big yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, cover-2 is designed to take away the deep throws... but it is weak up the middle and on short/intermediate throws to the sidelines so we need to take full advantage of those two pass catching TE's we have on Sunday. It lines up perfectly with Olsen's desire to show Chicago that they made a mistake when they traded him away.

If we can hurt them with our TE's and/or run the ball effectively, it will force them to drop one of those safeties down and then we can hit them over the top. The two deep safeties also offer Cam some good opportunities to scramble for big yards.

but can a rookie QB stay disciplined enough to stick w/ the intermediate throws......and remain accurate. Cover 2 thinks you will get greedy...wanting to do ultimately do what you want (go for chunks).

It will be intersting to see the Carolina gameplan. The Jag weather really limited our view of what Chud would have Cam do in this type of matchup (AZ and GB had similar principles).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam overthrew a lot of guys on short to intermediate routes against JAX early on. If he does that against CHI, we're toast. if he is clicking and hitting those routes in stride, we should have a lot of success in this game.

I agree.....

my only internal question was it just an "off" day....or was the conservative coverage impacting Cam and making him more nervous on those throws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they sill have one of the two worst olines in the league right now. as much as this might be a juicy matchup for a mike martz offense, that oline with a QB that is having to make quick passes is still going to keep them down. we keep that pressure on cutler and he won't have time to make those big throws.

that isn't what i'm worried about. the martz offense is irrelevant because they can't run it the way it's intended. the only thing i'm worried about offensively is matt forte.

as far as their cover2 defense...last week was essentially a scrimmage to help cam and the boys get it figured out. the thing that has always been kryptonite for the tampa2 are TEs. they are always weak in the seams. we have two very solid TEs, one of them has a very solid knowledge of their defense, having watched them for 4 years and practicing against them weekly, and we have a QB that is incredibly comfortable throwing to them.

i like our chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam overthrew a lot of guys on short to intermediate routes against JAX early on. If he does that against CHI, we're toast. if he is clicking and hitting those routes in stride, we should have a lot of success in this game.
I agree.....

my only internal question was it just an "off" day....or was the conservative coverage impacting Cam and making him more nervous on those throws.

i don't know about off day or anything like that. i look at that as being a learning experience for a young QB obsessed with learning and improving. i'm not worried.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...