Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Revis vs Gamble


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

i give revis credit for ONE thing, he claims smith to be HANDS DOWN the toughest receiver hes ever been asked to cover.

i live in new york and the jets have got to be the most overrated team these past few years. the jets have been 9-7 the past two years and somehow made it into the afc championship. people here in new york actually believe sanchez is a top quality quarterback (like philip rivers level of quality) and that revis is the best player in the nfl. its hilarious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive been telling people for years, big players on big market teams get away with murder and we always get the shaft for being a small market them. They just chalk it up to envy and crazy conspiracy talks but the more i watch every year, the more im convinced games are rigged. That PI on gamble yesterday was absolute BS. Im surprised the huddle isnt saying more about it. Who was the 2nd PI on...Godfrey, Martin or Gamble?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the PI on godfrey was questionable... the ball was pretty much thrown out of bounds. PI isnt supposed to be called on uncatchable balls. godfrey gettin at the guys hands got him that penalty.

i must say the one on gamble was really iffy. its alright tho, with cam those calls will start coming our way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's because the Refs are all up on Revis' D Sack. If you go and watch some of his INTs, he either has safety help over the top or holding and pulling the WR that he doesn't get called for and they call him the best corner in the league....

This. Revis simply gets away with more than other CB. Instead of calling PI or holding they just say he was being physical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly He's played two seasons and started 28 games. He's well beyond the point of being able to point to 2 or 3 games and being able to say, "THAT is the QB he is and will be in the future" Of course he can get there, but anyone trying to use just those couple of games to rank his place amongst the games QB's today and their full career's worth of playing at that level, is just asinine. Mahomes, Allen, Lamar, Burrow, Hurts, Herbert, Daniels, Stafford, Goff, Geno, Purdy, Baker, Love, Dak, Tua, Kyler, Lawrence That's 17 QB's right there that have played better over their careers than Bryce has played at his best.  And I'm not saying they're all studs or guys I'd want to be our QB moving forward, Tua for example I wouldn't touch with a 10 foot pole, but his body of work is a million times better than Bryce's has been. It's also not including any of the other QB's drafted in 2023/2024 other than Daniels. So again, say you believe in Bryce, say you think he's going to prove he can and should be our QB of the future, that's all fair and totally fine. But nobody can say he's been an above average QB in his career thus far, it's just an asinine notion.
    • I'd think we could get one of those from Dallas for... whatever. 
×
×
  • Create New...